LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 666
0 members and 666 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-28-2004, 01:38 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
The next Kerry scandal.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I'll take it as a joke when you actually say something that indicates respect for the military service of a decorated veteran.


I find it deeply offensive when Americans refuse to do this. It is something I used to see on the left quite frequently -- I remember nearly getting into a fistfight at a march in DC many years ago, after the Grenada invasion, because people were screaming at a US soldier for having come to the march to see what people were saying. Disgusting.

Equally disgusting, but I think far more hypocritical, is when Repubs who repeatedly profess their love and admiration for the military behave in the same way, because the individual who served his country in wartime, by actually going to war, happens to be a political opponent.
Am I on ignore? I've been saying that I repsect the guy's decision all day. But when he plays up the differences between his Vietnam era record and Bush's, isn't it fair for someone to inquire about the merits of those differences?

I mean, if Bush was saying "I was a fighter pilot, man that means I one bad-ass", and start showing Independence Day at rallys, wouldn't it be fair to say, "You can't prove you were even there."

When Kerry's people imply Bush was a coward in comparision and used family to get out of Vietnam, its fair for the other side to say "how'd you get out of country so quick, John." When he pumps up his 3 purple hearts, its a fair question to ask "what were the injuries?"

In the end none of it matters, and its just early mud. Anyone from that time knows tons of people did what Kerry did, what W did and what billy did. Those people recognize the acts of 20 year old men in 68-72 aren't really instructive as to the present day man.

It kind of like the Bullshit of someone who wants to be on the Supreme Court has to apparently claim to never smoked pot. I mean honestly, someone under 50 who hasn't smoked pot is too weird for the Court or the White House.
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.