New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
That's theoretical fucking and does not count. A better test would be if we all listed everyone we've ever fucked and figured out what proportion were stupid.

Of course, that would require both remembering everyone we've ever fucked AND having some clue as to their intelligence.

And, in order to make a list, you would have to remember everyone's name - because sometimes a name was never mentioned.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall



TM

What does a picture of Hillary and yo mamma have to do with me?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I thought leagl was thinking about this as theoretical fucking. She wanted to know "would we" rather than "have we."

I see your point. I was thinking that willingness would be demonstrated by past practice, and that she was talking about an extent rather than an "ever" situation. I am pretty sure I have fucked one or two objectively stupid people, but not positive because we didn't talk much.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by NotFromHere

Why do you have Mrs. Wonk's car as your new avatar?

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Hm. I'm not liking it so much. Not sure why.

The only reason I can think of is that "Sebby and ltl are both so fucking lame" has only 11 or 12 syllables (depending on whether one says "el tee el" or "little" to oneself when singing along) where the same line in the orignal song has 13. Your rhythm got a little off, that's all.

I liked it. It had a good beat and I could dance to it.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
The only reason I can think of is that "Sebby and ltl are both so fucking lame" has only 11 or 12 syllables (depending on whether one says "el tee el" or "little" to oneself when singing along) where the same line in the orignal song has 13. Your rhythm got a little off, that's all.

I liked it. It had a good beat and I could dance to it.

Ah. So it could be fixed by changing it to "ltl/fb" and pronouncing it "little eff bee."

[leagleaze]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I thought leagl was thinking about this as theoretical fucking. She wanted to know "would we" rather than "have we."

Yes, it was a would we. Or could we. Or maybe should we.

People are very welcome to answer did they if they want. Really any talk about sex is fine.

[lookingformarket]

Originally posted by leagleaze
Would you fuck a stupid person?

I am betting that more men would fuck a stupid woman, then women would fuck a stupid man, cause I am sexist that way.

Isn't that true simply as a matter of probability theory?

[Aloha Mr. Learned Hand]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Does masturbation count?

I dunno. But if they say they want to fuck you and that's all they do, they're really fucking stupid...

If you're talking about yourself, can't help you there...

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by taxwonk
Why do you have Mrs. Wonk's car as your new avatar?

WHAT? That bitch stole my car? I'll kick her ass!

Eh, I was just reading an article on how manufacturers were leaning toward building a car you either love or hate rather than sticking to the so very boring (read Honda, Toyota). And this pic was there. And I think it's the cutest thing ever. And if they ever put a real engine and sport seats in it, it will be worth buying.

article here - Why we’ll see more ugly cars

But it's a temporary thing - Shaun will be back soon because he's my boy.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by leagleaze
Would you fuck a stupid person?

I am betting that more men would fuck a stupid woman, then women would fuck a stupid man, cause I am sexist that way.


I would not fuck a stupid person. I would find her too irritating to fuck.

I wouldn't fuck anyone I couldn't bear to converse with before and after. Unfortunately, this means that both Jessica Simpson and Britney Spears are useless to me.

It also means that Gwinky has an intriguing mouth.

Tax(live! from NYC)wonk

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by lookingformarket
Isn't that true simply as a matter of probability theory?

Again, I think you're confusing the "would" and the "have." Probability theory speaks to the "have", and, yes, I suspect you are right. It does not speak to the would.

And now Leagl's introduced the notion of "could." I really don't know what to make of that.

[The Crystal City Kid]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
The only reason I can think of is that "Sebby and ltl are both so fucking lame" has only 11 or 12 syllables (depending on whether one says "el tee el" or "little" to oneself when singing along) where the same line in the orignal song has 13. Your rhythm got a little off, that's all.

I liked it. It had a good beat and I could dance to it.

I thought you were ignoring me. Phew. You must have been out of town. I have not seen your car in the parking garage lately. That was time consuming, looking for your car. I hope you had a nice vacation. In the event you are too busy to read all your emails, here is the most recent one I sent to you. Please reply.

Saw your picture and read your profile and have one question - where have you been hiding because you are spectacular. If your personality matches the way the look, you must be a very special lady. I know that you must get hundreds of responses, but if you like what you see and read, please reply.

Please reply, Robust.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
I was just reading an article on how manufacturers were leaning toward building a car you either love or hate rather than sticking to the so very boring (read Honda, Toyota).

Which is a good thing, since, besides ginormous SUVs, the homogeneity of cars -- as well as malls, houses, restaurants, music, and cocktails -- is the worst thing going

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Your rhythm got a little off, that's all.

fringee's rhythm off? You're brutal.

That's worse than anything Sebby's said.