Fashion Board 1-08-04 through 02-03-04 - Page 167

ltl/fb · 01-21-2004, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
It's supposed to be FEMALE?

Ooooh! Look at the three* cute little kitties all in a row!!!!!

*Possibly four now.

Hank Chinaski · 01-21-2004, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Because I apparently have an excellent memory for horrifying gross stuff, I feel compelled to note that raouaouaouaoaoal's gf did not upset him by putting her tongue up his ass. She upset him by putting a finger up there.

Unless I missed a separate story involving a tongue, in which case I feel fortunate.

Trust me on this one. It's sort of science trivia, and we'd get in trouble if we submit the question to the Board Thursday. He had a tongue experience, and decided he didn't want a good night kiss. i'm merely suggesting we try and grow form that post, and deal with this new situation in an inventive way.

ltl/fb · 01-21-2004, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Trust me on this one. It's sort of science trivia, and we'd get in trouble if we submit the question to the Board Thursday. He had a tongue experience, and decided he didn't want a good night kiss. i'm merely suggesting we try and grow form that post, and deal with this new situation in an inventive way.

It's coming back to me now. It's sort of related to the "guys who won't kiss you after you go down on them, even if they begged for a blow job" thing. Except I don't think he asked for tongue on the ass.

On a side note, I think I'm going to start saying "yehyeh" quickly and with a questioning yet approving tone, like Oliver's friends on that show on the Food Channel.

On another side note, what is the deal with scrungy guys wearing short-sleeved shirts on top of long-sleeved shirts? Is this a fashion statement, or does it have some kind of utility? If I were to layer, I would be inclined to put the long-sleeved shirt over the short-sleeved shirt. Does anyone have any insight on this highly important issue??

robustpuppy · 01-21-2004, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Not to mention the Everwood plotline involving the 16-yr-old kid getting romantically involved with (but not having intercourse with) his baby sister's 21-yr-old babysitter, and everyone yapping about how it's illegal. First of all, there's no sex so it can't be statutory rape. Second of all, and more importantly, under Colorado law (CO being the state in which all of the action takes place) if the minor is 15 or older it's not statutory rape if the non-minor is fewer than 10 years older than the minor.

Irritated the crap out of me. It may be a sign that I'm too old to be watching this stuff, but oh well.

You have to forgive them. The characters involved are an earnest 16 year old horny boy who's in luvv, and a dim bulb babysitter who thinks she's bright. Maybe it was intentional - they are misinformed about the state of the law but nonetheless are willing to risk it for love, while we, the audience, worry about the consequences of their having incomplete information. You know, kind of like Romeo and Juliet.

Not Me · 01-21-2004, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
It's supposed to be FEMALE?

Now, now. I knew that my revealing my large breasts would spark jealousy from the other women posters, but even I didn't think it would happen that fast and be so blatant. tsk, tsk. Jealousy is sooooo unbecoming, dear.

ltl/fb · 01-21-2004, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
You have to forgive them. The characters involved are an earnest 16 year old horny boy who's in luvv, and a dim bulb babysitter who thinks she's bright. Maybe it was intentional - they are misinformed about the state of the law but nonetheless are willing to risk it for love, while we, the audience, worry about the consequences of their having incomplete information. You know, kind of like Romeo and Juliet.

The FATHER was the one yelling the most about it being illegal, and I think it does not fit well with his character that he would never look it up to make sure it was illegal. Or that they would not mention the non-illegality of it in a later show, after the father has backed off and sort of gone along with the relationship. They may have done that, and I missed that show.

Romeo and Juliet. Please.

ltl/fb · 01-21-2004, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Now, now. I knew that my revealing my large breasts would spark jealousy from the other women posters, but even I didn't think it would happen that fast and be so blatant. tsk, tsk. Jealousy is sooooo unbecoming, dear.

Man-pleaser.* And the little saying above my avatar is "meow" -- you would be delusional to think that I'm not both catty and jealous with that there.

And, with implants, you could be both male and have enormous boobs.

