Waiting for Fitzgerald

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I already took responsibility for all that stuff. Why do you keep harping about it? Move on.

I think that photo was new, no? Post-Ty responsibility day.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I don't see how that would work. In most places, you're going to be in front of a judge who works with the police day in and day out. Juries are inclined to believe, or at least give the benefit of the doubt to, the police or anyone else acting under the color of authority.

Doesn't the same apply to the rulings on the exclusionary rule? I certainly share your healthy doubt of authority, but judges hardly seem reluctant to bend over backwards to find ways to let evidence in under the current system. They might be more inclined to send a message to the police if they weren't letting murderers off.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Penske_Account

The difference is Helms was not in the Klan. I challenge you to find a quote as egregious as this:

He would never fight "with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

Wow. To put it into some perspective, he was Coltrane's age now when he uttered that.

Originally posted by baltassoc
"Look at the above piece of sub-human filth, I wonder if the average kool-aid intoxicated Dean disciple of the left came upon a situation where they found both President George W. Bush and the ululating Palestinian whore above trapped in the e coli stew of New Orleans. Only one can be saved and the other would die. Which one would the leftie save?

I am betting the terror loving bee-yotch."

Wow. To put it into some perspective, he [Penske] was Penske's age now when he uttered that.

This is the stupidest post ever. I post a quote from your senator and conscience, the right racist Klan Kleagle and Grand Cyclops Bobby Byrd, spouting racist shite when he was past the age where youthful ignorance or immaturity can excuse. You compare and create an implicit equivalency between that and a post where I criticise the left for supporting people of such little human character as to applaud the mass murder by terror of 3000 Americans. I suppose this is to be expected as part of the left's continued attempt to excuse and/or rationalise the behaviour of the terrorists.

Anyway, congrats, I thought your "people who give to charity but not the charity of my choice are chumps" post was the stupidest post ever, but you beat your own record. I hope you are not using the juice to reach these new depths.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Plus, Bush's fine leadership has also inspired Blanco to accept responsibility for screw-ups at the State level. She is far more likely to actually be held accountable.

S_A_M

You guys already presented the case that Bush is a moronic screw up, the jury of the electorate rejected it, by an overwhelming mandate. Now Blanko will face the same fire, and, I pray, that the righteous people of louisiania will make as good a decision relative to Blanko as the people of the US did related to Bush.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You guys already presented the case that Bush is a moronic screw up, the jury of the electorate rejected it, by an overwhelming mandate. Now Blanko will face the same fire, and, I pray, that the righteous people of louisiania will make as good a decision relative to Blanko as the people of the US did related to Bush.

You want Blanco reelected?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
This is the stupidest post ever. I post a quote from your senator and conscience, the right racist Klan Kleagle and Grand Cyclops Bobby Byrd, spouting racist shite when he was past the age where youthful ignorance or immaturity can excuse. You compare and create an implicit equivalency between that and a post where I criticise the left for supporting people of such little human character as to applaud the mass murder by terror of 3000 Americans. I suppose this is to be expected as part of the left's continued attempt to excuse and/or rationalise the behaviour of the terrorists.

Anyway, congrats, I thought your "people who give to charity but not the charity of my choice are chumps" post was the stupidest post ever, but you beat your own record. I hope you are not using the juice to reach these new depths.

If you want friends------ you need to be friendly!

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Gattigap
You want Blanco reelected?

No. I pray for the people to make the righteous decision. With Bush that was reelection (we won! Yes!), with Blanko it is rejection; however, I am not praying that hard, I have never been to Louisiana and may never go there (other than maybe a quick dip over the state line to pee on Cajun territory and add it to the "States I have been to list"), so what do I care? Let them reap whatever it is they want to sow.......let them eat cake, kingcake. Blanko will face her own special judgment when she comes face to face with the fallen angel Satan some day.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
If you want friends------ you need to be friendly!

I have enough friends, at this point I am looking for lovers or enemies. Choose your poison!

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
so what do I care?

Based on posting history, perhaps more than you're willing to admit.

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by Gattigap
You want Blanco reelected?

She will be, after the people read this.

The real question is, if an election was held today, who would win - Bush or Blanco?

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
This is the stupidest post ever. I post a quote from your senator and conscience, the right racist Klan Kleagle and Grand Cyclops Bobby Byrd, spouting racist shite when he was past the age where youthful ignorance or immaturity can excuse. You compare and create an implicit equivalency between that and a post where I criticise the left for supporting people of such little human character as to applaud the mass murder by terror of 3000 Americans. I suppose this is to be expected as part of the left's continued attempt to excuse and/or rationalise the behaviour of the terrorists.

Anyway, congrats, I thought your "people who give to charity but not the charity of my choice are chumps" post was the stupidest post ever, but you beat your own record. I hope you are not using the juice to reach these new depths.

I am comparing the statement made 50 years ago (and nonetheless not acceptable) by someone neither of us know to your completely unacceptable blatently racist comment from two days ago.

You have no idea who that woman is or what she believes. She is to you a "piece of sub-human filth", a "ululating ... whore" and a "terror loving bee-yotch" because she is Palistinian, and for no other reason.

Fuck you, you racist piece of shit. You are not worthy of my contempt.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
She will be, after the people read this.

The real question is, if an election was held today, who would win - Bush or Blanco?

Go back a year and read all you guys gloating about Farenheit 9/11 and how the election was over. You were right.

What is the source (The American Law Institute), is it unbiased, and can a Congressman approach a researcher of his own choice.

Conyers is a nice man, personally, but he's to the left of Ty politically. I find very little convincing from him.

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by baltassoc
I am comparing the statement made 50 years ago (and nonetheless not acceptable) by someone neither of us know to your completely unacceptable blatently racist comment from two days ago.

You have no idea who that woman is or what she believes. She is to you a "piece of sub-human filth", a "ululating ... whore" and a "terror loving bee-yotch" because she is Palistinian, and for no other reason.

Fuck you, you racist piece of shit. You are not worthy of my contempt.

In fairness to Penske (now, that feels odd) the picture in question is a pretty well-known photo of certain Palestinians celebrating the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. Note that the fellow next to her in the picture is offering some type of bread/dip -- which I've read is a traditional food for celebrations.

Thus, while his statements were offensive and over-the-top, he did not call her those names merely because she is a Palestinian.

I don't like what I see in the picture, but am unwilling to classify as "sub-human filth" or "whores" all those who celebrate the deaths of people they do not know but perceive as enemies (even innocents). Too many Americans fall into that mode sometimes, but certainly Nut Penske.

S_A_M

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by baltassoc
I am comparing the statement made 50 years ago (and nonetheless not acceptable) by someone neither of us know to your completely unacceptable blatently racist comment from two days ago.

You have no idea who that woman is or what she believes. She is to you a "piece of sub-human filth", a "ululating ... whore" and a "terror loving bee-yotch" because she is Palistinian, and for no other reason.

Fuck you, you racist piece of shit. You are not worthy of my contempt.

Penske shouldn't be bothered that a group of people celebrated 9/11 as a victory- he should leave it up to the Prosecutors to issue supeonas for those guilty of the attack and wait for the Courts?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think that photo was new, no? Post-Ty responsibility day.

I took responsibility for what the lefties did, not for all the photographs you have foisted on this board. I'm a reasonable person, but I have my limits.