Meet your new thread, same as the old thread.

[Diane_Keaton]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I would like to know whether the students were Muslims. Are they all going to Hell for suggesting that name? What's their jail sentence going to be?

Although, as a prank for getting back at a teacher, this is going to be hard to top.

I like how the Sudanese government has been "unable" to find even 1 person to prosecute for the genocide in Darfur going on now for 4 years, but in 2 days it charged, prosecuted and sentenced the Teddy Bear lady. I have to wonder about the thousands of Sudanese Arabs crying out for the execution of the lady with the Teddy Bear:




Can someone find a pic of Arab protesters objecting to the slaughter of those they refer to as “slaves”? No, I didn't think so. BTW, nobody knows if there is oil in Sudan so why is it exactly that we are giving aid to a government that is clearly protecting the slaughterers? Because China and Sudan are trading buddies and we don't want to piss of China? Really, I'd love to know. If someone could explain, without use of the bullshit word "stablize" or any variation of it, I'm all ears.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The Mason-Dixon line is a fictional line

This is redundant. All lines are fictional. I learned this in math. Except the part about Soviet bread lines being fictional -- that I learned in history. AMDG.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
This is redundant. All lines are fictional. I learned this in math. Except the part about Soviet bread lines being fictional -- that I learned in history. AMDG.

I know you know strings are real, and can be made straight and taunt.




Eva Silverstein with her favorite equations

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
This is redundant. All lines are fictional.

Don't tell Paris Hilton.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I know you know strings are real, and can be made straight and taunt.




Eva Silverstein with her favorite equations

Did Eva's people finally send you a TRO?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by LessinSF
True, but nothing tops the 53 year-old prophet Muhammed fucking his 9 year-old wife Aisha. Precocious little harlot her.

You've got it all backwards. They're more progressive and tolerant than troglodytes like us:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4748292.stm

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You've got it all backwards. They're more progressive and tolerant than troglodytes like us:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4748292.stm

I'm reading a book about Bombay right now, and it touches on the riots in 1992-93 in which Hindus killed a bunch of Moslems. It's not like Islam is the only religion which can be used to whip a bunch of poor people into a frenzy so that they won't notice that their government isn't doing anything for them. At least no one in Khartoum was burning their neighbors alive, as happened in Bombay. This time, anyway.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm reading a book about Bombay right now, and it touches on the riots in 1992-93 in which Hindus killed a bunch of Moslems. It's not like Islam is the only religion which can be used to whip a bunch of poor people into a frenzy so that they won't notice that their government isn't doing anything for them. At least no one in Khartoum was burning their neighbors alive, as happened in Bombay. This time, anyway.

Are those the riots where the Hindus stopped a train and set it on fire? I read a horrific story about some action of that sort, but I'm struggling to place the time of the event.

Anyway, I of course agree, Islam is not alone in creating violence. And I thought the goat wedding showed its seldom seen tolerant side.

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Are those the riots where the Hindus stopped a train and set it on fire? I read a horrific story about some action of that sort, but I'm struggling to place the time of the event.

Anyway, I of course agree, Islam is not alone in creating violence. And I thought the goat wedding showed its seldom seen tolerant side.

It was not widely reported, but later the goat's brothers stoned her to death for having intercourse prior to marriage and shaming the herd. Animals.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Are those the riots where the Hindus stopped a train and set it on fire? I read a horrific story about some action of that sort, but I'm struggling to place the time of the event.

Here is Wikipedia:

• Although numerous riots have occurred in the City of Mumbai, India (Bombay) since Independence, the Bombay Riots usually refers to the riots in Mumbai, in December 1992 and January 1993, in which 900 people died. This was followed by the 12 March 1993 Bombay Bombings, allegedly orchestrated by ganglord Dawood Ibrahim and his D-Company syndicate, in which 250 people died.
  
  The riots started as a result of communal tension prevailing in the city after the Babri Mosque demolition on 6 December 1992. It is commonly believed that the riots occurred in two phases. The first was mainly a Muslim backlash as a result of the Babri Masjid demolition in the week immediately succeeding 6 December 1992 by Hindu nationalists in the city of Ayodhya.
  
  The second phase was a Hindu backlash occurring as a result of the killings of Hindu Mathadi Kamgar (Workers) by Muslims in Dongri (an area of South Mumbai). This phase occurred in January 1993 (most incidents reported between 6 January to 20 January).
  
  Overall around 900 people were killed in these riots. Arson, killings and the destruction of property occurred in distinctively different kinds of areas. The areas of Pydhonie, Dongri, Agripada, Gamdevi, V.P.Road, Byculla, Bhoiwada, Nagpada, Kherwadi, Nehru Nagar, Dharavi, Ghatkopar, Kurla, Deonar, Trombay, Bandra, Vakola and Jogeshwari were largely affected amongst others. Violence affected not only slums but also apartment blocks and chawls.

The book I'm reading (Maximum City -- it's excellent) has a number of stories that are just awful. People who described to the author pouring gasoline on their neighbors and burning them alive in the street. The book also makes it clear that these aren't necessarily devout Hindus, and that they were whipped up by politicians. So I'm just thinking that whoever got the Sudanese going about the teddy bear probably had their own agenda, and that it doesn't necessarily have much to do with religion.

You have my proxy on matters relating to goat weddings.

eta: In contradistinction to the Wikipedia entry, the author (a Hindu) says that the Bombay riots were whipped up by the Sena party, which was allied with the BJP, and that Moslems were generally the victims -- no suprise, as they are the minority in Bombay. It would appear that whoever wrote the above was trying to make it sound even-handed.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by ironweed
It was not widely reported, but later the goat's brothers stoned her to death for having intercourse prior to marriage and shaming the herd. Animals.

Disgusting. Reports I found indicate the stoning went on for three days, hooves being terribly suited for picking up rocks.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Here is Wikipedia:

• Although numerous riots have occurred in the City of Mumbai, India (Bombay) since Independence, the Bombay Riots usually refers to the riots in Mumbai, in December 1992 and January 1993, in which 900 people died. This was followed by the 12 March 1993 Bombay Bombings, allegedly orchestrated by ganglord Dawood Ibrahim and his D-Company syndicate, in which 250 people died.
  
  The riots started as a result of communal tension prevailing in the city after the Babri Mosque demolition on 6 December 1992. It is commonly believed that the riots occurred in two phases. The first was mainly a Muslim backlash as a result of the Babri Masjid demolition in the week immediately succeeding 6 December 1992 by Hindu nationalists in the city of Ayodhya.
  
  The second phase was a Hindu backlash occurring as a result of the killings of Hindu Mathadi Kamgar (Workers) by Muslims in Dongri (an area of South Mumbai). This phase occurred in January 1993 (most incidents reported between 6 January to 20 January).
  
  Overall around 900 people were killed in these riots. Arson, killings and the destruction of property occurred in distinctively different kinds of areas. The areas of Pydhonie, Dongri, Agripada, Gamdevi, V.P.Road, Byculla, Bhoiwada, Nagpada, Kherwadi, Nehru Nagar, Dharavi, Ghatkopar, Kurla, Deonar, Trombay, Bandra, Vakola and Jogeshwari were largely affected amongst others. Violence affected not only slums but also apartment blocks and chawls.

The book I'm reading (Maximum City -- it's excellent) has a number of stories that are just awful. People who described to the author pouring gasoline on their neighbors and burning them alive in the street. The book also makes it clear that these aren't necessarily devout Hindus, and that they were whipped up by politicians. So I'm just thinking that whoever got the Sudanese going about the teddy bear probably had their own agenda, and that it doesn't necessarily have much to do with religion.

You have my proxy on matters relating to goat weddings.

eta: In contradistinction to the Wikipedia entry, the author (a Hindu) says that the Bombay riots were whipped up by the Sena party, which was allied with the BJP, and that Moslems were generally the victims -- no suprise, as they are the minority in Bombay. It would appear that whoever wrote the above was trying to make it sound even-handed.

I think all of the instances are deplorable. We are how many years from the dark ages? Religion does not get a pass here. It's the instrument of manipulation, as culpable as the people who use it for these ends.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Egg on the National Review's face, I tell you what. Let's see how exercized the wingnuts get.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm reading a book about Bombay right now, and it touches on the riots in 1992-93 in which Hindus killed a bunch of Moslems. It's not like Islam is the only religion which can be used to whip a bunch of poor people into a frenzy so that they won't notice that their government isn't doing anything for them. At least no one in Khartoum was burning their neighbors alive, as happened in Bombay. This time, anyway.

When you start arguing whether hacking people to death with a machete is less savage than burning them alive, you have already lost your argument.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Egg on the National Review's face, I tell you what. Let's see how exercized the wingnuts get.

Oh, come on, the Right gets most of its news from Fox and you're worried about a National Review blogger lying?

This is like Democrats who inhale - not news.