» Site Navigation |
|
|
 |
|
01-23-2020, 12:02 PM
|
#151
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
|
Re: Debate Revisited.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
|
Ah, yes, "reasonable:"
Quote:
Regulating tourist visas for pregnant women is one way to get at the issue, but it raises questions about how officers would determine whether a woman is pregnant to begin with, and whether a woman could get turned away by border officers who suspect she may be just by looking at her.
|
Turning away women at random to solve a non-problem. Completely "reasonable."
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 12:19 PM
|
#152
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
|
Re: Debate Revisited.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Also, soy milk and oat milk aren't milk. And, we should acquire Greenland.
|
"There's no such thing as soy milk. It's soy juice. But they couldn't sell soy juice, so they called it soy milk. Because anytime you say soy juice, you actually... start to gag. And they put Soy Milk in with my Moo-Cow fuck milk, and it doesn't belong there, because we all know there's no such thing as Soy milk 'cause there's no soy titty, is there?" - Lewis Black
And Tristan da Cunha.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 12:57 PM
|
#153
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Debate Revisited.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
|
So will women be peeing on sticks at the border or will blood be drawn?
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 01:50 PM
|
#154
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 01:53 PM
|
#155
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you were talking to prosecutor, and she said something to you about what criminals do, I'm sure you'd say, you don't have any real world experience -- you don't represent criminals. And that would go over well.
Also, as a lawyer who has worked inside different companies for many years, it's pretty rich to hear an outside lawyer suggest that working in a law firm gives you some special insight into its clients' business. I wish.
|
Dim....
I once represented a bank in a patent lawsuit about ATM display screens for Casinos. I wouldn't claim to understand the financial crisis. I did learn about how bad degenerate gamblers are. IIRC you were not working in regulating, in fact not working with companies at all, you were involved in prosecuting certain actions against companies.
As to your experiences working inside, and your thoughts about the firms your company hires, you might want to blame your GC.... oh, wait, sorry....no offense.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 02:15 PM
|
#156
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
I wouldn't claim to understand the financial crisis.
|
Ask an antitrust lawyer who spent years working in that space.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 02:24 PM
|
#157
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Ask an antitrust lawyer who spent years working in that space.
|
Why? If he were smart I'd expect he'd tell me to ask Thurgreed.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 01-23-2020 at 02:26 PM..
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 02:46 PM
|
#158
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
Why? If he were smart I'd expect he'd tell me to ask Thurgreed.
|
If you want to understand why the markets failed, it makes sense to talk to someone who was paid to understand how the markets work, and who worked on clearance for transactions that happened during the crisis.
But, hey, you be you.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 03:04 PM
|
#159
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you want to understand why the markets failed, it makes sense to talk to someone who was paid to understand how the markets work, and who worked on clearance for transactions that happened during the crisis.
But, hey, you be you.
|
So if I wanted to know all about how New York City moves, I should to talk Ralph Kramden's friend Norton?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 03:53 PM
|
#160
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
So if I wanted to know all about how New York City moves, I should to talk Ralph Kramden's friend Norton?
|
OK, boomer.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 04:32 PM
|
#161
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,162
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you want to understand why the markets failed, it makes sense to talk to someone who was paid to understand how the markets work, and who worked on clearance for transactions that happened during the crisis.
But, hey, you be you.
|
I'd ask if you worked on the only 24 hour early termination I've ever personally witnessed, but I don't recall which two banks were involved (and wouldn't name them anyway).
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 04:54 PM
|
#162
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,132
|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
I'd ask if you worked on the only 24 hour early termination I've ever personally witnessed, but I don't recall which two banks were involved (and wouldn't name them anyway).
|
Adder during those years at work he had to only be reading blogs about why W needed to be impeached and posting them here. He had a new theory every day. There is no way he had time to have any significant role in a real matter. The only termination he worked on there was when he left.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 01-23-2020 at 05:15 PM..
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 05:27 PM
|
#163
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,211
|
Thou shalt not..
predict. Or speculate.
But just for the sake of envisioning this black swan... What if Trump were convicted and removed?
How would he react?
His 40% react?
The market react? (I think it’d do little, perhaps even rise.)
Civil unrest?
End of the GOP?
Bernie crushing Joe as last populist standing?
Joe crushing Bernie in a grand “return to normalcy”?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 05:38 PM
|
#164
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Thou shalt not..
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
predict. Or speculate.
But just for the sake of envisioning this black swan... What if Trump were convicted and removed?
How would he react?
His 40% react?
The market react? (I think it’d do little, perhaps even rise.)
Civil unrest?
End of the GOP?
Bernie crushing Joe as last populist standing?
Joe crushing Bernie in a grand “return to normalcy”?
|
I'm looking for the "crawl back under their rocks" option. That's what I'm hoping for. That some of these reptiles just get back under the rocks.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
01-23-2020, 09:17 PM
|
#165
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,057
|
Re: Thou shalt not..
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
predict. Or speculate.
But just for the sake of envisioning this black swan... What if Trump were convicted and removed?
How would he react?
His 40% react?
The market react? (I think it’d do little, perhaps even rise.)
Civil unrest?
End of the GOP?
Bernie crushing Joe as last populist standing?
Joe crushing Bernie in a grand “return to normalcy”?
|
Conservatives would love a good stab in the back.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|