Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
I'd consider myself a hair guy, if you will, as opposed the the more common breast and ass men.
Good hair:
Length is not really a priority, although some people like like hair exclusively. If the question is longer versus healthier, then definately healthier wins. I've definitely found very short hair attractive on some women.
Quantity is not critical so long as it meets certain minimums. Thick is good, but lots of volume isn't a positive of a negative, depending on hair type. I generally go for smooth hair, but I had a girlfriend once with huge curly hair who was very sexy.
Shiny in the sense of healthy is good. Oily not so good.
Soft is good. Very good.
Strong such that it can be held onto / clenched at appropriate times is good.
Straight vs. wavy vs. curly is a matter of personal taste. I don't really care so long as the cut and style is appropriate and the person is working with it instead of against it.
Some people are biased toward a color. I have a slight preference for redheads, but not enough to override an otherwise promising head of hair. Bad dye jobs are bad.
A good cut is critical. Split ends are bad.
Hair should also smell nice. Chemically hair is bad.
Really, it's a total package issue for me, but some people emphasize one aspect over another (primarily color and length, it would seem).
|
Wow, who knew?
The one thing I took from the Simple Life the one time I watched it is that going blonde is so pedestrian, so done by everyone, so totally unoriginal. I cant tell Paris Hilton from Sarah Michelle Gellar from the neck up, and Nicole Ritchie's blondness makes her look even more like a piece of trashy. I am now, perhaps temporarily, that the most original thing one can do with their hair is absolutely nothing. Shouldnt your natural haircolor be the most flattering in terms of matching your complexion and being healthy anyway?
Threaded Mode