» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 312 |
0 members and 312 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
07-15-2005, 01:12 PM
|
#4036
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I read today that Rove learned about Plame from Novak. He did not use classified access, probably becuase the information was not classified.
I'm prepared to call for Rove's ouster if the facts support it. They simply don't at this point.
|
2.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:14 PM
|
#4037
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I read today that Rove learned about Plame from Novak.
|
Not precisely. Apparently, Rove learned it earlier, and confirmed it for Novak.
- The lawyer, who has knowledge of the conversations between Rove and prosecutors, said President Bush's deputy chief of staff has told investigators that he first learned about the operative from a journalist and that he later learned her name from Novak.
Rove has said he does not recall who the journalist was who first told him that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, or when the conversation occurred, the lawyer said.
...
The new account means that Rove talked to both of the journalists who are known to have published original accounts about Plame. Rove's representatives have said that he mentioned the issue in the most general terms and did not name Plame. Democrats say he was trying to fuel stories that would punish an administration critic.
The lawyer said Novak had telephoned Rove to discuss another column, about Frances Fragos Townsend, who had been named deputy national security adviser for terrorism in May 2003. That column ran in Novak's home paper, the Chicago Sun-Times, on July 10, 2003, under the headline "Bush sets himself up for another embarrassment."
At the end of that 15- or 20-minute call, according to the lawyer, Novak said he had learned that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
"I heard that, too," Rove replied, according to the lawyer, confirming the Times account.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:20 PM
|
#4038
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,276
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Not precisely. Apparently, Rove learned it earlier, and confirmed it for Novak.
- The lawyer, who has knowledge of the conversations between Rove and prosecutors, said President Bush's deputy chief of staff has told investigators that he first learned about the operative from a journalist and that he later learned her name from Novak.
Rove has said he does not recall who the journalist was who first told him that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, or when the conversation occurred, the lawyer said.
...
The new account means that Rove talked to both of the journalists who are known to have published original accounts about Plame. Rove's representatives have said that he mentioned the issue in the most general terms and did not name Plame. Democrats say he was trying to fuel stories that would punish an administration critic.
The lawyer said Novak had telephoned Rove to discuss another column, about Frances Fragos Townsend, who had been named deputy national security adviser for terrorism in May 2003. That column ran in Novak's home paper, the Chicago Sun-Times, on July 10, 2003, under the headline "Bush sets himself up for another embarrassment."
At the end of that 15- or 20-minute call, according to the lawyer, Novak said he had learned that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
"I heard that, too," Rove replied, according to the lawyer, confirming the Times account.
|
What is it with all these leaks from the grand jury? Goddamnit Fitzgerald, there's another leak to plug. You're never going to make it back to Chicago to appeal that drug case properly. Congress is so disappointed.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:24 PM
|
#4039
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Not precisely. Apparently, Rove learned it earlier, and confirmed it for Novak.
- The lawyer, who has knowledge of the conversations between Rove and prosecutors, said President Bush's deputy chief of staff has told investigators that he first learned about the operative from a journalist and that he later learned her name from Novak.
Rove has said he does not recall who the journalist was who first told him that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, or when the conversation occurred, the lawyer said.
...
The new account means that Rove talked to both of the journalists who are known to have published original accounts about Plame. Rove's representatives have said that he mentioned the issue in the most general terms and did not name Plame. Democrats say he was trying to fuel stories that would punish an administration critic.
The lawyer said Novak had telephoned Rove to discuss another column, about Frances Fragos Townsend, who had been named deputy national security adviser for terrorism in May 2003. That column ran in Novak's home paper, the Chicago Sun-Times, on July 10, 2003, under the headline "Bush sets himself up for another embarrassment."
At the end of that 15- or 20-minute call, according to the lawyer, Novak said he had learned that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
"I heard that, too," Rove replied, according to the lawyer, confirming the Times account.
|
I am sensing that, for better or worse, the Rove story will die before Rehnquist breathes his last.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:24 PM
|
#4040
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
What is it with all these leaks from the grand jury? Goddamnit Fitzgerald, there's another leak to plug. You're never going to make it back to Chicago to appeal that drug case properly. Congress is so disappointed.
|
Why do you think the leaks are coming from the prosecution instead of the various defense lawyers? Fitzgerald has been running a tight ship up until now, and the article Gatti linked to makes perfect sense if you assume the lawyer who was the source is Rove's lawyer.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:27 PM
|
#4041
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Dykes on Bikes
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
And some hack in the PTO makes a judgment call as to what is offensive?
|
It's subject to judicial review, where some hack makes another judgment call.
