LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 100
0 members and 100 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-09-2006, 09:38 PM   #11
SlaveNoMore
Consigliere
 
SlaveNoMore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,480
Say it ain't so, Joe

Quote:
ltl/fb
No. Possibly if there were an actual world war going on, but as an opening attack? Hah.

eta probably you were not asking that with any seriousness and I am just tired and didn't pick up on it. because no one could ask that with any seriousness.
And I ask it with entire seriousness. Do we hand-wring, fret and worry about "collateral damage" (see Vietnam, now) or do we go after the enemy with fury and desire to win (see union army, WWII)?

By saying "if there were an actual war going on" - you actually mean "should we retaliate if attacked"?

And having watched an "opening attack" first hand, I honestly have no moral problem whatsoever with pre-emptively leveling an entire city and killing everything that moves if they're trying to get us first.
SlaveNoMore is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 PM.