LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 714
0 members and 714 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2003, 02:59 PM   #17206
LessinSF
Wearing the cranky pants
 
LessinSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
Spoiler Timmy and BB4

No super-spoilers
Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Erika is ~32. She bears some resemblance to my fiance, so I'm a big fan.
And Paigs, Robert is the other person over 30. Edited to add that Paigs should learn what ~ means before she jumps down anyone's throat.

Quote:
Once it's down to 3, there's an HoH competition and winner decides who they take to the finals.
But unlike last year, the jury will be sequestered so they will not have seen what was said about them in the diary room, which was why Danielle lost last year.

Quote:
Dana will not get a single vote this week, even from Justin. Bank on it. ... Alison is the highest of high comedy. She is so stupid-petty about this Dana thing.
I don't know. It may be a 3-3 tie, with Alison breaking it. Nevertheless, she has shown herself to not be smart (in accordance with the first rule of reality television - any person who proclaims themselves something, whether intelligent, pretty, or "going to get someone if its the last thing they do" isn't). The only smart move was Justin and Dana together.

Quote:
Last night, the "Nathan-is-gay" thing cracked my ass up. I don't think Nathan is gay, Auntie Twats.
He is known as Oklahomo or Okmo on some bulletin boards.

Additional thoughts:

1. Didn't any of them actually play battleship as a kid? You don't put yourself diagonally across the board to make it easy to find you. Sheesh.

2. And Jun is getting laaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrger.
__________________
Boogers!

Last edited by LessinSF; 08-06-2003 at 03:04 PM..
LessinSF is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:06 PM   #17207
LessinSF
Wearing the cranky pants
 
LessinSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,119
While I'm on the subject

Cupid -

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

I think Robert A wasn't kicked off because America was too stupid to tell the two Roberts apart.
__________________
Boogers!
LessinSF is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:10 PM   #17208
paigowprincess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Spoiler Timmy and BB4

Quote:
Originally posted by LessinSF
No super-spoilers
And Paigs, Robert is the other person over 30. Edited to add that Paigs should learn what ~ means before she jumps down anyone's throat.


But unlike last year, the jury will be sequestered so they will not have seen what was said about them in the diary room, which was why Danielle lost last year.


I don't know. It may be a 3-3 tie, with Alison breaking it. Nevertheless, she has shown herself to not be smart (in accordance with the first rule of reality television - any person who proclaims themselves something, whether intelligent, pretty, or "going to get someone if its the last thing they do" isn't). The only smart move was Justin and Dana together.


He is known as Oklahomo or Okmo on some bulletin boards.

Additional thoughts:

1. Didn't any of them actually play battleship as a kid? You don't put yourself diagonally across the board to make it easy to find you. Sheesh.

2. And Jun is getting laaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrger.
I am not following the feeds so I defer to Lester on this one but I intiitally thought it would be 3 to 3 with a Allison tiebreak. but then. if Robert and Justin already know this (and Jee if he sticks with his Macchiavellan alliance with the sumo wrestler), then why alienate Jun who they need on their side for an exercise in futility? i wish I could think of a way for this to be a surprise outcome but I just cant see Erika and Jack voting to keep Dana (unless of course they decide to decimate the original alliance and make nice with the boys, but I dont think so).

Jun looked huge but then I remember that early shot of her flabby, jiggly body shaking as she walked around. She must be the fattest asian chick I have seen who isnt over fifty. She should go just for thinking she is all that.
 
Old 08-06-2003, 03:13 PM   #17209
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
Tying it all together somehow

Quote:
Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Nope. Does Miller make an ice beer? Not that I would try it.
Don't know if they still do, but they used to .

You may remember this illiminating the bars at which you downed your Bud Ice:



(At least, I think that's what Burger was referring to.)

If you don't drink it, you may have learned about it in -- well -- an ad.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:20 PM   #17210
dtb
I am beyond a rank!
 
dtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
Tying it all together somehow

Quote:
Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
I really hate the adds. I sincerely hope that the "band" that does that twins song drives their bus over a cliff.
I think Coors Light is missing the mark by a wide margin if their target demographic is 30-something males (actually, no idea if Ollie is a 30-something, but I do know that my husband is...).

To wit: when they had that campaign running that had giant-sized people sticking keg taps into the "Rockies" and the concurrent -- and really annoying -- jingle that went "Tap the Rockies --- Coors Light..." on an endless loop, every time it would come on my husband would go ballistic. Now, I'm not talking about a simple derisive snort and a "what a dumb ad" comment. He would really get upset about it. "HOW CAN THEY RUN SUCH A STUUUUUUUUUPID AD? IT'S SO AWFUL -- I HATE IT!!!!I CANT STAND THIS AD I mean, he was really beside himself.

