New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003

[dtb]

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
drop the gun, take the cannoli.

No, no, no, no, no.... you are conflating two scenes.


It's leave the gun, take the canoli... (after Clemenza and that other dude whack the driver who called in sick)

And "drop the gun" when Mikey gets his instructions on what to do after he whacks the cop and Sollozo.

(It's a common mistake. Could happen to anybody.)

[leagleaze]

Yes, you can also just ask for access here, you don't need to PM me.

You can also ask E/O, Slave or MR to do it. The name of the group is extra, so just ask to be put in that group.

To answer another question, no, no one but the Admins will be able to tell who has access to the adult board.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Please note, not that you probably care at all, that your avatar makes me think you are RT.

To the extent that I care, I will take it as a compliment, but I should make sure State Farm is not under the same impression.

And for the record, that is not my dog. I do not dress my dogs in costumes. I will note, however, that the retro disco look sported by my avatar is much more dignified than, say, a pink princess number.

And to bring up a different kind of beautiful pair, I want these shoes:


I'm obsessed with them. They're not terribly exciting as Manolos go, they're terribly expensive, and they probably hurt, but I want them anyway.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Well, we'll need to post her Playboy pics on the smut page, b/c while her is rack is big, I don't think it's stripper-sized. But I was talking more about the shape than the size of her TITS. They're not perfectly round with nipples pointing upwrd, etc. like a stripper's. They're more naturally shaped. Huge but naturally shaped.

That's the great thing about Brooke's tits - they're conservative and well done. She's voluptuous without any of the ugly "bulbous on top" action.

But after looking at her ass/abs/legs and face, I can unequivocally say, she'd be hotter than hell if she had no tits at all...

S(She's a freak... I can't even look at her without catching semi-wood like a silly fifth grader)D

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Please note, not that you probably care at all, that your avatar makes me think you are RT.

Now you heart us'all?

I guess my 45 minutes are up, just like that!

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I thought black was way expensive and therefore wearing black was a sign of wealth. Am I mistaken?

I think purple was most expensive, but that any color at all was expensive, including black, so color in general would be a sign of wealth.

There were a number of places where sumptuary laws limiting, for example, the wearing of colors, became very extensive, and those are the places where colors were most prestigious. But that tends to be later in the middle ages in places like Northern Italy, rather than in the wild and crazy days of Goths and Huns.

How 'bout Rus fashion? Do you know anything about the Rus?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
They're not perfectly round with nipples pointing upwrd, etc. like a stripper's. They're more naturally shaped. Huge but naturally shaped.

You need to see a better class of stripper.

I mean, that's what I heard.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield

But after looking at her ass/abs/legs and face, I can unequivocally say, she'd be hotter than hell if she had no tits at all...

Yep, they're really just gravy.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
You are being silly. Brooke Burke's rack is HUGE and if her body isn't stripper-ish, I don't know whose is.

[This is not a bad thing]

Brooke Burns is cute. But she's a JV Rebecca. No contest.

Dude, you're usually the voice of reason, but its very obvious on this subject your brain has gone on holiday. Stamos and Burke are a dead heat, and while Stamos may look a tad more natural, Burke hardly looks stripperish. I have seen women who look like Burke with natural boobs... would you call such gifted chicks "naturally stripperish?" One that comes to mind is Selma Hayek.

[leagleaze]

What does a stripper type look like? My next door neighbors just informed me they were strippers, and I wouldn't have had the first clue if they hadn't said they were.

They are both quite attractive, but, I see nothing particularly obvious about them.


And to answer yet another question, no you don't need to be a long time member. The purpose of having it members only and confined to people who want to view it, is just to prevent people from stumbling across it by accident.

If you have never signed up as a member but would like access to the adult board, just sign up and send me a PM (or post here.)

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You need to see a better class of stripper.

This could be true.

Although Shelly from the Million Dollar Club in Windsor would tell me otherwise...

I miss Shelly.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by leagleaze
What does a stripper type look like? My next door neighbors just informed me they were strippers...

Did they just move in? If so, hopefully you'll be writing in to the Penthouse Forum in a month or so.

Is the apartment two down from you available?

[Replaced_Texan]

Uh, is there some sort of flag that you guys can put on the thread titles of the threads with non-IT-nazi friendly pictures inside? I usually just hit the threads in the "active topics," and I don't know necessarily what forum the thread is in. They've been clamping down on porn lately, and I don't want to be caught in the crossfire.

RT

[SlaveNoMore]

sebastian_dangerfield
I have seen women who look like Burke with natural boobs... would you call such gifted chicks "naturally stripperish?"

No, I would usually call them 15 or 16 years old.

[Bad_Rich_Chic]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I thought black was way expensive and therefore wearing black was a sign of wealth. Am I mistaken?

Commonly taught misperception. Black was actually a pretty easy color to produce, and only a middling-expensive dye (though there were "vanity" variants that were mixtures of very expensive dyes). Later middle ages/early renaissance nobility were particularly fond of black, but this was largely a fashion (a "see, I'm so sophisticated and subtle that I will show off my money by wearing all black clothes instead of flashily-dyed fabrics, but they will be expensively woven and cut on the bias so my exquisite taste will only be obvious to the informed observer" sort of a thing).

True reds were quite dear, but it is whites that were nearly unheard of except as overt displays of disposable wealth. White was too hard to keep clean.