The New And Improved Fashion Board

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I've only squirted once ever. I thought I was peeing then. But I wasn't!! God can be mysterious.

Squirting is a gift from the Gods?

[Flinty_McFlint]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
TM taking Spanky to task.

Man, that make-up sex is gonna be awesome!

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I've only squirted once ever. I thought I was peeing then. But I wasn't!! God can be mysterious.

You fucked GOD!?!????

I squirt semi-frequently, but ALWAYS when I am on coke or E (which is not that often). I have never fucked God, but I have danced with the Devil in the pale moonlight.

I just took an online quiz and learned that I drink more than 97% of adults and 99% of women. Huh. So perhaps I am bad news for rehab boy.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I've only squirted once ever. I thought I was peeing then. But I wasn't!! God can be mysterious.

Interesting. The first time this happened to me the man I was with thought it meant he was a god. Which he most definitely was not.

[patentparanyc]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
You fucked GOD!?!????

I squirt semi-frequently, but ALWAYS when I am on coke or E (which is not that often). I have never fucked God, but I have danced with the Devil in the pale moonlight.

I just took an online quiz and learned that I drink more than 97% of adults and 99% of women. Huh. So perhaps I am bad news for rehab boy.

do you post this shit from work?

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Spanky
Really? We can end this discussion right now if you agree with this statement:

Even though African Americans have experienced oppression and enslavement for four hundred years and experience institutional oppression right now, such prior history and current circumstances does not make it OK for them to make racist comments about any other races or ethnic groups in this country.

Do you have a problem with that statement?

If you don't, I don't know what we have been arguing about.



The four hundred years of racism came up after we were already into the discussion. Talk about tangents. Now all of a sudden you have chosen a tangent and are saying that was what our argument was about. I had no problem with the facts you stated, I just had a problem with the conclusion you drew from them. I did not argue with the truth of the facts asserted (that blacks have been oppressed for four hundred years etc.) the problem I have is that you use that history to say that African Americans can make racist comments. Otherwise, why did you even bring up the history?




When did I ever say this or imply this? Where do you get this stuff? Stop pretending I said stuff that I didn't.





Who threw a fit? You just carved out an exception of when it was OK to make racist remarks and I called you on it. The point of the discussion was what Michael Richards said and whether it would be OK if someone who was black did the same thing to a white crowd. I never said that the racism "occurred a long time ago". I never even implied that there has not been historical racism and that racism still continues today. You simply ascribed that argument to me and then criticized me for it. The only thing I have ever said is that there should be no exceptions when it comes to racism or racist comments. I have said it over and over again and yet you try and pretend the discussion is about something else.



When I have I ignored it? When have I denied that? All I said was that no one should be given a pass when it comes to racist comments. Why do you keep making up arguments where none exist?





When have I ever implied or said that such a thing would make me upset. I have never discussed how such talk would affect me. What I disagree with is you trying to carve out an exception for when it is OK for people to make racist comments. I will say it again: It is not OK to give African Americans a pass to make racist comments because it serves to defeat the effort to make racist comments unacceptable in other circumstances. I have never made this personal.

If you can agree with me that racist comments are never OK, without exception, and if Michael Richards was black and had made those comments to some Jewish, Italian or Irish people, it would have also been horrendous, then we have nothing to argue about.



No I have not. You haven't told me anything that I either did not know or haven’t heard before a thousand times. I have never argued with what you said. But you brought up those points to excuse black people making racist comments about whites. Have you not? Why else would you bring them up? Really. What other point where you trying to make when you brought up the historical racism? It is using those points to carve out an exception for racist activities that I have a problem with.




That is because that is what we were talking about. You said it was OK for certain people in certain circumstances to make such remarks and I disagreed with you. That is the only thing we are arguing about. Everything else is a tangent or a pretend argument you have created. I can't believe you are criticizing me for trying to stay focused on the issue at hand and then at the same time criticizing me for going off on tangents.



That is exactly what I am doing. Holding on like a starving dog is just another way of saying that I am trying to stick to the point. Stay focused on what we are arguing about. You tried to change the subject or pretend we were arguing about something else.



Although this is a tangent off the main argument, I will point out that what you are saying is flat out wrong. That is simply not true. Africans were taken as slaves to Brazil and Cuba under that understanding (in the first decade of the sixteenth century) a hundred years before any settlements were even made in North America. So the idea that black Africans and their offspring would be slaves in perpetuity was something the Spanish and Portuguese came up with. In addition, many ethnic groups have been placed in permanent servitude by other groups. What do you think the whole caste system is about in India? This goes as far back as the Israelis in Egypt.




I never said we don't look at own history to understand it. You know I didn't say that, so why do you make stuff up like that? I said that we need to look at our own history and the history of other countries. I am making a simple point you can't argue with. Racial prejudice is a universal problem throughout the world and many societies have tried to fix the problem (although many have not, just accepted it as OK - like Japan). It is in our benefit to see what remedies have been tried and what remedies have worked. How can you possibly argue with that?



