Nutjobs Ranting About Politics. - Page 66

Paddle Mybuttocks · 08-02-2004, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
That is fine if she likes the way it looks, but it isn't believable that someone at 65 would have a neck that tight.

Speaking of tight, how's the hoo ha hanging?

sgtclub · 08-02-2004, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Now in all fairness, have you taken a look at John Kerry? It ain't pretty. I would say even Nixon was better looking.

I think Teresa's sexy for a 65 year old.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 08-02-2004, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
How come the Dems keep nominating guys with wives that no one in their right minds would want to fuck? It has got to led to adultry.

So, Hank, are you one for the "come hither" look:

Or are you looking for the Mrs. Howell look?

sgtclub · 08-02-2004, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap

No, I'm not saying that. I am saying, though, that Club maintained that one cannot forward a moral argument for progressive taxation, at least not one that's disingenuous.

I disagreed. Rawls provides a mechanism that can establish the morality of progressive taxation.

Gattigap

I'm not familiar with that theory. Can you give me the cliff note version?

Not Me · 08-02-2004, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I think Teresa's sexy for a 65 year old.

The reason she is sexy for a 65 year old is because most 65 year olds haven't had that much plastic surgery. NTTAWWT.

08-02-2004, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I think Teresa's sexy for a 65 year old.

GROSS.

Speaking of whihc, how many licks do you think it takes to get to the center of a tootsie pop?

sgtclub · 08-02-2004, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
The reason she is sexy for a 65 year old is because most 65 year olds haven't had that much plastic surgery. NTTAWWT.

So you to may have something in common? I don't care how people get their looks, as long as they get them.

In other news, I am happy to report that on my flights the last couple of days, I did not get stuck next to one fatty, though there were plenty of them on the plane. By the law of averages, I'm screwed for my next few flights.

Gattigap · 08-02-2004, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not familiar with that theory. Can you give me the cliff note version?

Well, I don't have the time to write a cliff-notes summary at the moment, but Google reveals some cliff notes-sized summaries here or here.

Not Me · 08-02-2004, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
So you to may have something in common? I don't care how people get their looks, as long as they get them.

I don't care either, that is why I said NTTAWWT, but am just commenting on what I like and what I don't like about the work she has had done.

I just snicker, though, at how many men and also women cannot figure out who has and who has not had plastic surgery. Sure if the work done is bad, then everyone can tell. But when the work done is good work, most people cannot tell unless it is unreasonable to believe that someone of a certain age would look like that. Or like with Christy Brinkley when you see pictures of her from 10 years ago and she looks younger now than she did 10 years ago.

Not Me · 08-02-2004, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
So, Hank, are you one for the "come hither" look:

That isn't a come hither look. It is an over done brow lift look. It will relax but until it does, you get that surprised look. Nancy Pelosi had that look in her rebuttal to the State of the Union address.

Atticus Grinch · 08-02-2004, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You think you can identify a wobbler from a still photograph?

I explained my methodology, while admitting it's an inexact science. He seems to be looking to the right of the photographer, and his follow-through looks like it was aimed there, so I think the trajectory of the ovoid is different from its rotational axis.

If that strikes you as touchy-feely, so be it. Michelangelo was correct about the position of Laocoön's arm in the Agesander, Athenedoros and Polydorus marble of the Laocoön Group, but he had to wait until 1957 to be vindicated over Raphael. The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient.

Not Me · 08-02-2004, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paddle Mybuttocks
Speaking of tight, how's the hoo ha hanging?

Hank, why are you so obsessed with my hoo ha?

Sexual Harassment Panda · 08-02-2004, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
If that strikes you as touchy-feely, so be it. Michelangelo was correct about the position of Laocoön's arm in the Agesander, Athenedoros and Polydorus marble of the Laocoön Group, but he had to wait until 1957 to be vindicated over Raphael. The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient.

True enough, but remember everyone agreed that Laocoön was too short to see over the interior linemen of the time, and thus had to be a rollout, scrambling passer. As such, he couldn't go downfield much, and so had less need for a tight spiral on his throws.

Say_hello_for_me · 08-02-2004, 08:49 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...ity/index.html

CNN reporting Kerry quote that Bush policies fuel terrorist recruitment. Somebody please take this braindead blowhard out back and put him out of his misery.

Fighting back fuels terrorist recruitment? Gee, lets go back to the days of not fighting back, and decreasing funding for our military while we were at it. Who supported those policies again?

While the quote is probably technically correct in that conflict tends to drive up recruitment on both sides, its the implied statement in there (you know, Senator Kerry has a stellar record on voting for things that keep us safe!), that is going to have Kerry see his first major asskicking by noon tomorrow.

And before you say it, how in the world are these two buffoons the only two people our parties can agree on?

Hello

sgtclub · 08-02-2004, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...ity/index.html

CNN reporting Kerry quote that Bush policies fuel terrorist recruitment. Somebody please take this braindead blowhard out back and put him out of his misery.

Fighting back fuels terrorist recruitment? Gee, lets go back to the days of not fighting back, and decreasing funding for our military while we were at it. Who supported those policies again?

While the quote is probably technically correct in that conflict tends to drive up recruitment on both sides, its the implied statement in there (you know, Senator Kerry has a stellar record on voting for things that keep us safe!), that is going to have Kerry see his first major asskicking by noon tomorrow.

And before you say it, how in the world are these two buffoons the only two people our parties can agree on?

Hello

I think Kerry's strategy has been effective thus far. Go to the right of Bush on defence, and when Bush responds, fall back on the VN/don't challenge my patriotism thing. Quotes like this may work against him, but they haven't to date.