» Site Navigation |
|
|
|
» Online Users: 599 |
| 0 members and 599 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
 |
|
12-18-2008, 06:51 PM
|
#1966
|
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
|
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 07:06 PM
|
#1967
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,161
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
|
Sadly no. Justice would not have taken up so much of the Chungs time and resources defending themselves, or required a 23 opinion from an appellate court. |
|
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 07:14 PM
|
#1968
|
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
Sadly no. Justice would not have taken up so much of the Chungs time and resources defending themselves, or required a 23 opinion from an appellate court.
|
2. And justice would not let Pearson go commensaturely unpunished for his douchebaggery.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 08:28 PM
|
#1969
|
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
2. And justice would not let Pearson go commensaturely unpunished for his douchebaggery.
|
He did lose his $105,000 a year job. And the Chungs incurred no costs, having raised the costs of the first trial through fundraising, and being represented pro bono on the appeal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 08:43 PM
|
#1970
|
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,161
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
He did lose his $105,000 a year job.
|
He had every opportunity to avoid that, including according you your wiki taking a $12,000 settlement offer, which is way more than his case ever was worth.
It cost them their time and money, and as I recall they also closed that store. |
|
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:09 PM
|
#1971
|
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
He did lose his $105,000 a year job. And the Chungs incurred no costs, having raised the costs of the first trial through fundraising, and being represented pro bono on the appeal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung |
Not good enough. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, yes? Pain and suffering of the Chungs?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 10:40 AM
|
#1972
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
Not good enough. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, yes? Pain and suffering of the Chungs?
|
Penske and I are on board here.
Can we sue him for the damage done to the profession?
And a loss of consortium claim based on the cancelation of Boston Legal. After all, their outrageous antics paled besides these kind of real life shenanigans. I think his actions led directly to the cancellation of that show. |
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 11:31 AM
|
#1973
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
Not good enough. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, yes? Pain and suffering of the Chungs?
|
man lost his favorite pair of pants. some mother fucker loses my favorite pants, I'm suing their ass for all i can too.
you spend time on a chat room called Fashion board, how you going to pretend you can't understand a man's pain from losing his pants? sure, we can all pretend like we're above suing over some numbskull losing some pants, but shit, that the man's pants, and you know you don't fuck with a man's favorite pants, and i know it, and the fucking Chungs should fucking well have known it.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 12-19-2008 at 11:36 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 11:32 AM
|
#1974
|
|
[witticism TBA]
Join Date: May 2007
Location: n00bville
Posts: 919
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
man lost his favorite pair of pants. some mother fucker loses my favorite pants, I'm suing their ass for all i can too.
you spend time on a chat room called Fashion board, how you going to pretend you can't understand a man's pain from losing his pants?
|
Didn't the dry cleaners have an insurance policy? Maybe not $54MM worth, but defense cost coverage?
__________________
Two men say they're Jesus; one of them must be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 01:37 PM
|
#1975
|
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Phoenix
Didn't the dry cleaners have an insurance policy? Maybe not $54MM worth, but defense cost coverage?
|
Yeah, but an SIR of $25k or more could easily put a family business underwater. |
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#1976
|
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
man lost his favorite pair of pants. some mother fucker loses my favorite pants, I'm suing their ass for all i can too.
you spend time on a chat room called Fashion board, how you going to pretend you can't understand a man's pain from losing his pants? sure, we can all pretend like we're above suing over some numbskull losing some pants, but shit, that the man's pants, and you know you don't fuck with a man's favorite pants, and i know it, and the fucking Chungs should fucking well have known it.
|
Were they fully italian silk lined?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 01:58 PM
|
#1977
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penske_Account
Were they fully italian silk lined?
|
They offered to replace the $1200 suit from which they came.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
|
|
12-19-2008, 04:17 PM
|
#1978
|
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
They offered to replace the $1200 suit from which they came.
|
Ah, poly cotton blend, probably unlined. In the end what difference did it make, I thought judges went commando under those robes......why did he even own pants?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
|
|
01-22-2009, 04:21 PM
|
#1979
|
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,278
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Does anyone here use IM for work purposes? I'm troubled with the outright ban of it. I lost a similar battle a few years ago, so I might be still bitter about it.
In my opinion, might as well ban e-mail too.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
|
|
01-22-2009, 04:25 PM
|
#1980
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan
Does anyone here use IM for work purposes? I'm troubled with the outright ban of it. I lost a similar battle a few years ago, so I might be still bitter about it.
In my opinion, might as well ban e-mail too. |
No IM where I work. Not sure IM and email are the same in this regard--I imagine a big part of it is retention of records, and IM doesn't retain things in an acceptable way (like using rnc.org email addresses). Also, aren't the IM servers hosted by AOL, MSN, etc., rather than some secure whitehouse facility?
I suspect they'll just use text messaging or iphone IM anyway. I would.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