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:28 PM
|
#4042
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
Dykes on Bikes
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
It's subject to judicial review, where some hack makes another judgment call.
|
Sounds kind of like an eminent domain proceeding.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:28 PM
|
#4043
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
What is it with all these leaks from the grand jury? Goddamnit Fitzgerald, there's another leak to plug. You're never going to make it back to Chicago to appeal that drug case properly. Congress is so disappointed.
|
I guess it's 2 to ty, but of course this leak is from Rove--he's got another spin, which is he heard it from Novak. Presumably it took until now to confirm with Novak that that's what he told the grand jury as well.
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:29 PM
|
#4044
|
In my dreams ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
2.
|
Dissent. Whether he violated the statute or outed her, knowingly or not, he almost certainly violated his security clearance by talking to reporters about her status at all (even just confirming what they already knew or discussing what he had heard from other reporters and therefore thought was already public), and demonstrated extremely poor judgment in permitting this situation to arise. On the bad judgment point alone he should go. There really should be zero tolerance for these sorts of fuck ups at his level of responsibility in the admin.
I really hope that W's vaunted loyalty doesn't cause him to mess this up and try to keep him, but I'm not confident. If Rove wants what's good for the admin, he'll resign before he's under even more of a cloud.
More interesting is the question of who is the other leak? At best you have one leak and one moron who validated the leak through stupidity, at worst you have a conspiracy of leaks, which could be very, very damaging for an admin trying to conduct what is at heart a covert war.
That said, and completely irrelevant to the points above, Wilson sure is a distasteful little shit.
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:30 PM
|
#4045
|
Serenity Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
|
Dykes on Bikes
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
It's subject to judicial review, where some hack makes another judgment call.
|
And what is the rationale for not offering protection for "offensive" marks? We protect all sorts of "offensive" material and speach.
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:32 PM
|
#4046
|
Serenity Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
Dissent. Whether he violated the statute or outed her, knowingly or not, he almost certainly violated his security clearance by talking to reporters about her status at all (even just confirming what they already knew or discussing what he had heard from other reporters and therefore thought was already public), and demonstrated extremely poor judgment in permitting this situation to arise.
|
Her status wasn't classified, so how did he violate his clearance?
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:35 PM
|
#4047
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
"Hack" Wilson keeps talking
Quote:
Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
. If Rove wants what's good for the admin, he'll resign before he's under even more of a cloud.
.
|
AGREED. 2. CONCUR. Sadly, much as neither side of the aisle produces statesman anymore (since Reagan), the people the pols surround themselves with have no sense of principle or higher duty. I don't know how the Baby Jesus feels about it, but I weep.
Quote:
Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
That said, and completely irrelevant to the points above, Wilson sure is a distasteful little shit.
|
AGREED. 2. CONCUR. Hopefully the two Plames can crawl back under whatever rock they came out from under. Good riddance.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:37 PM
|
#4048
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
bababooeeiii
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
We protect all sorts of "offensive" material and speach.
|
Call Howard Stern and let him know all is forgiven.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#4049
|
Southern charmer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
|
Dykes on Bikes
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
And what is the rationale for not offering protection for "offensive" marks? We protect all sorts of "offensive" material and speach.
|
You'd have to ask the authors of the Lanham Act, but I'd imagine that as a matter of public policy they'd point to a distinction between restricting the government's ability to limit offensive speech versus the government offering affirmative rights to enable people to profit from it.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
|
|
|
07-15-2005, 01:42 PM
|
#4050
|
WacKtose Intolerant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
|
Dykes on Bikes
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
You'd have to ask the authors of the Lanham Act, but I'd imagine that as a matter of public policy they'd point to a distinction between restricting the government's ability to limit offensive speech versus the government offering affirmative rights to enable people to profit from it.
|
[family feud cheer] Good answer! good answer![/family feud cheer].
It's posts like this that illustrate why you make the big Penskebucks.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|