imaginary friends to fill the void that is your gaping gash.

Originally posted by ltl/fb
She'll be laughing too hard that you think her breasts are real.

http://www.goodplasticsurgery.com/archives/005459.html

Thanks for the assist. I got interrrupted. But you konw what Sebby will say. Its a foul truth he speaks but everyone here will mainly agree that he is mostly correct that you malign perfect natural tits by saying they are fake bc yoiu are a bitter flatchested spinster cow.

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
They're all delusional-

I went to see MSU v. Michigan play (hockey) at Joe Louis Arena two weeks ago. Every bar near there, every parking lot all the people who work at JLA selling crap- have all been screwed by this. Tons of people who are trying to pay rent are going broke because players who are great in a sport that people won't watch on TV, think they deserve millions of $$ a year. Maybe expansion makde it worse, I don't know- but it just seems like these guys rolled some big dice and lost. Several Wings are playing for a semi-pro team at an arena that holds 1500- how does the old 8 million a year sound now?

The saddest thing I heard was the goalie for Michigan apparently could have left last year and signed for a big bonus, but he decided to return for his senior year- and now he'll graduate and get ????

Were there clear signals this was heading this way?

Riddle me this, when you get done sucking the invisible hand's dick: who's signing these contracts to pay them these salaries.? And who's stating and restating their revenue like The Bluth Company? And who's expanding?

From a guy who doesn't even understand icing, it seems to me like the players are a lot less objectionable than those of almost any other league.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
When you refer to fake tits as fake tits or fakes or fakers, are you insulting their owner? Or is it just what they are called? Like, if I am at a cocktail party with Giselle Bunchen or someone not necessarily with a sense of humor about the subkect (like say Anna Nicole Smith) and I refer to fake tits. Will she be offended

You'll never be at such a cocktail party, so call 'em what you like.

TM

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
When you refer to fake tits as fake tits or fakes or fakers, are you insulting their owner? Or is it just what they are called? Like, if I am at a cocktail party with Giselle Bunchen or someone not necessarily with a sense of humor about the subkect (like say Anna Nicole Smith) and I refer to fake tits. Will she be offended

I'm glad to see that you have such concern for the feelings of the fake-titted.

Originally posted by mmm3587
Riddle me this,

Duuuuuuuuuuude

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I'm glad to see that you have such concern for the feelings of the fake-titted.

I hear the fake-titted lose sensitivity.

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I'm glad to see that you have such concern for the feelings of the fake-titted.

I don't. I just received an IM on the subject.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
When you refer to fake tits as fake tits or fakes or fakers, are you insulting their owner? Or is it just what they are called? Like, if I am at a cocktail party with Giselle Bunchen or someone not necessarily with a sense of humor about the subkect (like say Anna Nicole Smith) and I refer to fake tits. Will she be offended

No. They're fake tits. You're just calling them what they are.

Like Coolies.

I am constantly reminding myself not to use "tits" around certain persnickety women who get their panties in a bunch about such slang. My guess is, if anything were to be deemed offensive, it'd be "tits" rather than "fake". Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.

My posts are really getting worse by the day. And thats unpossible.

[lookingformarket]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
I don't. I just received an IM on the subject.

What kind of pod person would be asking you ettiquette questions?

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No. They're fake tits. You're just calling them what they are.

Like Coolies.

I am constantly reminding myself not to use "tits" around certain persnickety women who get their panties in a bunch about such slang. My guess is, if anything were to be deemed offensive, it'd be "tits" rather than "fake". Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.

My posts are really getting worse by the day. And thats unpossible.

I just think its sad that most coolies cannot afford to be faketitted.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Thanks for the assist. I got interrrupted. But you konw what Sebby will say. Its a foul truth he speaks but everyone here will mainly agree that he is mostly correct that you malign perfect natural tits by saying they are fake bc yoiu are a bitter flatchested spinster cow.

I'm a bitter spinster cow, but, due to my cowlike tendencies, I have discernable udders.

Originally posted by lookingformarket
What kind of pod person would be asking you ettiquette questions?

It wasnt a titiquette question. stop listening to half the conversation.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No. They're fake tits. You're just calling them what they are.

Like Coolies.

I am constantly reminding myself not to use "tits" around certain persnickety women who get their panties in a bunch about such slang. My guess is, if anything were to be deemed offensive, it'd be "tits" rather than "fake". Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.

My posts are really getting worse by the day. And thats unpossible.

You have to be kidding. It's rude to comment on a person's body in his or her presence, regardless of whether they've had work done or not. Some women might reasonably be offended without being considered "persnickety." Even women who don't wear panties.

You don't really believe that the mere fact that a woman has had work means that she has given the world license to address her about it, directly, or even worse, indirectly?

Referring to a woman's tits as fake in her presence is incredibly fucking rude, even if there are women in the world who would not be offended. Not everybody is Jenna Jameson, for god's sake.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
It's expansion that is the problem. Why expand to a place that doesn't care? Fucking Columbus. Phoenix. Florida. Anaheim. San Jose etc

I love you gwink, but that's baloney. Maybe the league charged too much for expansion franchises in the Bettman Era, but that is not the problem.

A large part of the problem is simply that there is a huge disparity in the willingness/ability to pay big bucks between rich and poor teams. Whose fault is that? The Nashville Predators? No.

Another part is the expiration of the ABC/ESPN deal. No big money flowing in anymore, and the new deal sucked becuase ratings sucked. Why did ratings suck? Because the games were not enjoyable to watch for novice fans. Blame the Atlanta Thrashers? Heck, no, they are more fun to watch than the left wing lock using New Jersey Devils. Instead, blame the clutch and grab that isn't called, the goalies who look like Michellin Men, and the rules which seem designed to eliminate offense.

And the argument about talent dilution caused by the Anaheims of the league is misplaced -- the addition of new teams has happened only after the league began to open itself up to players from Europe. This isn't 1967; Khabibulin's not forced to play for the Red Army team, and general managers are willing to sign players who aren't named Claude or Trevor.

Oh, and slave, fuck Goodenow because if you're going to cave for a cap of $49 million, you might as well take a cap of $42 million to save the season.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Thanks for the assist. I got interrrupted. But you konw what Sebby will say. Its a foul truth he speaks but everyone here will mainly agree that he is mostly correct that you malign perfect natural tits by saying they are fake bc yoiu are a bitter flatchested spinster cow.

Nah, I'm a fake tit snob. A bad boob job is like bad hair. It's the wearer's own goddamned fault, and they ought to be ridiculed for being such jackasses.

When you see the surgeon, you should know better than to ask for the Pam Anderson Special.

A pair of massive bulbous orbs stuffed onto a chick should be a ridicule antenna.

But a well done pair like Brooke Burke's or Gisele's... that should be celebrated. Artwork and such...