LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 128
0 members and 128 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-06-2020, 08:36 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: For Icky

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
Some yes, some no. In this case, it was simply convincing them not to pick a side, and get the company sued. It was the path of least risk, which the VP who made the decision was familiar with.
This is why I refuse to escrow money for anyone. All you need is one dispute over who’s entitled to what and you wind up pissing away time dicking around with motions to pay it into the court. All while your fees are held up.

If I wasn’t required to keep an escrow account I wouldn’t even have one. I only hold it for compliance. Never used.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.