A frolic in Cambodia - Page 77

SlaveNoMore · 11-08-2004, 07:20 PM

Quote:

ABBAKiss
I have been filmed and I thought it was pretty neato to watch.

Since I haven't seen it, you clearly need a better agent.

robustpuppy · 11-08-2004, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Are we going to have to define "ass"? B/c don't understand what you're asking.

There is definitely no need to define ass here.

I have completely lost my ability to concentrate. Fucking work.

What I meant to write was,

"Assuming you are gifted enough to so multitask, wouldn't the part of her body of which she might be critical appear smaller than it does in the usual context?"

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 11-08-2004, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I don't get it either. Thanks for asking the question. Whatever happened to tripods? Why do you need to use your hands?

What's not to get? You hold the, in this case, digital camera, and point it down and slightly forward. Guy leans back just a little. Works even better with reverse cowgirl on the couch. That way you can lean back more and get more in the picture than just penis going in vagina and top of ass.

sebastian_dangerfield · 11-08-2004, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
That's what I keep saying about the movies in HD. You can read the cock tats. Clarity is better (for the most part) it's not like you're seeing faces or whatever. It's just the unfortunate stretch marks that these people have where a little blurriness would come in handy.

But wouldn't you want "some" body parts to look bigger?

Cock tats? Shit, its been a while since I've watched porn.

As far as the blurry thing goes, grooming may as well be forgotten. From any distance past 8 feet she loooked like she had a disco mitt. And your nose will look much bigger. Everything immediately noticeable is exagerrated.

High res is the way to go...

greatwhitenorthchick · 11-08-2004, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
There are some things I leave to professionals.

This reminds me. I saw Wanda Sykes the other night and she was very good. The guy opening for was also good and I wish I could remember his name.

She did a bit on her new show and how she went to the chicken ranch and learned how to be a ho. That's what reminded me of the professionals bit.

Also, she did a very funny bit about how your right tit is always nicer than your left. Which is certainly true for me. Very funny (I suppose funnier if you are a chick).

Anyhoo, if she comes to your town, she is worth checking out.

sebastian_dangerfield · 11-08-2004, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
That way you can lean back more and get more in the picture than just penis going in vagina and top of ass.

Yeh, you get a blazing red eye bonanza. Why again would a chick dig this angle? So she could save money on proctology exams?

Replaced_Texan · 11-08-2004, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Also, she did a very funny bit about how your right tit is always nicer than your left. Which is certainly true for me. Very funny (I suppose funnier if you are a chick).

Holy shit, me too! It ALWAYS gets first attention, and it is the smaller one. Hmmmmm....

greatwhitenorthchick · 11-08-2004, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
What's not to get? You hold the, in this case, digital camera, and point it down and slightly forward. Guy leans back just a little. Works even better with reverse cowgirl on the couch. That way you can lean back more and get more in the picture than just penis going in vagina and top of ass.

I just don't get why you would want to have a camera in your hands. That was my stumbling block. If I were going to be filmed, I would want my whole bod in the picture. Vanity, I suppose.

Replaced_Texan · 11-08-2004, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I just don't get why you would want to have a camera in your hands. That was my stumbling block. If I were going to be filmed, I would want my whole bod in the picture. Vanity, I suppose.

Control?

greatwhitenorthchick · 11-08-2004, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Holy shit, me too! It ALWAYS gets first attention, and it is the smaller one. Hmmmmm....

It is smaller, but perkier and cuter. I'm quite taken with my right tit.

11-08-2004, 07:30 PM

Yay!

__________________
Pushy the Puppy

Replaced_Texan · 11-08-2004, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
It is smaller, but perkier and cuter. I'm quite taken with my right tit.

Me too. If I were to be tweaking a nipple, it'd be the right nipple.

robustpuppy · 11-08-2004, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Me too. If I were to be tweaking a nipple, it'd be the right nipple.

Y'all are confusing the hell out of me. Do you mean MY right, or YOUR right? Or Gwinky's right?

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 11-08-2004, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
There is definitely no need to define ass here.

I have completely lost my ability to concentrate. Fucking work.

What I meant to write was,

"Assuming you are gifted enough to so multitask, wouldn't the part of her body of which she might be critical appear smaller than it does in the usual context?"

From a photography site: "When we see objects with our own eyes the perspective could be represented by the relative size of those objects, especially when two or more objects of the similar size, but on various distance from us, look differently - objects closer to us seem to be bigger, while farthest objects are very small and sometimes vanish in a dot."

B/c the ass is closer than most of the rest of the body, it would appear disproportionately larger than the rest of the body. The ass would be 2 or 3 feet away, while other body parts, e.g., head, arms, etc, would be twice that far, creating the illusion that the ass is much bigger than it really is.

Of course, the guy can compensate for this illusion by having a larger than average dick, which would, relatively speaking, give the illusion of a smaller ass.

So I guess the conclusion is, ladies, that if you choose to be filmed in this perspective, the bigger the dick is, the smaller your ass looks.

NotFromHere · 11-08-2004, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Cock tats? Shit, its been a while since I've watched porn.

High res is the way to go...

What the hell are you waiting for, man? YOu may find yourself in a situation where you won't even be able to rent one in your hotel room, remember? Get on it while you can. Remember, when porn movies are outlawed, only outlaws will have porn movies.

And the tats are usually in "goth" type, and very hard to read without the HD. I'm just saying.