LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 306
0 members and 306 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-26-2020, 05:53 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
A majority of Alabama voters in 1960 thought black people should ride in the back of buses and give up their seats if someone who looks like you needed it. You don't think we need to have checks on the majority?
The parties used to check each other. Now they just follow MMT and argue about how to redistribute at the margins. And about who gets to marry or fuck who, or have an abortion.

ETA: Actually, that’s a bit unfair. Clinton and Obama were both fiscally prudent. But it was easy for Clinton, as he had the tech boom, and that imploded at the end of his term. Obama was close to “Democratic Austerity.” Biden will preside over a spending orgy, however, as he has no option. I think Trump would do the same, but not quite as much as he’d be less supportive of plans to lockdown to combat spikes, which would negatively impact growth, causing need for even more stimulus.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 10-26-2020 at 06:04 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.