*Or is it "manpleaser" (all one word)? Or "man pleaser" (two words, no hyphen)? dtb, help!

robustpuppy · 01-21-2004, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
The FATHER was the one yelling the most about it being illegal, and I think it does not fit well with his character that he would never look it up to make sure it was illegal. Or that they would not mention the non-illegality of it in a later show, after the father has backed off and sort of gone along with the relationship. They may have done that, and I missed that show.

Romeo and Juliet. Please.

If you had a 16 year old kid with a crush, would you disabuse him of the notion that it would be illegal for his sister's 21 year old babysitter to fuck him?

ltl/fb · 01-21-2004, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
If you had a 16 year old kid with a crush, would you disabuse him of the notion that it would be illegal for his sister's babysitter to fuck him?

As we know, I will not be having any children (most likely). And I'm a big fan of that TV movie with the plot where a late-teens kid played by the guy who played David (sometimes bf of Tory Spelling's character) on 90210 gets romantically (and sexually) involved with a friend of his mom's. So much a fan that at least a couple friends have said that our friendship will be on hiatus for a while during the teen years of any sons they might have.

ETA subject and to request that you opine on the shirt thing.

robustpuppy · 01-21-2004, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
As we know, I will not be having any children (most likely). And I'm a big fan of that TV movie with the plot where a late-teens kid played by the guy who played David (sometimes bf of Tory Spelling's character) on 90210 gets romantically (and sexually) involved with a friend of his mom's. So much a fan that at least a couple friends have said that our friendship will be on hiatus for a while during the teen years of any sons they might have.

I knew you had a bias. Do cougars meow?

As for the shirt thing, I like that look on a (cute) guy. It also makes sense from a layering perspective - you get the same number of layers without the bottom seams of the short sleeves rubbing against your arms.

Not Me · 01-21-2004, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Man-pleaser.*

*Or is it "manpleaser" (all one word)? Or "man pleaser" (two words, no hyphen)? dtb, help!

I think it may be man-pleazer. Care to wrestle me in a fountain wearing a bathing suit?*

*Link to pic of my bathingsuit [SPREE - this is a pic of a woman in a bathingsuit]:

http://canyonbeachwear.com/uploads/ss/5_large.jpg

ltl/fb · 01-22-2004, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I knew you had a bias. Do cougars meow?

As for the shirt thing, I like that look on a (cute) guy. It also makes sense from a layering perspective - you get the same number of layers without the bottom seams of the short sleeves rubbing against your arms.

I am a cute fluffy defenseless kitten, not a cougar.

What kind of person (who does not have some type of serious skin or nerve condition) worries about the bottom sleeves of a short-sleeved shirt rubbing on arms? Unless the shirt is, like, a hair shirt or something. But if you are wearing a hair shirt the thing that makes it penance is the discomfort.

NW Native · 01-22-2004, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Can one kayak on the Sound in February?

(It's, like, for a bet.)

Yes.

NW Native · 01-22-2004, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere

Just remember to get fish and chips at Spuds first.

Spuds is a greasy dive. It's like Beth's Cafe. Everyone says its great, a Seattle landmark. Until you actually go there.

NW Native · 01-22-2004, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
I'm pretty sure that there were other negative posts in there besides LFM's, but I'd agree the whole thing was hardly a "lynching." It was inhospitable, though.

To clear up a few misconceptions:
1) I didn't refer to it as a lynching. I refered to it as hazing.
2) Yes, I did come to this board to meet people I might be interested in corresponding with but I wasn't looking for sincere camaraderie on-board. Just to figure out who might be worth PMing.
3) The thing about 'if you want me to leave be a man and say it straight' was a tactical decision not a 'you hwurt my fweelings' post. Yes I was pissed getting his with inside joke posts I didn't understand (trust me - I'm not someone's sock, really). But there's nothing like throwing it down to quickly sort out who's who. Watch Support Your Local Sheriff (one of my favorites).
4) Yes, I really did leave. I had a brief due today and had to put in too many hours to get it done. But, now the desk is clear for a couple days and I'm back in a good mood.

nuff said