Still Hating America.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That he did nothing to tinker with that growth is another feather in his cap. Bill Clinton was a wonderful president because he did Nothing.

Its doing Something that's made the mess we're in now.

2. It was better when Al queda was simply funding and training people to attack us here. During Clinton. while he did nothing, all AQ did was prepare to strike us here- I mean if you ignore the attacks on our embassies and bases and ships overseas.

[Adder]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
... that not only is the leadership of the Democratic party - despite repeated and vehement denials by Sidd, Ty, Gatti et. al. - completely and utterly beholden to the moonbat lefty KOS, ANSWER, Michael Moore crowd - but that they are nothing more than a bunch of amoral pussies:



Slowly starving our own fucking troops in a war zone - that is what this pig Murtha is now proposing.

1. Isn't this essentially saying that they lack of political muscle to force an immediate withdrawl, and thus are thus adopting a tactic that they think is more likely to be effect?

2. Why do you post these things withought attribution? From the parantheticals, I can only assume that you are posting something from the moonbat right, likely a direct analog to the very sites that you like to malign.

[Adder]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That he did nothing to tinker with that growth is another feather in his cap. Bill Clinton was a wonderful president because he did Nothing.

Its doing Something that's made the mess we're in now.

I am not sure many people would agree with you about Clinton doing nothing.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Adder
I am not sure many people would agree with you about Clinton doing nothing.

i disagree with you

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
... that not only is the leadership of the Democratic party - despite repeated and vehement denials by Sidd, Ty, Gatti et. al. - completely and utterly beholden to the moonbat lefty KOS, ANSWER, Michael Moore crowd - but that they are nothing more than a bunch of amoral pussies:



Slowly starving our own fucking troops in a war zone - that is what this pig Murtha is now proposing.

(a) Where'd you get this piece, Slave? I'd suggest caution because it is factually inaccurate. (For example, Murtha was not convicted of any crime related to the ABSCAM investigation. In fact, I don't think he was charged. He didn't take the money.)

(b) Oh, yeah, that "pig" will absolutely "starve" our troops. They won't have even a bullet to shoot at the ravening hordes of Islamofascists surrounding them.

So, the Congressional Dems really can't win with you, can they? They are amoral pussies if they do nothing and amoral pussies if they may do something you disagree with. Gotcha.

S_A_M

[Secret_Agent_Man]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2. It was better when Al queda was simply funding and training people to attack us here. During Clinton. while he did nothing, all AQ did was prepare to strike us here- I mean if you ignore the attacks on our embassies and bases and ships overseas.

Yerp -- and your boys were busy working to impeach him for splooging on an intern instead of demanding that he do more to defend our great nation -- or proposing alternative policies. Great use of time and resources there.

S_A_M

[Adder]

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Yerp -- and your boys were busy working to impeach him for splooging on an intern instead of demanding that he do more to defend our great nation -- or proposing alternative policies. Great use of time and resources there.

S_A_M

But SAM, he got a blow job! Oral sex! How will our young people know that cock-to-mouth is always unacceptable if our leaders are having non-procreative sex?? And she was fat!!

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Adder
But SAM, he got a blow job! Oral sex! How will our young people know that cock-to-mouth is always unacceptable if our leaders are having non-procreative sex?? And she was fat!!

someday you might get to be a lawyer, right? you understand about how you have to tell the truth under oath?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Spanky
Last week C-SPAN featured a discussion about Rudolph Giuliani that left me shaking my head. The gist of the guest's message was that Giuliani was a "Rockefeller Republican" who was suddenly transformed into a darling of conservatives after 9/11. Today, Fox News echoed the same theme.

That's quite wrong.

It is. The Social Conservative wing of the GOP is an embarrassment. They're better titled "The William Jennings Bryan Party."

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
someday you might get to be a lawyer, right? you understand about how you have to tell the truth under oath?

Really... Can you expound?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Adder
I am not sure many people would agree with you about Clinton doing nothing.

I knew Hank'd wander into that open barn door.

Clearly, I was speaking more to Clinton's economic policies. Context is to Hank as gravity is to Superman.

[Adder]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
someday you might get to be a lawyer, right? you understand about how you have to tell the truth under oath?

You're a lawyer and you still believe in truth? Shit, man, my whole job is to make truth as ambiguous as possible. Except when my job is to figure out what truth is. I hate it when that happens.

[Adder]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
It is. The Social Conservative wing of the GOP is an embarrassment. They're better titled "The William Jennings Bryan Party."

They are pro-silver? Who knew?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2. It was better when Al queda was simply funding and training people to attack us here. During Clinton. while he did nothing, all AQ did was prepare to strike us here- I mean if you ignore the attacks on our embassies and bases and ships overseas.

Hank,

I forever concede (not that I ever argued the contrary) that Clitnon's policies toward AQ are unforgiveable. When I say I like him becazuse he did nothing, I'm speaking about his running the country as a good moderate Republican (many of whom would likely have followed a similar policy toward AQ).

You're right,
SD

[Adder]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Hank,

I forever concede (not that I ever argued the contrary) that Clitnon's policies toward AQ are unforgiveable. When I say I like him becazuse he did nothing, I'm speaking about his running the country as a good moderate Republican (many of whom would likely have followed a similar policy toward AQ).

You're right,
SD

Given that Clinton was 100% more hawkish toward AQ than EVERYONE else, this is really more than a little unfair.

And, as I said, I disagree that he did nothing economically. Although most of what he did was cheerleading.