LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 382
0 members and 382 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-22-2004, 01:12 PM   #11
leagleaze
I didn't do it.
 
leagleaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
pc stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
I am concerned about the impact of Hitler on Jews. Could we speak of his history so that I can understand what was driving him?

v.

How can you defend the murderous and racist Hitler?

Am I bigoted because I would use the second phrase? Intolerant of Hitler? It still comes down to personal context in your example. Obviously, no one would call me bigoted for ripping into Adolph. No one seems to call the person ripping into the uncommon Mormon practice of the one old fart taking seven teenage wives "intolerant". That's because the bulk of the people are viewing it as indefensible. I view the role of women in several religions similarly, but expressions of that are "intolerant"? No way. You seem to be succumbing to the myth that it's not PC if it upholds the pop morality. I can't accept the view that "they beat their wives, but it's okay, because their culture is different" is a morally supportable thesis, but that's what your "tolerance" seems to demand.

As usual, you are looking at the shallow end of the analysis.

It is all about context and that is the point.
leagleaze is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.