Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
This is probably a stupid question but why does the fact that some people are authorized to take the pics prevent the paparazzit from getting different and potentially more embarrassing photos- which is what we really want to see?
Edited to add that I think this stalkarazzi thing makes more sense on the baby level and not the wedding level which is a one time event. However, I am not sure why the stalkarazzi wouldnt still go for it just bc the Star has some pics of the little gekko wrapped up in towels. ANd why does CZJ have to do these stypid commercials? I am guessing she gets nachos in the prenup and divorce is not an impossibility
|
On 1), nothing prevents it, but the
EXCLUSIVE FIRST PICS label has a lot of value in that world, which is gone once the pics are there. Also, better quality actually has value. From everything I've read about this industry, which is not much, readers/buyers actually do prefer high-quality pics to ones that look like they've been taken from behind a bush late at night, while running away from the cops, since that's how they were taken. So the paparazi are left to pick up crumbs like CZJ smoking with child in tow. Still valuable, but not as.
2) Didn't CZJ sign some deal where she comes into more money each year? Like, $1M for each year she stays with him, and after 7 years she gets full inheritance rights, or at least pretty good rights? But, yeah, if you're a 28 year old marrying a 56 year old, you have to figure that as soon as your tits sag because a baby has been clamped on to them, the chances that another 25 year old with perky nips might draw his attention go way up.
Threaded Mode