LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 704
0 members and 704 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-23-2004, 06:39 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
I see you missed Ty's explanation. It is because the fetus needs a PARTICULAR person to survive. Which of course means that when medical technology advances to the point where a fetus can be transplanted from one womb to another, abortion will be illegal since the fetus will then be like a baby and not need a PARTICULAR person to survive.
Sure, and I would wager that when medical technology advances to that point, we will see pre-term adoptions, and a massive effort to undertake them.

I would have no problem whatsoever banning abortion in all cases, except possibly rape and diagnosed genetic disease, if the mother-to-be has the realistic alternative of saying to some woman desiring to be a mother, "here, you take it." And, given the demand for white babies through adoption, that will solve the problem for all those 25 year old middle class white women.

So, call me back when medical technology gets to that point.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.