Fashion Board 2-3-04 to 3-5-04 - Page 279

notcasesensitive · 03-01-2004, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I think its just that he's nearing that milestone, you know, and he's looking for a way to make it a pleasant journey there...

what better way to get to your own personal k than a flame war with Hank? (It's how I hope mine goes down.)

I also heard a rumor that he fell off of the Rageaholics Anonymous wagon. Raging like a motherfucker lately.

bold_n_brazen · 03-01-2004, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
Indeed. We all know you are the one who brags about your chest. I merely make fun of mine, and sometimes complain about it. I brag about other things.

You'd think after all this time he'd get it right.

Yeah. Especially after you slept with his momma...

spookyfish · 03-01-2004, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Somebody* is very cranky today. And, as a result, somebody* has misplaced his sense of humor.

*by "somebody", I mean you.

Oh, please. Am I going to be forced to start using these

again?

leagleaze · 03-01-2004, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Yeah. Especially after you slept with his momma...

Is she one of the women I'm dating? I suppose that would explain why he is so bitter.

Please, no

bold_n_brazen · 03-01-2004, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sunnybunny
You shut up too...Mr. Pissing in the gene pool. Playing a mentally challenged individual is harder than playing a gelfling or hobbit or whatever those things were....and half the otehr crap for which people get nominated. speaking of which, I find it very curious that a film that lacked any stand out acting performances could still so solidly sweep the oscars.

No. He was right when he told you to shut up. Playing a retard requires no nuance.

It was only when he started arguing with Hank that he went all wrong.

bold_n_brazen · 03-01-2004, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
Oh, please. Am I going to be forced to start using these

again?

Please don't. For the love of Fred*, please don't.

*I do this only to annoy TM.**
**I do this only to annoy Paigow.

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 03-01-2004, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Somebody* is very cranky today. And, as a result, somebody* has misplaced his sense of humor.

*by "somebody", I mean you.

Actually, I think it's a joke. And I'm probably the only one who gets it since I'm the only one who reads my own posts.

Unless I'm completely whiffing here. If so, I don't give a shit and am cooler than all of you.

Sidd Finch · 03-01-2004, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
Sorry, but I'm not especially impressed by actors who take on mentally challenged roles. I've seen too many actors of varying skill levels do it too well.

Except Leo DiCaprio, in Gilbert Grape. The movie that proved he was actually an actor.

spookyfish · 03-01-2004, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Except Leo DiCaprio, in Gilbert Grape. The movie that proved he was actually an actor.

Beg to differ, I think that is an example of the exception that proves the rule.

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 03-01-2004, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
No. He was right when he told you to shut up. Playing a retard requires no nuance.

Agreed. Half of my (uncouth, of course) high school pals had dead-on retard impressions.

bilmore · 03-01-2004, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I think its just that he's nearing that milestone, you know, and he's looking for a way to make it a pleasant journey there...

Spooky's menopausal?

notcasesensitive · 03-01-2004, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Except Leo DiCaprio, in Gilbert Grape. The movie that proved he was actually an actor.

I'll admit that I thought Dustin Hoffman was very good in Rainman. He resisted to urge to chew all over the scenery and went with less is more as opposed to, say, Tom Hanks as Forrest Gump.

I do agree that the Hollywood tendency is to overreward those playing the dim-witted characters in movies. I couple this with the reward beautiful women for looking ugly phenomenon of recent years.

spookyfish · 03-01-2004, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I also heard a rumor that he fell off of the Rageaholics Anonymous wagon. Raging like a motherfucker lately.

You haven't heard the half of it.

robustpuppy · 03-01-2004, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Agreed. Half of my (uncouth, of course) high school pals had dead-on retard impressions.

Having had you in their own social group no doubt helped them.

leagleaze · 03-01-2004, 03:27 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/South/03/....ap/index.html

Tickets at one movie theater screening Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" are being deemed decidedly unholy.

The number 666, which many Christians recognize as the "mark of the beast," is appearing on movie tickets for Gibson's film at a Georgia theater, drawing complaints from some moviegoers.

The machine that prints tickets assigned the number 666 as a prefix on all the tickets for the film, said Gary Smith, owner of the Movies at Berry Square in northwest Georgia. The 666 begins a series of numbers that are listed below the name of the movie, the date, time and price.