LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,757
0 members and 2,757 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-29-2004, 07:37 PM   #11
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Snagged from practice area listserv

Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
In ACLU Case, Federal Court Strikes Down Patriot Act Surveillance Power As Unconstitutional


September 29, 2004




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

"Censorship And Secrecy May Potentially Be Turned On Ourselves As A Weapon Of Self-Destruction," Court Says

NEW YORK - Saying that "democracy abhors undue secrecy," a federal court today struck down an entire Patriot Act provision that gives the government unchecked authority to issue "National Security Letters" to obtain sensitive customer records from Internet Service Providers and other businesses without judicial oversight. The court also found a broad gag provision in the law to be an "unconstitutional prior restraint" on free speech.

http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/Safe...ID=16603&c=282

The court's decision is at:

http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/Safe...ID=16596&c=262
Wow. I like looking at the redacted documents. I particularly like that the gov't demanded that a quote from a published SCOTUS case be redacted. Not the cite, just the quote.
ltl/fb is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.