LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,432
1 members and 1,431 guests
Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2005, 10:39 AM   #1
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,071
Street Fighting Man

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Are you using the Bong tonight. Again, I was pointing out that in the small states the people have inclination towards limited government. Just because some of their politicians representing their states are voting for increased spending during a war at the Federal level does not mean that the citizens of these states have abandoned their anitpathy towards government. Have the state governments in these states started increasing their spending recently? Have they changed their state legislatures from being part time to full time? Just because some of their representatives have voted for increased government spending over the past few years does not mean that the average citizen of these states have changed their inclinations towards small government.
Whatever. I have lived in the biggest state and the smallest state, and some in between, and know rather more about their respective governments than you seem to think. I was making a rather different point, about the hypocrisy of the modern Republican party, who prattle about the virtue of small government while spending more and more federal money, esp. on pork.

Quote:
No but the statement kiss my ass is just as petty and juvenile as telling me to move to Somalia, and both demonstrate that you are losing the argument and are therefore resorting to juvenile statements.
Somalia is the ultimate in small government, so I thought it had a sort of reductio ad absurdum charm to it, but different strokes, I guess.

Quote:
We are getting nothing close to Gray Davis budgets. He increased spending by forty percent while he was in office. And it would be nice if the government was spending the money on roads, prisons and schools. Instead it is spending money on bureacracys and no bid contracts.
As I think your answer implicitly suggests, we essentially have had Gray Davis budgets under Arnold, without the cuts in spending that would restore the state's budget to balance. Instead, we get the same sort of tricks -- e.g., deals with Indian casinos, which revenue gets counted all in the first year instead of as it comes in -- to paper over the imbalance.

Quote:
I am listeneing to what you are saying, but trying to argue that voting population in the rural states are less inclined towards big government is a completely ridiculous position to take. It is completely unsupportable and yet you try and argue it.
Please show me where I said that.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.