Waiting for Fitzgerald

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I'll charitably assume that you did not understand what I was getting at with the post to which you initially responded.

I also find it strange -- though not completely insulting -- that you equate my politics with those of George Carlin.

On your Penske point -- this is a strange conversation to have, but the analogy only works if "we" constantly brought up Pres. Reagan, the jelly beans, Nancy Reagan, Iran-Contra, the astrologer, and RR's likely illness for the last two years of his office (for example) at every opportunity -- and kept hammering away at those items as purported substantive responses to issues of the day, as Penske does with the Clintons (sorry, Clintoons).

That is different than making some of the same arguments, with some of the same themes, about and against policies of the Bush II administration which some "liberals" may have made about and against Reagan back in the day. That simply shows ideological consistency. I'd wager that some of the conservative talking points from the Carter days showed up again during the Clinton years.

S_A_M

The difference is Reagan effected positive lasting change on both the domestic and international front. Clinton's legacy is perjury, sexual harassment, failed healthcare initiative; attempt to conspire with a babykilling terrorist to cement the second genocide of the jews and 3000 Americans dead.

[SlaveNoMore]

spookyfish
But I honestly don't get how the term "Scalito" is seen as a racist or ethnic insult...

Me either.

The anti-Catholic vitriol I read on Kos, however, is disgusting.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Nut Penske

Ha. Funny. Last laugh will be when Alito is sitting on the court in '06 to cast a decisive vote in a 5-4 decision upholding parental notice/consent laws related to abortion. Ha ha ha.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Not Bob
I don't read Kos, but good for the second half. This is a non-partisan phenomenon, btw. The fringes (not you, fringey, baby) on both sides regularly make racist comments about nominees. From Bill Lann Lee, to Clarence Thomas, Scalia, Ginsberg -- it's all too common.

I'm Not Italian (NTTAWWT), but it seems like any successful Italian American lawyer/politician/businessperson gets tagged with the Mafia label. WTF? I'm beginning to think that Melfi's ex-husband had a point.

That's the racism of liberalism. It's okay though because Italian Americans are no longer loyal to the plantation of the dimwits, so their collective reputations are expendable.

Congrats on ingraining that prejudice in the system. Thankfully there are people like Alito, Scalia and Jeanine Pirro who blow it away.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Me either.

The anti-Catholic vitriol I read on Kos, however, is disgusting.

Liberals hate the babyjesuschristsuperstar and all of his earthly representatives. the faithful are freaks to the leftists.

[Captain]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Me either.

The anti-Catholic vitriol I read on Kos, however, is disgusting.

Unfortunately, I think anonymous posting on internet fora tends to let the worst in people come out. I am always surprised at some of the things I see here, but if we accept the idea that the board will not be heavily moderated, there is always someone who decides it can be a place to vent their ugly side. It is the same at Kos or anywhere.

I suspect anti-Catholic vitriol and worse is in the hearts of more than a few on both sides of the ideological debate. But I find it somewhat comforting that the born-again right wing in America is looking so heavily to Catholic jurists for jurisprudential guidance. That in itself is an achievement.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Captain
Unfortunately, I think anonymous posting on internet fora tends to let the worst in people come out. I am always surprised at some of the things I see here, but if we accept the idea that the board will not be heavily moderated, there is always someone who decides it can be a place to vent their ugly side. It is the same at Kos or anywhere.

2.

The Kos Kids and the DUmmies are the worst of the excesses that the First Amendment allows. thankfully most of those socialist bloviaters are doomed to a life of abject loserdom, thus it is unlikely I will ever encounter any of them. i.r.l.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Me either.

The anti-Catholic vitriol I read on Kos, however, is disgusting.

Speaking of disgusting, take at look at the vile filthy comments CBSNews made about Alito.

The rot of liberalism is near complete.

CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the President’s selection of Judge Samuel Alito as “sloppy seconds” during today’s press gaggle with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

John Roberts: “So, Scott, you said that -- or the President said, repeatedly, that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job. So does that mean that Alito is sloppy seconds, or what?”

Scott McClellan: “Not at all, John.”

Sloppy seconds” is described in the United Kingdom’s A Dictionary of Slang as:

Noun: “A subsequent indulgence in an activity by a second person involving an exchange of bodily fluids. This may involve the sharing of drink, or more often it applies to a sexual nature. E.g. ‘I’m not having sloppy seconds, I want to shag her first.’”

[SlaveNoMore]

Captain
But I find it somewhat comforting that the born-again right wing in America is looking so heavily to Catholic jurists for jurisprudential guidance. That in itself is an achievement.

Papists rock!!!

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Speaking of disgusting, take at look at the vile filthy comments CBSNews made about Alito.

The rot of liberalism is near complete.

CBSNEWS Chief White House correspondent John Roberts described the President’s selection of Judge Samuel Alito as “sloppy seconds” during today’s press gaggle with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

John Roberts: “So, Scott, you said that -- or the President said, repeatedly, that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job. So does that mean that Alito is sloppy seconds, or what?”

Scott McClellan: “Not at all, John.”

Sloppy seconds” is described in the United Kingdom’s A Dictionary of Slang as:

Noun: “A subsequent indulgence in an activity by a second person involving an exchange of bodily fluids. This may involve the sharing of drink, or more often it applies to a sexual nature. E.g. ‘I’m not having sloppy seconds, I want to shag her first.’”

Penske, my man. And what of the reference in July 2004 by a spokeswoman for the Repub Nat'l Committee (Tara Wall -- below) of John Kerry's choice of Edwards as "sloppy seconds"? Maybe Drudge should be linking to that video clip in the same article.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Penske, my man. And what of the reference in July 2004 by a spokeswoman for the Repub Nat'l Committee (Tara Wall -- below) of John Kerry's choice of Edwards as "sloppy seconds"? Maybe Drudge should be linking to that video clip in the same article.

Yes, but with those two, the term, in its slang sense and as double entendre, was more appropriate. No?

[Anntila the Hun]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Penske, my man. And what of the reference in July 2004 by a spokeswoman for the Repub Nat'l Committee (Tara Wall -- below) of John Kerry's choice of Edwards as "sloppy seconds"? Maybe Drudge should be linking to that video clip in the same article.

You infidel-loving socialistic bloated limousine liberal media-loving should just shut TF up and let the adults run the country, like they have been. I guess it escaped your notice that Tara is a freedom-loving card carrying proud American. Besides, have you ever seen Kerry and Edwards eating together? "Sloppy" doesn't begin to describe it.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Anntila the Hun
Besides, have you ever seen Kerry and Edwards eating together? "Sloppy" doesn't begin to describe it.

Really sloppy PDA....

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Really sloppy PDA....

That's one advantage Cheney enjoyed. Nobody would ever put up a page like that with Dicky. Even in an internet world riddled with man-on-dog porn, some things just aren't done.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
That's one advantage Cheney enjoyed. Nobody would ever put up a page like that with Dicky. Even in an internet world riddled with man-on-dog porn, some things just aren't done.

the dimwits leave themselves open for it.......