Objectively intelligent.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

This is some clever reframing. Now the argument shifts to, “Something more worthy should have been offered instead of Cotton’s clickbait.”

Cotton is a Senator. If he wants to troll, the public should consider his trolling — see it, consider it, and consider the fact that a Senator thinks as he does, and then decide whether to accept or reject it.

The author of the criticism I think pretends to lament the Grey Lady’s debasement, but is actually concerned that Cotton’s view, while rejected by most people, will gain exposure and be accepted by some. Again, he’s trying to preclude free speech — to be the decider of what falls into the sphere of deviancy.

dude, keep in mind Ty is the mother of also censors. He deletes shit he doesn't like. Ty here is what Trump wishes he were in the world. Sad.