LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 132
0 members and 132 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-02-2005, 07:46 PM   #11
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
More predictions

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If you insist on conflating segregation with a women's rights issue, you'll wind up on more ignore lists than even you can tolerate.

They are not analogous for an innumerable number of reasons you very well know.

Roe is unique. Abortion is unique. Nothing is analagous. Thus, the "superprecedent."
this is bullshit. Plessy was wrong. slavery was wrong, but the decision, in context was no less a precedent. For 50 plus years. And Roe could be argued to be just as wrong. If for some cosmic UMC reason the rights of the feti trump the rights of the mother, a lot of innocent feti have had their rights trampled.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.