LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 86
0 members and 86 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-28-2004, 05:09 PM   #11
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Dead Babies

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And you don't think the question of whether the fetus is human affects the analysis of how important its rights are?*



*[to Not Me]Don't tell me what the USSC has said. I'm not asking what the USSC thinks, I'm asking what you think.**[/to Not Me]
To even have this discussion we have to address what is the definition of human. What do you mean when you say someone is a human? If you tell me how you are defining that term, that is the starting point for us discussing whether a fetus is human under that definition.

As we have discussed before, if you define it by DNA, then the cells you scrape out of my mouth are humans because they contain a full set of human chromosomes. If you define it by capacity to think, then those born with severe neurological deficits and incapble of achieving consciousness aren't humans under that defintion. If you define it simply by the fact that someone has been born or has not been born, well, that is so obviously flawed that it isn't worth addressing.

So what do you mean when you say "human"?
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.