It was the wrong thread

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by LessinSF

Wrong. You are governed by the MI rules of professional conduct.

I thought u meant court rules. I was grandfathered out of the ethics rules.

addendumb:

in patents the D will often waive the ACP and hand over opinions as part of its defense, so it isn't such a weird thing to see stuff you might not have expected to see.

the one time I saw something I "knew" I shouldn't I sent an email to OC and he told me it was something they had sent my client as part of a settlement attempt.

more egg on my face than anytime since that Tuesday night I convinced Atticus's sister it was okay for us to date during her period.

[LessinSF]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

I thought u meant court rules. I was grandfathered out of the ethics rules.

addendumb:

in patents the D will often waive the ACP and hand over opinions as part of its defense, so it isn't such a weird thing to see stuff you might not have expected to see.

the one time I saw something I "knew" I shouldn't I sent an email to OC and he told me it was something they had sent my client as part of a settlement attempt.

more egg on my face than anytime since that Tuesday night I convinced Atticus's sister it was okay for us to date during her period.

And the wait for whether MI has addressed this issue continues.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by LessinSF

And the wait for whether MI has addressed this issue continues.

questioning someone's legal ethics is libel per se IIRC.

[Penske 2.0]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

questioning someone's legal ethics is libel per se IIRC.

I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0

I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....

Some of them show behavior that is unethical per se (eg deleting political commentary) and truth is a defense so I'm comfortable with my actions- I sleep soundly thank you very much.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0

I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....

i don't normally respond to the same post twice- but you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

i don't normally respond to the same post twice- but you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

AON, I'll consider it a milestone when a state appellate court overturns a defamation verdict on the ground that alleging that someone is gay is simply not defamatory because it does not tend to harm the reputation of the plaintiff.

[Fugee]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

AON, I'll consider it a milestone when a state appellate court overturns a defamation verdict on the ground that alleging that someone is gay is simply not defamatory because it does not tend to harm the reputation of the plaintiff.

You mean 'cause yer gay?

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally Posted by Adder

You mean 'cause yer gay?

Oooh, burn.

[Penske 2.0]

Originally Posted by Fugee

It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense.

Thanks.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Fugee

It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense.

Q: how many Penske's does it take to have sex with a married lady?
A: no one knows. so far no identified penske has been willing to fulfill the condition precedent of telling his doctor he need a Viagra Rx

[Penske 2.0]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Q: how many Penske's does it take to have sex with a married lady?
A: no one knows. so far no identified penske has been willing to fulfill the condition precedent of telling his doctor he need a Viagra Rx

When I could regularly knock off sub-5 miles I had no need for performance enhancing drugs, same assessment with Viagra. As much as I enjoy excess, there probably can be too much of a good thing.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0

When I could regularly knock off sub-5 miles I had no need for performance enhancing drugs, same assessment with Viagra. As much as I enjoy excess, there probably can be too much of a good thing.

my wife said to tell you she thinks you're sub 2 minutes

can someone decode this?

[Penske 2.0]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

my wife said to tell you she thinks you're sub 2 minutes

?

A gentleman doesn't kiss and tell; however, at least your last post clears up the spurious libel issue. Thanks.