LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 568
0 members and 568 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-05-2004, 06:36 PM   #11
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Discouraged Workers (No, not me, I mean Paul Krugman . . .)

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I suspect I'm being redundant here, but I'm not sure that you, Luskin, Krugman, DeLong, S_A_M, skeksy and 17, and I (inter alia) are all using the term "discouraged workers" the same way.
True. It's Monday, and I am surely one such discouraged worker.

However, (and I'm not talking about this board right now), I'm reading more and more tripe that attempts to bring out the definition of discouraged worker further and further, encompassing all those who wish they made more money, as well as all those who made unsupportable sums in the dot-com irrationality and aren't doing so now, and I get the feeling that if they can just define it so widely as to make quantification impossible, they can keep citing it without having to defend it.
bilmore is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.