LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 103
0 members and 103 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-29-2005, 08:13 PM   #11
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
More tyranny I like

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
FWIW, this is what I've seen:

Guys who flip land do well with least annoyance, but its tricky, because you need to cover carrying costs with no cash flow from the property.

Guys who put up cheap boxes (Wal Marts, drug store chains - nice, fat long term leases) do well. A Rite Aid can be a fucking sweet cash machine.

Mini mall guys have problems (shit tenants, lousy leases).

Residential development is a pain unless you're just flipping lots. Don't get into building homes. That shit can become a nightmare.

YMMV
I have a line on the first, cheap property that for a variety of specific reasons will appreciate well beyond the market for the next 5 years no matter what I do.

I have a sort of line on a combo of 2-3. Awesome commercial property. Next door to recently rehabbed commercial district that is now trendy. This is the next block that will go but it is still priced with a premium to be realized.

I have considered residential on the first cheap property, but I could always hold and just make 20% a year on my money.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.