Waiting for Fitzgerald - Page 144

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And today's "from out of left field" award goes to.....

2. Interesting, but unexpected........

Hank Chinaski · 10-06-2005, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
WHAT?!! Clinton perfermed sexual acts with Monica Lewinsky during his presidency? Why didn't I hear about this?

maybe you're too young to remember before W's administration, but sodomy was still illegal. It was during W's watch that the supremes finally said it was okay.

Billy didn't just perform sex acts- He

1 knowingly oversaw an employee do illegal sodomy, repeatedly

2 concealed her crime (obstruction)

3 did all this for a fat chick

Didn't Monica live across state lines? RICO?

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
maybe you're too young to remember before W's administration, but sodomy was still illegal. It was during W's watch that the supremes finally said it was okay.

Billy didn't perform sex acts- He

1 knowingly oversaw an employee do illegal sodomy, repeatedly

2 concealed her crime (obstruction)

3 did all this for a fat chick

Didn't Monica live across state lines? RICO?

Is masturbating in the oval office sink defiling a public landmark?

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Actually, I'm talking about the enemy our soldiers killed at Bush's orders. And the civilians killed by the mortars, shells, bombs, crossfire, etc. that were killed by our troops and planes at Bush's orders. Or are you suggesting that it's only an absolute wrong to kill Americans?

Clinton also killed a lot of Serbians when he bombed Belgrade. The purpose of those raids was not to intentionally kill innocent civilians although we knew that some would get cilled. It was collateral damage. Similarly the Bush administration has never intentionally killed innocent civilians. But I think our military has bent over backwards to try and minimise collateral damage (sometimes to much in my opinion). Sometimes I think we should have levelled mosques that insurgents were hiding in.

Saddam Hussein on the other hand intentionally killed at least 300,000 Iraq civilians. Clinton and Bush never intentionally killed anyone innocent. I don't think we can assign any deaths to either of them.

Al Queda and friends are responsible.

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
How do you know that basis? Can you cite me something? I don't really think, no offence, that you have an inside insight in the RNC. Spanky might. Spanky is what he says true?

Sorry - don't know. But if homosexuality is such an abomination why did God create it in the first place?

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Clinton........never intentionally killed anyone innocent. I don't think we can assign any deaths to either of them.

Vince Foster?

eta: Also, Mary Mahoney?

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Sorry - don't know. But if homosexuality is such an abomination why did God create it in the first place?

You have to ask Wonk, I don't know. He claimed it's in the Republican platform, and I doubt that this claim is true, but it is more of his campaign of lies and distortions to turn our attention away from the morally corrupt excesses of the bad elements of the left wing towards the petulant whining of the liberals about W.

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Vince Foster?

eta: Also, Mary Mahoney?

Call me Naive but I think Foster committed suicide. I don't know anything about Mahoney. Both Bush and Clinton were trying to do the right thing in their foreign interventions. People died not because of them, people died because of our enemies. But for our enemies these people would not have died.

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Call me Naive but I think Foster committed suicide. I don't know anything about Mahoney. Both Bush and Clinton were trying to do the right thing in their foreign interventions. People died not because of them, people died because of our enemies. But for our enemies these people would not have died.

I think Foster a toss-up, although if there was foul play there is no question who the two leading suspects would be, but the Arkancide list is a little too much circumstantial coincidence for me. As for Mahoney, I hate to bring her up, I think Hank dated her in LS, which explains, in part, his bitterness over the Clintons.

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:34 PM

Spank, want to deep six the Irving and do a little non-fiction:

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
He claimed it's in the Republican platform, and I doubt that this claim is true,

Actually it is probably true. Right now the Republican platform sucks. I have been trying to get it changed for years now but it has been a little tough going.

Spanky · 10-06-2005, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Spank, want to deep six the Irving and do a little non-fiction:

Have you read it yet? Did it get good reviews?

10-06-2005, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Have you read it yet? Did it get good reviews?

Punk Spanky once, shame on you. Punk Spanky twice, shame on him.

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Actually it is probably true. Right now the Republican platform sucks. I have been trying to get it changed for years now but it has been a little tough going.

WEll, it's his point, he can cite it. Until I see it, I ain't buying it.

Penske_Account · 10-06-2005, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Have you read it yet? Did it get good reviews?

It's not out until next week. He's doing an advance pimping on Sunday on 60Minutes. With the excerpts I have posted today, it looks damn good. I can only imagine the skeletons that will be unearthed.