Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 - Page 911

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) · 07-15-2003, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MisterEbola
I said circumcised. I think they remove the fangs at least during the process.

I suppose, but it's a bit hard to make out in the picture. And it's not like I study the differences in the gym shower.

Maybe paigow should stick her nipple in there and see what happens.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) · 07-15-2003, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aloha Mr. Learned Hand
Problem is, what's to stop some group from jumping in front of, say, Lance's group, for political reasons while some, say, French contender rides off into the sunset???

I'm sure they could handle it. Although it's not like the guy who was knocked over by the photographer while leading up L'Alpe D'Huez a couple of years ago was cut any breaks. That's cycling.

bilmore · 07-15-2003, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DFH's_Shit_Shoveler
Enough, Bilmore. Your backpedaling has you in Nevada already. Get me some blow.

I had been hoping this was all over, but, no, so, I have to say that your "backpedaling" comment is intentionally wrong and cheap.

idle acts · 07-15-2003, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MisterEbola
[url]Story which incorporates Brazilian waxing, merkins, pubic topiary and celebrity references

ME is working overtime to rehabilitate himself!

barely_legal · 07-15-2003, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
So has anyone else seen this yet?

I thought it was pretty good. Not great, but good. I found it quite different from the others though, and I didn't find the new terminator all that menacing.

SPOILERS

[absolutely nothing substantive about the movie]

I'm glad you put that spoiler in there. Otherwise that would have ruined the movie for me. Really.

I like stuff at the end of spoiler space to be REALLY spoil-y so that it makes me rethink spending money and/or time to watch something. Help out a sista, leagl. Post some real spoilers.

ThrashersFan · 07-15-2003, 06:39 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,91987,00.html

spree: national organ-donor pool whose members will get first crack at each other's organs before they are made available to the general public.

I signed up and named the members of the FB as my designated organ recipients.

Who wants my TITS???

greatwhitenorthchick · 07-15-2003, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
So has anyone else seen this yet?

I saw it. I thought it was ok. I really liked T2 though and it wasn't nearly as good as that, so that was disappointing. It was so jam-packed with action that it was kind of banal. Not enough punctuation.

leagleaze · 07-15-2003, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
I'm glad you put that spoiler in there. Otherwise that would have ruined the movie for me. Really.

I like stuff at the end of spoiler space to be REALLY spoil-y so that it makes me rethink spending money and/or time to watch something. Help out a sista, leagl. Post some real spoilers.

Oh fuck you

I was being cautious, what's wrong with that? Sheesh.

What do you want to know? Oh I know

REAL SPOILERS

REAL SPOILERS

REAL SPOILERS

Apparently fate is not what you make it, and the issue wasn't really up for debate.

GWNC I think I felt similarly. It really just seemed to go and go for the most part, not much of a plot.

bilmore · 07-15-2003, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
spree: national organ-donor pool whose members will get first crack at each other's organs before they are made available to the general public.

This would be cool. The next step would be selling off the post-death rights to your organs - sort of a reverse mortgage concept.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 07-15-2003, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I probably wouldn't have commented on the stuff at all, until the jumping-on seemed sort of unfair. I probably go too far in trying to see someone else's viewpoint, whereas you probably don't go far enough. Somewhere in the middle is the smart person who just stays completely out of this whole conversation. That person must be found and killed lest all internet conversation ceases.

OK, I'm actually billing some time today and come to the board to catch up and I discover talk of religion and politics on the fashion board and confessions of hot, lascivious lust on the Mom's and Dad's board. What gives?

Moreover, as I read through the FB posts I discover that both Bilmore and Thurgreed (even when disagreeing with each other) seem to make a lot of sense. I have always thought that Bilmore had a way of making even the most idiotic position sound rational and that Thurgreed's unique talent was to make even the most rational position sound like blatant idiocy, so finding myself thinking they each had something sensible to say and said it reasonably is very disconcerting.

Then I discover that the fact that I missed all this excitement has led to a death threat from Bilmore, who is now starting to sound like Thurgreed.

I say we start a religion board where we can insult each other's religions with the same vigor we insult each other's politics and taste. This could bring out entirely new facets of everyone's "personality". What do you think?

(Edited to say, I'm adding Kim Possible to my laminated list.)

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) · 07-15-2003, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
This would be cool. The next step would be selling off the post-death rights to your organs - sort of a reverse mortgage concept.

And the step after that the pre-death rights?

Oh, wait.

ltl/fb · 07-15-2003, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
This would be cool. The next step would be selling off the post-death rights to your organs - sort of a reverse mortgage concept.

Then we can sell babies!!! I'd have a baby if I would end up with (a) a shitload of money and (b) no baby to raise. I'm sure based on such things as test scores I could get a bundle for it, but my advanced age might cut against me.

I wouldn't want to have one on spec, though.

notcasesensitive · 07-15-2003, 07:01 PM

Pat Robertson is praying for change on the Supreme Court (excerpt from cnn.com) --

Robertson has launched a 21-day "prayer offensive" directed at the Supreme Court in the wake of its 6-3 June vote that decriminalized sodomy. Robertson said in a letter on the CBN Web site that the ruling "has opened the door to homosexual marriage, bigamy, legalized prostitution and even incest."

The same letter targets three justices in particular: "One justice is 83-years-old, another has cancer and another has a heart condition. Would it not be possible for God to put it in the minds of these three judges that the time has come to retire?"

On the bright side, he didn't actually go so far as to tell his followers to go kill one of them. What an exercise of restraint.

n(praying that when the time comes Bush pulls another Souter out of the hat)cs

bilmore · 07-15-2003, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
. . . confessions of hot, lascivious lust on the Mom's and Dad's board. What gives?

Dunno, but the Mom's and Dad's Board traffic just skyrocketed.

ltl/fb · 07-15-2003, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I had been hoping this was all over, but, no, so, I have to say that your "backpedaling" comment is intentionally wrong and cheap.

Stop bickering, all of you. Am I going to have to pull this board over?

Now, for some truly offensive behavior, by someone in my own state, of course! Thanks to TexLex -- this is actually a cross-post.

Offensive Judge

......"You don't have any f-----g rights," he told Ronald Hickman, who was being held in jail on a charge of attempted burglary of a coin-operated machine......