» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 753 |
0 members and 753 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
08-12-2005, 07:17 PM
|
#1336
|
For what it's worth
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Did you consider what happens in new york city? Or any place less reliant on cars than California?
|
Yes - more people would have their premiums paid for by the government. Is that a problem?
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:25 PM
|
#1337
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,050
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
My goal is to have as little government as possible but still get everyone covered. The more government the more things get screwed up. I can't think of way to have less government involvement and still get everyone covered than my plan. If someone else does I would love to hear.
|
I'm thinking there would be a basic package of care that everyone would get, the particulars of which would be the same. People would then buy care above and beyond that with their own money, etc. So the companies competing to provide the basic level of care would all be providing the same thing, and would have to compete on price in bidding for that business. The government's role would be to define the level of the care in the basic package, to put the care out to bid, and to ensure that consumers get what was paid for.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:29 PM
|
#1338
|
Don't touch there
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm thinking there would be a basic package of care that everyone would get, the particulars of which would be the same. People would then buy care above and beyond that with their own money, etc. So the companies competing to provide the basic level of care would all be providing the same thing, and would have to compete on price in bidding for that business. The government's role would be to define the level of the care in the basic package, to put the care out to bid, and to ensure that consumers get what was paid for.
|
The discussion of a two-tier health system has been going on in Canada for some time now.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:31 PM
|
#1339
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Quote:
Sexual Harassment Panda
The discussion of a two-tier health system has been going on in Canada for some time now.
|
So has secession. That isn't necessarily a good idea either.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:37 PM
|
#1340
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
|
I blame Lindros
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
So has secession. That isn't necessarily a good idea either.
|
That died when the Nordiques moved to Denver.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:41 PM
|
#1341
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Meech Lake, Part Deux
Quote:
Not Bob
That died when the Nordiques moved to Denver.
|
Haven't you heard - now the Flames, Canucks and the rest of Western Canada want out.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:42 PM
|
#1342
|
Don't touch there
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
So has secession. That isn't necessarily a good idea either.
|
The health system discussion is still going on there. You should try to keep current.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:42 PM
|
#1343
|
Don't touch there
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
|
Meech Lake, Part Deux
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Haven't you heard - now the Flames, Canucks and the rest of Western Canada want out.
|
Their hopes are rekindled now that Toronto has signed Lindros.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 07:55 PM
|
#1344
|
Consigliere
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pelosi Land!
Posts: 9,477
|
Quote:
Sexual Harassment Panda
The health system discussion is still going on there. You should try to keep current.
|
Uh, so is secession, schmoe.
From three days ago.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:00 PM
|
#1345
|
For what it's worth
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
|
Troll?
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
On the off-chance that you are serious, a troll is:
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument. http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...term=troll&r=f
The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. http://www.urban75.com/Mag/troll.html
|
I was serious and thanks.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:10 PM
|
#1346
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
|
Troll?
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I was serious and thanks.
|
You are welcome.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:18 PM
|
#1347
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes - more people would have their premiums paid for by the government. Is that a problem?
|
Yes. Why tie it to drivers' licenses? Why not issue licenses to breath--call them green cards--and make buying health insurance a condition of acquiring them?
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:22 PM
|
#1348
|
Guest
|
Troll?
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I was serious and thanks.
|
A troll is also a short, fat, ugly 27 year old virgin man. Trolls tend to weds beautiful ladies.
ETA! Trifecta! Mon Dieu!!!
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:27 PM
|
#1349
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
|
Troll?
Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
A troll is also a short, fat, ugly 27 year old virgin man. Trolls tend to weds beautiful ladies.
ETA! Trifecta! Mon Dieu!!!
|
I think you mean "beautiful Woman."
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 08:41 PM
|
#1350
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
|
You watch her eyes
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I think you mean "beautiful Woman."
|
Apropos of Nothing, I now have Doctor Hook's "When You're In Love With a Beautiful Woman" playing on my mental soundtrack.
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|