» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 640 |
0 members and 640 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
08-24-2005, 04:51 PM
|
#2701
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I was working today and yesterday so I haven't had time to post. However, I wanted to point out that I think it was Not Bob (Jim Rockford) that pointed our the errors in my posts by using a primary source.
I think someone else used a primary source to refute one of my statements. Sorry - I forgot who it was or what it was about.
However, it was nice to see someone quoting a primary souce instead of some fellow ideologues "expert" opinion as "persuasive" evidence (Hello Ty and others).
The primary sources forced a substantive argument which was a nice change.
Just wanted to point that out.
|
2.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 05:10 PM
|
#2702
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
So, what, the military is really about social spending, not about national defense?
Quote:
Principi said the commission recognizes that closing bases is necessary to save money and transform the military to meet new challenges.
"At the same time, we know that the decisions we reach will have a profound impact on the communities hosting our military installations, and more importantly, on the people who bring those communities to life," he said.
|
I tend to agree more with this guy
Quote:
"It's not about just trying to get rid of excess capacity. It's actually about trying to reorganize the forces for future challenges," said Loren Thompson, a military analyst with the Lexington Institute, a think tank in Arlington, Virginia.
|
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/24/bas....ap/index.html
I did not look up the Lexington Institute and have no idea which way it swings.
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 05:19 PM
|
#2703
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Aaaaauuuuuggghh!
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
That POS McCain. Must every single goddamned Republican in America lay prostate before an altar in order to run for office?
The Arizona Star:
- McCain didn't comment on the resolution but vowed to continue speaking his mind.
As the Gallup Poll noted, McCain has a generally consistent conservative voting record but forged a national reputation after a series of notable breaks with fellow Republicans.
On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools and Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother who has come to personify the anti-war movement.
McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes "all points of view" should be available to students studying the origins of mankind.
The theory of intelligent design says life is too complex to have developed through evolution, and that a higher power must have had a hand in guiding it.
I don't want to hear a single thing from Republicans in this country when this trend comes around to bite us in the ass. Not a single, freakin' thing.
Gattigap
|
People have been free to believe in UFOs, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and its done no harm. The only people who will be influenced by the teaching of this myth are the same white trash who'd believe it whether its teaching was sanctioned by the govt or not.
I prefer to have my pool cleaners and caddies dumber than stumps. I see no reason not to turn the entirety of the bible belt into a fantastic source of indentured servitude labor. We should encourage them to believe more absurdities. The stupider, the better. When they get further crushed by globalization, we'll get them to mow lawns for a fraction of whhat those damn landscaping companies charge.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 08-24-2005 at 05:22 PM..
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 05:48 PM
|
#2704
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I was working today and yesterday so I haven't had time to post. However, I wanted to point out that I think it was Not Bob (Jim Rockford) that pointed our the errors in my posts by using a primary source.
|
Aw, spanky -- I love you, too, man.
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 05:52 PM
|
#2705
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,276
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
Aw, spanky -- I love you, too, man.
|
Careful, this crowd gets hostile if you get too affectionate with any one individual poster.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:09 PM
|
#2706
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Careful, this crowd gets hostile if you get too affectionate with any one individual poster.
|
If Bob starts writing about Spanky stroking his fingers through Bob's hair while Bob's blowing him, people will not get hostile exactly...
I think it'll be more like the reaction to ipecac.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:10 PM
|
#2707
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In that cafe crowded with fools
Posts: 1,466
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If Bob starts writing about Spanky stroking his fingers through Bob's hair while Bob's blowing him, people will not get hostile exactly...
I think it'll be more like the reaction to ipecac.
|
Isn't that basically what Hank has been posting?
__________________
Why was I born with such contemporaries?
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:16 PM
|
#2708
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by nononono
Isn't that basically what Hank has been posting?
|
Hank's got the goods on the torrid Not Bob/Spanky affair?
Wait... Not Bob is the Serbian tranny? Fuuuuccck me. It was in front of my eyes all along... so obvious.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:21 PM
|
#2709
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know.
Fark.com is running a photoshop contest re: Democratic celebrity candidates for CA gov. 2006. Several inspired choices there, but this one, IMO, is clearly the front runner.
I imagine having PP stalk the candidate across the state might become a bit distracting, though.
Gattigap
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:22 PM
|
#2710
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
Pat Robertson's call for assasination of Hugo Chavez
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Hi Valentine!
I'll sell you your old blueTriangle sock for $1000.
|
Get him to toss in that sock, and he could be your Valentine.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#2711
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Hank's got the goods on the torrid Not Bob/Spanky affair?
Wait... Not Bob is the Serbian tranny? Fuuuuccck me. It was in front of my eyes all along... so obvious.
|
How can it not be obvious to you that Hank and Spanky are having an affair? Hank speaks for Spanky all the time, has him in his sig line, keeps trying to tie himself closer and closer to Spanky in an obvious effort to have some (relative) popularity rub off (sts) on him . . . .
Isn't Christopher Walken going to be the next CA governator?
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:29 PM
|
#2712
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Isn't Christopher Walken going to be the next CA governator?
|
There's some of that, too.
![](http://filehost.to/files/2005-08-21_01/041756_walken.jpg)
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 06:32 PM
|
#2713
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,203
|
Primary Source
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
How can it not be obvious to you that Hank and Spanky are having an affair? Hank speaks for Spanky all the time, has him in his sig line, keeps trying to tie himself closer and closer to Spanky in an obvious effort to have some (relative) popularity rub off (sts) on him . . . .
Isn't Christopher Walken going to be the next CA governator?
|
I'm in denial. But I am glad to hear Not Bob is Not Blowing Spanky.
Why don't they celebrate their love with a Sphanky sock?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 07:19 PM
|
#2714
|
the original
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: so. florida
Posts: 45
|
Confidencial a Hank
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Hi Valentine!
I'll sell you your old blueTriangle sock for $1000.
|
Hola, Hank, mi amigo,
Le venderé mi calcetín, "el juan original", para el precio de un meeeelyun dólares.
sinceramenta,
Juan, el marino original de los Estados Unidos.
ep: ha sido un rato largo desde que usted escribió. ¿está usted enojado?
|
|
|
08-24-2005, 07:24 PM
|
#2715
|
In my dreams ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
|
Eeeevil-ution
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
People have been free to believe in UFOs, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and its done no harm. The only people who will be influenced by the teaching of this myth are the same white trash who'd believe it whether its teaching was sanctioned by the govt or not.
I prefer to have my pool cleaners and caddies dumber than stumps.
|
I have to say the whole "life is too complex to have developed through evolution, and a higher power must have had a hand in guiding it" argument strikes me as very similar to Barbie saying "Math is hard!"
I have no particular problem with your second proposal, so long as the moronism is freely chosen - meaning the kids must be properly taught, so as to have the opportunity to reject on an informed basis, evolution before being sterilized and assigned to the positions of servitude that they profess to want back so badly from the illegal Mexican laborers who have greedily stolen them away.
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|