| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 212 |  
| 0 members and 212 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 09:14 PM | #4126 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Skeks in the city She's probably an activist, given that Clinton appointed her and she worked full time for left-wing organizations before becoming a judge.  If she is an activist, it's possible some right-wing wacko other than the white power dude killed her.  Activist judges have many wacko enemies who believe their activities are an affront to God, racism, &c, &c.
 |   After all, she was an Episcopalian Jew, or married to an Episcopalian Jew.  
 
If she were an activist, wouldn't you think she'd have ruled against the white supremacists in the first place?
				__________________I'm using lipstick again.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 09:28 PM | #4127 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 
					Posts: 721
				      | 
				
				Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by ltl/fb After all, she was an Episcopalian Jew, or married to an Episcopalian Jew.
 
 If she were an activist, wouldn't you think she'd have ruled against the white supremacists in the first place?
 |  It's hard to say.  Activist liberal judges sometimes are sticklers on business issues, and only indulge their activist tendencies on what they purport to be civil rights issues.  Anyway, the activist judges should take this as a reminder that being appointed for life doesn't mean for very long, if you get yourself killed.
				 Last edited by Skeks in the city; 03-02-2005 at 09:30 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 09:36 PM | #4128 |  
	| Flaired. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Out with Lumbergh. 
					Posts: 9,954
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by ltl/fb If anything, that sounds like it was written by club/spanky's people.  "When drawing up congressional districts, states should be allowed to ignore geography and make obscure districts of mostly minorities (ie, racial gerrymandering)"
 
 eta my top person was Breyer, I think, then Stevens. Maybe vice-versa.
 |  Breyer 
Ginsburg 
O'Connor 
Souter 
Kennedy 
Stevens 
Rehnquist 
Scalia 
Thomas
 
I guessed Ginsburg would be number 1.  I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order). |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 09:48 PM | #4129 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by notcasesensitive I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order).
 |  that's right! You were the one bothered by an educated vocabulary.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 10:15 PM | #4130 |  
	| Classified 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: You Never Know . . . 
					Posts: 4,266
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop Sorry.  I fixed it above, or you can find it here.
 |  O'Connor 
Kennedy 
Rehnquist 
Breyer 
Ginsberg 
Souter 
Scalia 
Thomas
 
The first and last two don't surprise me.  I was a little surprised that the Chief was 3rd.
 
S_A_M
				__________________"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."
 
 Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 10:24 PM | #4131 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Hank Chinaski that's right! You were the one bothered by an educated vocabulary.
 |   So you think it all turned on her answer to the "capitol" punishment question?  Hmmm.
				__________________I'm using lipstick again.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 10:30 PM | #4132 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by ltl/fb So you think it all turned on her answer to the "capitol" punishment question?  Hmmm.
 |  She has been bothered since he used plebiscite
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-02-2005, 10:44 PM | #4133 |  
	| Moderasaurus Rex 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 33,080
				      | 
				
				Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Skeks in the city She's probably an activist, given that Clinton appointed her and she worked full time for left-wing organizations before becoming a judge.  If she is an activist, it's possible some right-wing wacko other than the white power dude killed her.  Activist judges have many wacko enemies who believe their activities are an affront to God, racism, &c, &c.
 |  The real activists now are the conservatives.  Get with it.  It's not like lefties are trying to bring back Lochner  or anything.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 12:55 AM | #4134 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by notcasesensitive Breyer
 Ginsburg
 O'Connor
 Souter
 Kennedy
 Stevens
 Rehnquist
 Scalia
 Thomas
 
 I guessed Ginsburg would be number 1.  I could have guessed that Scalia and Thomas would be the last two (tho not necessarily in that order).
 |  Ginsburg 
Stevens 
Breyer 
Souter 
O'Connor 
Kennedy 
Rhenquist 
Scalia  
Thomas
 
Shocking, all around. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 01:14 AM | #4135 |  
	| Consigliere 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pelosi Land! 
					Posts: 9,480
				      | 
				
				Activist Judge's Relatives Murdered
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Tyrone Slothrop The real activists now are the conservatives.  Get with it.  It's not like lefties are trying to bring back Lochner or anything.
 |  Our takeover isn't complete until International Shoe  gets tossed aside. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 02:31 AM | #4136 |  
	| For what it's worth 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: With Thumper 
					Posts: 6,793
				      | 
				
				Go Figure
			 
 GinsburgBreyer
 Souter
 O'Conner
 Scalia
 Kennedy
 Rehnquist
 Stevens
 Thomas
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 03:00 AM | #4137 |  
	| Consigliere 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pelosi Land! 
					Posts: 9,480
				      | 
				
				Go Figure
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Spanky Ginsburg
 Breyer
 Souter
 O'Conner
 Scalia
 Kennedy
 Rehnquist
 Stevens
 Thomas
 |  You've gotta be kidding me.   I'm revoking my proxy, Eugene McCarthy. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 09:25 AM | #4138 |  
	| usually superfluous 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: the comfy chair 
					Posts: 434
				      | 
				
				Go Figure
			 
 Ginsburg Scalia
 Breyer
 Kennedy
 Souter
 Thomas
 O'Connor
 Stevens
 Rehnquist
 
 #2 seems a bit out of place.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 11:15 AM | #4139 |  
	| In my dreams ... 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 
					Posts: 1,955
				      | 
				
				another quiz, jurisprude-style
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man O'Connor
 Kennedy
 Rehnquist
 Breyer
 Ginsberg
 Souter
 Scalia
 Thomas
 
 The first and last two don't surprise me.  I was a little surprised that the Chief was 3rd.
 
 S_A_M
 |  Woah -
 
O'Connor 
Kennedy 
Rehnquist 
Scalia 
Thomas 
Ginsberg 
Breyer 
Souter 
Stevens
 
BR(How did some of you manage to get Scalia and Thomas in any order other than one after the other?)C
eta: SAM, you're missing one
				__________________- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  03-03-2005, 11:26 AM | #4140 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Go Figure
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by SlaveNoMore You've gotta be kidding me.   I'm revoking my proxy, Eugene McCarthy.
 |  #1: Breyer  
#2: Souter  
#3: Ginsburg 
#4: O'Connor  
#5: Scalia  
#6: Stevens  
#7: Thomas  
#8: Kennedy 
#9: Rehnquist 
 
How come no polygamy questions?
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |