Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You're busting his ass because he was near Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968, and later in Cambodia, and made the mistake of saying that he was in Cambodia that day. OK.
You guys had better keep beating the drum on this one. I think you're convincing a lot of swing voters -- keep it up.
|
numbskull. do you understand the meaning of the word credibility? it applies both to you and your little JFK. As to you, 3 posts ago you said the campaign was silent, but that bilmore had interpreted silence as an admission. I show you the admission, now you're saying it doesn't matter (which I have been saying anyway). The statements the campaign makes aren't that he was anywhere in particular at any particular time, but "he is sure" he was in Cambodia at some point. That sounds like a hedge in case there is some other proof next week.
Like say if I said I was in SF at Christmas. then you show I wasn't because I was at my mom's. I might then say "Well I have been in SF, " which is a positive statement. On the other hand if I say "I'm sure I was in SF" it leaves open the possibility that maybe i wasn't and am confused by being cruised by 3 men in some southern town. I know you know this and you're just exercising your chops on loser arguments, but still you should be concerned about credibility.
Threaded Mode