Making Baby Jesus Cry

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Depends, assuming you consider the imposition of Shar'ia on what would now be the Islamic Republic of America f/k/a the United States of America to be not as low as GW Bush, I would agree.

At least we've reached some consensus that W sucks more than Carter.

Banner day of bi-partisanship on the politics board!

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by baltassoc
At least we've reached some consensus that W sucks more than Carter.

Banner day of bi-partisanship on the politics board!

I think that is only if you accept my assumption. Either way I thought my Dole comment was somewhat bi-partisan, no?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think that is only if you accept my assumption. Either way I thought my Dole comment was somewhat bi-partisan, no?

We have to institute soemsort of poll quiz before we can let these guys vote if we really want to have results that are meaningful- here let's start with this question:

In your earlier answer, did the fact that Carter won a peace prize raise your estimate of him as President?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
We have to institute soemsort of poll quiz before we can let these guys vote if we really want to have results that are meaningful- here let's start with this question:

In your earlier answer, did the fact that Carter won a peace prize raise your estimate of him as President?

Viewing his honorarium with 20/20 hindsight, yes.

He is as beneficial to the United States and its mission in the world as his fellow humanitarian and Nobel Peace Prize winner (thanks to the liberal inteligentsia) Yassir Arafat.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
We have to institute soemsort of poll quiz before we can let these guys vote if we really want to have results that are meaningful- here let's start with this question:

In your earlier answer, did the fact that Carter won a peace prize raise your estimate of him as President?

Carter is a much better ex-President than he was President.

Bob Dole would have made a solid, but not spectacular President. With respect to achievements of the second Clinton Administration, I don't think that he would have pushed through the Good Friday accord, but he may have intervened in Bosnia and Kosovo. I would have picked him over either of the choices we had in 2000.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Not Bob
Carter is a much better ex-President than he was President.

I feel the same way about Carter's fellow Nobel Peace Prize winner, the now ex-President of the Palestine, Arafat. Satan is giving him rave reviews for his performance down unda'.

[Diane_Keaton]

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton

PoTD!

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
PoTD!

I'm sure Bob Novak would feel the same way.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'm sure Bob Novak would feel the same way.

This is bullshit. I'm walking.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

"If you really do care about getting good government for Iraq, you wait to invade until you have 300,000 Arabic-speaking military police in your coalition."

-- Brad DeLong

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Viewing his honorarium with 20/20 hindsight, yes.

He is as beneficial to the United States and its mission in the world as his fellow humanitarian and Nobel Peace Prize winner (thanks to the liberal inteligentsia) Yassir Arafat.

At the risk of confusing things by talking about reality, you might note that the peace accords between Israel and Egypt have been somewhat more successful than the dealings between Israel and the PLO.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
"If you really do care about getting good government for Iraq, you wait to invade until you have 300,000 Arabic-speaking military police in your coalition."

-- Brad DeLong

This makes no sense to me. I don't know this Brad DeLOng, but he sounds like an idiot. Is he from the DU?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
At the risk of confusing things by talking about reality, you might note that the peace accords between Israel and Egypt have been somewhat more successful than the dealings between Israel and the PLO.

If we are dealing in the world of practical reality (in re: the bond between the two nations that has evolved over the last 25 plus years) and by successful you mean that Egypt has diplomatic cover to avoid sacrificing thousands of men to additional doomed to fail pan-Arab attacks on Israel and additionally that Egypt has diplomatic cover to avoid having to lose large swathes of Egyptian territory in the same said doomed to fail attacks, then yes, I agree with whatever point you were making.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
At the risk of confusing things by talking about reality, you might note that the peace accords between Israel and Egypt have been somewhat more successful than the dealings between Israel and the PLO.

to which country? More Egyptians have had a hand in blowing up the WTC than Palis.