Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
It's funny that you want to eliminate one of the objective factors showing dangerousness, in favor of a whole mess of subjective ones. Can you at least allow us to call the cops if we see a person with an unholstered sidearm?
BTW, there are some lawyers in San Francisco that owe their lives to a "man with a gun" call. If the 911 responders had been quicker, perhaps all of their colleagues would be alive today.
|
Its funny that your justification for objective factors which trump constitutional rights would just as easily allow calls for a "black man walking freely" or a "person in drag" call type. And sure for the "unholstered" sidearm, as somebody better damn well have a good reason to be handling a gun in public.
As for the San Francisco types, if liberals had allowed the deceased to carry guns, perhaps the deceased wouldn't be deceased. Ironic that.
As it is, the police are busy pretty much wherever there are Democrats, so ya can't really count on them too much, promises of Democratic politicians notwithstanding. And are ya sure it wasn't a Shots Fired or Person Shot call that they owe their lives too? It sounds like you might have some knowledge of whatever situation you are talking about.
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I wonder if Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris would have grown up to be Ds, or Rs?
|
Hard to say. Given their disposition towards lawlessness, what do you think the statistics would say?
Threaded Mode