LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 159
0 members and 159 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-01-2005, 04:24 PM   #11
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Gonzales

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Novak doesn't want Gonzales. Maybe that is a good thing:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20050627.shtml
Interesting. I really think Bush is cognizant of his dad's fuck ups and doesn't want the shitty milquetoast legacy of his dad and as such will be cognizant of the Souter trap.

I wish the age thing was a block for them, as I think Olsen would be good. I would also be happy to see a U/Chicagoer. Epstein or Posner (hi uknowho!). Although I know that won't happen.

I was sort of pro-Gonzales, but this sort of gives me pause:

"he could not bring himself to support parental notification on the Texas Supreme Court. While he professes to be anti-abortion, he maintains Roe v. Wade is inviolable -- a judicial version of John Kerry's formulation."

The first sentence is where the pro-choice crowd totally loses me. the second sentence I find problematic because the bottom line is its a poorly crafted opinion and shouldn't be inviolable on that plank(ton) alone.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.