» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 356 |
0 members and 356 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
03-15-2007, 08:26 PM
|
#2611
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
caption, please
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
|
Mr. President, your lunch has arrived.
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 08:28 PM
|
#2612
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
caption, please
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
|
So George, how do you get these antiwar assholes away from your house?
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 08:41 PM
|
#2613
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
caption, please
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
|
too bad i gave up drinking or I might throw you a fuck sugar tits.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 10:07 PM
|
#2614
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
CAFE
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Lots of those cars end up in rental fleets, and ultimately hit the market used. Not a money-maker for the Big Three.
S_A_M
|
One of our partners is the former director of international tax for Ford. They literally lose money on every Focus. They can't build it for what people are willing to pay for it.
It's really quite sad.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 11:08 PM
|
#2615
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
Is Pakistan fucked? 'Cause that would be bad.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 11:11 PM
|
#2616
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
This reminds of someone, but who?
- The other ugly English trait promoting The Economist’s success in America is the Oxford Union argumentative style. At its epitome, it involves a stance so cocksure of its rightness and superiority that it would be a shame to freight it with mere fact. American debate contests involve grinding, yearlong concentration on one doughy issue, like arms control. The forte of Oxford-style debate is to be able to sound certain and convincing about a topic pulled out of the air a few minutes before, such as “Resolved: That women are not the fairer sex.” (The BBC radio shows “My Word” and “My Music,” carried on National Public Radio, give a sample of the desired impromptu glibness.) Economist leaders and the covers that trumpet their message offer Americans a blast of this style. Michael Kinsley, who once worked at The Economist, wrote that the standard Economist leader gives you the feeling that the writer started out knowing that three steps must be taken immediately — and then tried to think what the steps should be.
link
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 11:13 PM
|
#2617
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
i think the NYT, something not Fox-biased, had a story about what happens after M. the conclusions was that Pakistan voters were not behind a fundamentalist party. they were largely behind not religious parties. Onthe other hand, I remember in 2002 Osama was the most popular boy's name, so I may be wrong.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 12:31 AM
|
#2618
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
|
Musharraf presents the classic problem. He is clearly preferable to he democratic alternative in the short run. But keeping him in power may necessitate authoritarian means. Which choice to make is real dilemma.
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 12:47 AM
|
#2619
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
Every so often I use the term "Bushies" to refer to Bush Administration loyalists, so I'm happy to see that that's what they say inside the White House.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 02:52 AM
|
#2620
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
This reminds of someone, but who?
- ...it involves a stance so cocksure of its rightness and superiority that it would be a shame to freight it with mere fact.
|
Reminds me of every liberal pundit on the planet.
and maybe Adder
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 11:36 AM
|
#2621
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,276
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This reminds of someone, but who?
- The other ugly English trait promoting The Economist’s success in America is the Oxford Union argumentative style. At its epitome, it involves a stance so cocksure of its rightness and superiority that it would be a shame to freight it with mere fact. American debate contests involve grinding, yearlong concentration on one doughy issue, like arms control. The forte of Oxford-style debate is to be able to sound certain and convincing about a topic pulled out of the air a few minutes before, such as “Resolved: That women are not the fairer sex.” (The BBC radio shows “My Word” and “My Music,” carried on National Public Radio, give a sample of the desired impromptu glibness.) Economist leaders and the covers that trumpet their message offer Americans a blast of this style. Michael Kinsley, who once worked at The Economist, wrote that the standard Economist leader gives you the feeling that the writer started out knowing that three steps must be taken immediately — and then tried to think what the steps should be.
link
|
I'm a lifetime member of the Oxford Union Society. They have a really good bar.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 12:24 PM
|
#2622
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
|
If you're opposed to abortion, would it be OK to abort a fetus if you knew it would grow up to be a doctor who performed abortions?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#2623
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you're opposed to abortion, would it be OK to abort a fetus if you knew it would grow up to be a doctor who performed abortions?
|
Whoa, man. Deep. Did you, too, receive that special medical prescription for your eyes from the doctor?
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#2624
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you're opposed to abortion, would it be OK to abort a fetus if you knew it would grow up to be a doctor who performed abortions?
|
No the better course is not to abort. Then indoctrinate the person. Then shoot it with a long-range rifle if it doesn't get it.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
03-16-2007, 01:19 PM
|
#2625
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you're opposed to abortion, would it be OK to abort a fetus if you knew it would grow up to be a doctor who performed abortions?
|
Depends. Yes if it was Jesus that tells you how the fetus will end up.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|