| 
				
				Re: It was the wrong thread
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  I'm sure district judges everywhere appreciate that they will now (if they weren't) get another mailed-in post-trial/pre-verdict motion that they have to consider and reject solely for the purposes of the Federal Circuit's willingness to review the damages verdict more carefully if such a motion is filed before, rather than after, damages are awarded by the jury. |  The fact that the argument wasn't raised in the trial court suggests that it wasn't a likely winner on the merits in the appellate court, no?  Maybe this is just a procedural way to put a dog out of its misery.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |