The New And Improved Fashion Board

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
The Wenger Swiss Army watch that I'm pimping is in your price range and also able to sustain whirled peas being mushed onto it. It is also comfortable to wear when exercising. They make other models if the tank style doesn't light your fire.

Gwinky likes to visualize whirled peas. I myself prefer to be more active and I am actually trying hard to stop the violins.

Carry on. (Hi, ncs, you bitter old crone!)

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I am generally wnarky because I have had a bad relationship history. Dumped a lot for strippers and models. Also possibly there was incest.*

I recalled the discussion being that they break a lot and are lower quality than most other brands (as well as being a bad value, of course). But I didn't go back and review the old posts, so I won't quibble. Tiger Woods likes them at least. And he's never led me astray with his Buick recommendations.




*this is hard to throw in even as a joke. some people are pretty whacked.

Why would you care what people think about the brand of your watch? Yeah, TAG has blown its load in terms of popularity but if it a good watch, wear it in good health...I wear lots of things that could be contstrued as out of style. Talbot's shoes are a good exmple, total old lady flats but comfy as hell, I really just don't care.

Hey NCS ---thanks! Happy holidays. It was partially intentiona;l [I've really tried] partially unintentional [it has been busy as hell year end] but the bottom line is I've really made an effort to not post as much....

[notcasesensitive]

I would like to point out that ppnyc has lived up to her bargain on this board to date. Significantly fewer posts than Hank. Right in the range of fringey and sebby. Well done, ppnyc.

(now don't go and post 100 posts in a row right now or we could have some trouble.)

I think she took her inspiration from the name of the board, but maybe I'm biased.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Why would you care what people think about the brand of your watch? ... I really just don't care.

Not one person you've ever come in contact with, even for a moment,* believes this. And neither do you.

TM

*And that's a lot of people because, well, you're fat.

[Adder]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Why would you care what people think about the brand of your watch? Yeah, TAG has blown its load in terms of popularity but if it a good watch, wear it in good health...I wear lots of things that could be contstrued as out of style. Talbot's shoes are a good exmple, total old lady flats but comfy as hell, I really just don't care.

You know, just yesterday I was contemplating whether the woman in front of me in the check out lane at Whole foods was attractive. After having initially decided no, I thought a second look was in order as she kept turning around to look at me. Until I saw her shoes. One look at those babies and I knew that there was no way she was attractive.

That's when I knew I was gay (or at least destined for the male version of spinsterhood).

The looked something like this:

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Not one person you've ever come in contact with, even for a moment,* believes this. And neither do you.

TM

*And that's a lot of people because, well, you're fat.

For your sake, I hope she's not your Secret Santa this year.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by Adder
You know, just yesterday I was contemplating whether the woman in front of me in the check out lane at Whole foods was attractive. After having initially decided no, I thought a second look was in order as she kept turning around to look at me. Until I saw her shoes. One look at those babies and I knew that there was no way she was attractive.

That's when I knew I was gay (or at least destined for the male version of spinsterhood).

The looked something like this:

You reject women based on their shoes? and lack thereof of stylishness??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Okay I will give you one thing. Black sneakers on men are a turn off. is that the old lady shoe male equiv??

[Adder]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
You reject women based on their shoes? and lack thereof of stylishness??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and you call ME vapid/shallow/lame?

I reject people that I don't know and haven't talked to based on whatever happens to piss me off first. Giving my general surliness, it could be any number of things. In your case, it was because you are vapid, shallow and lame.

In her case, it was the combination of my general annoyance at being out in public, having to interact with the unwashed masses, and wearing some seriously ugly shoes.

Btw, for future reference, using more punctuation does not lend greater depth to any given observation.

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by Adder
I reject people that I don't know and haven't talked to based on whatever happens to piss me off first. Giving my general surliness, it could be any number of things. In your case, it was because you are vapid, shallow and lame.

In her case, it was the combination of my general annoyance at being out in public, having to interact with the unwashed masses, and wearing some seriously ugly shoes.

Btw, for future reference, using more punctuation does not lend greater depth to any given observation.

Given!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by Adder
I reject people that I don't know and haven't talked to based on whatever happens to piss me off first. Giving my general surliness, it could be any number of things. In your case, it was because you are vapid, shallow and lame.

In her case, it was the combination of my general annoyance at being out in public, having to interact with the unwashed masses, and wearing some seriously ugly shoes.

Btw, for future reference, using more punctuation does not lend greater depth to any given observation.

I thought it was "churlishness."

Poor, poor Adder. Having to venture out into the great wide open that is Whole Foods and having to deal with people! The horror.....I feel so sorry for you.

re: GMILF. Just ewwwww.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Adder
I reject people that I don't know and haven't talked to based on whatever happens to piss me off first.

What amazes me is that you noticed the shoes before realizing a grandmother was checking you out.

GMILF?

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
I thought it was "churlishness."

It is when you are describing yourself.

[Adder]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
I thought it was "churlishness."

You know, there are a number of good, free dictionaries available on the interwebs. You might want to check one of them out.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I would like to point out that ppnyc has lived up to her bargain on this board to date. Significantly fewer posts than Hank. Right in the range of fringey and sebby. Well done, ppnyc.

(now don't go and post 100 posts in a row right now or we could have some trouble.)

I think she took her inspiration from the name of the board, but maybe I'm biased.

Before we get too excited, let's recall that this was the thread in which she retired.

[pussycat]

Originally posted by Adder
I reject people that I don't know and haven't talked to based on whatever happens to piss me off first. Giving my general surliness, it could be any number of things. In your case, it was because you are vapid, shallow and lame.

In her case, it was the combination of my general annoyance at being out in public, having to interact with the unwashed masses, and wearing some seriously ugly shoes.

Btw, for future reference, using more punctuation does not lend greater depth to any given observation.

Maybe you are intimidated by the aura of our powerful vaginas. Do you find you need viagra to close the deal?