When did I say "everything we need to know". I just said studying other cultures would be helpful in understanding our own problem. I never said that there is no need to study our own history, and that conclusion can not be logically drawn from anything I have said.



Not every culture, but many cultures. Is there something wrong with that?



When did I say "ignore" our history.



Do you really want to get into this when you criticized me for going off on tangents? Who is focusing on tangents now? We were arguing whether, (considering Whites hold all the power and Blacks don't) whether it is acceptable for blacks to make racist comments about whites, or whether it would be OK for a black person to make comments like Michael Richards made to a group of white people. .



How is that going to shed any light over when it is OK for Black people to make racist comments. You say I need to understand this in order for us to have this discussion. But even though I do understand it, I don't understand why it is relevant unless you are saying that this "institutional oppression" makes it OK for African Americans to make racist comments. Otherwise, why are you bringing it up.





We are discussing something very specific. Whether or not it is OK for African Americans to make racist comments. Now you are trying to pretend we are having some general discussion about race relations and telling me what I need to know about such a general discussion.

We can end this discussion right now if you agree with this statement:

Even though African Americans have experienced oppression and enslavement for four hundred years and experience institutional oppression right now, such prior history and current circumstances does not make it OK for them to make racist comments about other races in this country.

Do you have a problem with that statement?

I think there is something missing in your brain. Seriously. It's like there is a logic gap between what you should be taking in and what you spit out in your posts. And I really have no desire to have a long drawn out discussion about anything with someone with this problem. Especially since my responses to any and all of the comments you made above would be simple cut-and-pastes from both of our previous posts.

TM

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
do you post this shit from work?

What part of my post was shit? Why would I not post from work? Do you even know what my job is?

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
You fucked GOD!?!????

I squirt semi-frequently, but ALWAYS when I am on coke or E (which is not that often). I have never fucked God, but I have danced with the Devil in the pale moonlight.

I just took an online quiz and learned that I drink more than 97% of adults and 99% of women. Huh. So perhaps I am bad news for rehab boy.

My sister's ex-husband went to rehab ($25,000 worth of rehab) and emerged clean and sober and off the wagon. He's been off the wagon and a wonderful, responsible, nice person since then (almost a year) -- and he hasn't become a born-again or anything weird -- he's the same guy he was before, just no blackouts, mysterious disappearances, and neglect of his son. Too bad he did not sober up before he and my sister decided to split up, but what can you do.

Which is to say, I wouldn't let someone go just because they go to rehab.

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
do you post this shit from work?

Why not?
If anyone actually cared, there would be mandatory drug testing.
Hell, Barry Bonds could probably work in most firms.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Interesting. The first time this happened to me the man I was with thought it meant he was a god. Which he most definitely was not.

The person I've done it with most was eliminated from the roster because he so focused on making that particular thing happen and it detracted from the overall experience. And he kind of smelled like cumin* the last couple times I saw him, and I hate hate hate cumin.




*I think this is a component of curry.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by robustpuppy Irrelevant to this post.

Yay! I'm glad you resurrected this avatar. I like it.

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Why not?
If anyone actually cared, there would be mandatory drug testing.
Hell, Barry Bonds could probably work in most firms.

Oh - ppnyc was concerned about the drug references? I would much rather have my firm believe me to be a druggie than believe me to be stupid.

:hi:

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Squirting is a gift from the Gods?

Every squirt is sacred.

[Replaced_Texan]

Has anyone else become obsessed with the dead russian spy? It's like reading a crime novel in the daily papers. Or watching Alias. Who will end up dead next?

I dunno about the rest of you, but I'm avoiding sushi in London from here on out. Just in case.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I think there is something missing in your brain.

Yes, but what is the question? After all, he can't have everything in his brain, some things don't belong there. Maybe all he's missing in his brain is the stuff that shouldn't be there anyway. Did you ever think of that?

Seriously.

Why do people say this when they respond to Spanky, since he takes everything seriously? After all, it's been posted on an internet chat board. And, besides that, he's pretty certain he read it somewhere.

It's like there is a logic gap between what you should be taking in and what you spit out in your posts.

Don't you know that this is intentional? Maybe you should figure out who Spanky is and what he is doing here. Lot's of research has gone into this. Ooodles and ooodles. Really. He has 16 year old Serbian models researching everything right now. Check it out on the PB.

And I really have no desire to have a long drawn out discussion about anything with someone with this problem.

Who among us does? Yet, he will continue to respond regardless of what you or I do.

Especially since my responses to any and all of the comments you made above would be simple cut-and-pastes from both of our previous posts.

Especially since my responses to any and all of the comments you made above would be simple cut-and-pastes from both of our previous posts. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

TM

And I'm sure he disagrees with this as well.