More pie

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
No, it means he's unjustifiably arrogant for no good reason. flatline on that shit. bleh.

One cannot be arrogant unless he has $___________ .

Please fill in the blank.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
You spend hours on end with these long assed posts and have the balls to tell me I spend too much time on here.

I've never said you spent too much time here. Again, this is the brick problem you have. I pointed out that you told bnb she spends too much time here to be a good mother. At the same time, you spend more time here than she and you think you are an excellent paralegal. You don't get it because you're stupid.

Originally posted by patentparanyc
None of this matters. You yourself are not smokin' drop dead hot. You are too downtown and sloppily dressed--you're a prole associate and not a senior partner, or IBanker or hedge fund dude or CEO. you have an interesting look but it ain't classically handsome and you're ARROGANT and rude. it's not a good combo.

Of course none of this matters. But here's the key for me (and probably everyone else): I don't give a shit what you think about me or how I look. Truly. I told you you could say whatever you wanted about how I look before I ever met you(without outing me, of course). I didn't even beg you to be fair and at that point, you could have been totally hot. If it makes you feel better to rate me or tell me I'm ugly and poor (or even if it doesn't), please do.

And "prole associate" really doesn't make any sense. But I'm okay with that label too!

TM

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Jack Manfred
You know, if the three pages of posts are about ppnyc and her lunacy, it really negates the effectiveness of the ignore button.

What if we all ignored ppnyc for a week? Would the board be better or worse? If it was better, problem solved. If it was worse, and we needed ppnyc to have something to discuss, then we could recall her from the land of Fu.

Am I missing something? Is arguing with ppnyc some sort of global proxy fight for the board? You're mad at your spouse, but you don't want to argue with 'em so you respond to some inane thing that ppnyc said. You bounce a few posts back and forth, finally venting and realizing that your spouse is nowhere near as delusional as ppnyc, so you can stand another night with your spouse? Is that how this all works?

What do we talk about instead? Watching Ty and TM debate the merits of various NFL contract structures is a lot less interesting then the ppnyc Insanity Theater.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I give the picture to the crowd after the rating. Judge for yourselves.

Those are really good looking dogs. Good work.

[Paisley]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I give the picture to the crowd after the rating. Judge for yourselves.

Adorable. But how does the Displaced Dog keep from running into things? I feel the need to send barrettes.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
There was no attempt there. Aniston v. Jolie? That's "cute" versus "classically gorgeous." Jolie just took what she wanted.

FWIW, and no one cares except possibly Hank, I'd rather be with (in the longer-term sense) the guy analog of Aniston than the guy analog of Jolie. Aniston seems very approachable and like you can talk to her and like she's just, well, nice. Angelina is nice and polite but seems more demanding.

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I give the picture to the crowd after the rating. Judge for yourselves.

[displaced doggies] She has more dreads now.

The one on the left is adorable. But the one on the right needs to work out.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
FWIW, and no one cares except possibly Hank, I'd rather be with (in the longer-term sense) the guy analog of Aniston than the guy analog of Jolie. Aniston seems very approachable and like you can talk to her and like she's just, well, nice. Angelina is nice and polite but seems more demanding.

I'm a submissive.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield

It ain't real swagger if you have to buy it.

If you can buy enough of it, it doesnt' matter if its real, see Trump.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
FWIW, and no one cares except possibly Hank, I'd rather be with (in the longer-term sense) the guy analog of Aniston than the guy analog of Jolie. Aniston seems very approachable and like you can talk to her and like she's just, well, nice. Angelina is nice and polite but seems more demanding.

I'm more like the guy analog of Calamity Jane on deadwood.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Angelina is nice and polite but seems more demanding.

And she's reputed to be batshit crazy.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Football stadiums are expensive facilities that get used rarely. There are a lot of other expenses. Schools like to talk about all the scholarships they're giving, etc., but I've heard that the athletic departments end up keeping all the money -- i.e., spending it on themselves.

Professional teams have stadiums that are expensive and rarely used. There are a lot of expenses there as well, but they make HUGE profits. You're nuts if you don't think the big college football programs don't make huge profits as well.

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
In large part. In college football is so lucrative, why are most of the top college football programs run by the government? That doesn't seem funny to you?

Honestly? Not really. I think it's part of the unique circumstances of how these schools have grown, generally. States have big schools with many students. Their programs have grown over the years because of that. Now, huge money is made and they pack these huge stadiums. They have built-in fan bases in the alumni and tradition plays a huge role.

TM

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'm a submissive.

I think that would bore Angelina and she would get up and leave mid-lick.

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
FWIW, and no one cares except possibly Hank, I'd rather be with (in the longer-term sense) the guy analog of Aniston than the guy analog of Jolie. Aniston seems very approachable and like you can talk to her and like she's just, well, nice. Angelina is nice and polite but seems more demanding.

See, your radar is all off, or you're confusing Aniston with ncs. I look at Jennifer Aniston and think, "Wow, that's a high maintenance chick. She may act nice, but you can just tell she's a pain in the ass." Whereas with Jolie, she's a nutbag, and you know that, and she doesn't pull any punches. Jolie also seems to actually demonstrate that she cares about people other than herself (like her kids or Cambodia/Africa), so even though she's a nutbag, she's a caring nutbag.

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
What do we talk about instead? Watching Ty and TM debate the merits of various NFL contract structures is a lot less interesting then the ppnyc Insanity Theater.

The Internet is for porn.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...27974645&hl=en


RT those are adorable dogs.