He wouldn't be one to drink Coors Light anyway, but even if he were so inclined, after seeing that ad, he'd go out of his way to avoid it!
dtb is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:24 PM   #17211
idle acts
Moderator
 
idle acts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 217
Mixed Messages

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
The Episcopal Church in America is 2.5 million members and shrinking. The worldwide Anglican Communion of which it is a member is 77 million members and growing.
I bow to your superior knowledge of the Episcopal/Anglican Church. . .

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
. . . church in America . . . . simply do[es]n't want to admit that homosexuality is now placed in a category with other Hebrew Scripture condemnations we totally ignore in modern life.

* * *
. . . and I agree that would have been a cleaner approach to the issue.
idle acts is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:28 PM   #17212
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Tying it all together somehow

Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap


(At least, I think that's what Burger was referring to.)
I really don't follow the current bud and miller product offerings. They're all virtually indistinguishable to me. Bud Ice? Miller Ice? Icehouse? Bud Light Ice? Bud Ice Lite? Coors Light? Is there really a difference, other than the relative skankiness of the chick's one is lead to believe can be picked up by drinking one or the other?

As for ads, I think Coors has retired the trophy for insipidness. Sure, chick's mud wrestling has it's PC issues, but the concept at least had a modicum of creativity beyond "let's picture people partying and holding a coors."
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:31 PM   #17213
Anne Elk
Apathy rocks!
 
Anne Elk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: under a rock
Posts: 2,711
Kobe and Stuff

I have not been following this closely, but the SO just called to share the following:

Kobe and the victim acknowledge consensual sex, in the traditional Tab A into Slot B context. The problem arose when Kobe attempted to insert Tab A into Slot C. That was not consensual and apparently the hospital visit was required because the victim's Slot C needed to be repaired due to Tab A's size.

Anne
I'm with TF. No Slot C action for me.
__________________
All our final decisions are made in a state of mind that not going to last. - Proust
Anne Elk is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:36 PM   #17214
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
TRI(as in "I'll tri some more cheesecake, please")athlete

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Every party you ever go to, there is some big fat guy in the corner, swilling on a beer and muching on chips, who will takes pot shots at everyone else around him to anyone who will listen. And often, most of his bitter, nasty rants are amusing.
Dude, Penske is rarely bitter or nasty.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:44 PM   #17215
ThrashersFan
Puck You
 
ThrashersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrounded by idiots and assholes.
Posts: 1,076
Tying it all together somehow

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I really don't follow the current bud and miller product offerings. They're all virtually indistinguishable to me. Bud Ice? Miller Ice? Icehouse? Bud Light Ice? Bud Ice Lite? Coors Light? Is there really a difference, other than the relative skankiness of the chick's one is lead to believe can be picked up by drinking one or the other?
I find it sad that hooking up would be based on beer choice and figure that anyone picking up or being picked up based on what they are drinking is probably fairly shallow in either case, but that is just my opinion. I drink what I drink and I like it but I really don't think that it in any way defines me (except maybe that I am loyal and/or not real open to change when it comes to the basics) or my personality (other than maybe that I am not a fucking tight-ass who judges people based on their choice of beverage and makes my own choices based on how other people will view me for them).
__________________
When you say Budweiser you've said it all.
ThrashersFan is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:45 PM   #17216
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Kobe and Stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by Anne Elk
I have not been following this closely, but the SO just called to share the following:

Kobe and the victim acknowledge consensual sex, in the traditional Tab A into Slot B context. The problem arose when Kobe attempted to insert Tab A into Slot C. That was not consensual and apparently the hospital visit was required because the victim's Slot C needed to be repaired due to Tab A's size.

Anne
I'm with TF. No Slot C action for me.
That's what happens when you cruise for chicks at Ikea.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:46 PM   #17217
ThrashersFan
Puck You
 
ThrashersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrounded by idiots and assholes.
Posts: 1,076
Kobe and Stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by Anne Elk
I have not been following this closely, but the SO just called to share the following:

Kobe and the victim acknowledge consensual sex, in the traditional Tab A into Slot B context. The problem arose when Kobe attempted to insert Tab A into Slot C. That was not consensual and apparently the hospital visit was required because the victim's Slot C needed to be repaired due to Tab A's size.

Anne
I'm with TF. No Slot C action for me.
I would like to assure everyone that I have never been to Colorado, have never met Kobe Bryant and don't even follow basketball. For the record, I am not the "Colorado Slot C" girl.
__________________
When you say Budweiser you've said it all.
ThrashersFan is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:56 PM   #17218
mmm3587
Fast left eighty slippy
 
mmm3587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,236
Spoiler Timmy and BB4

SPOILERS:
























Quote:
Originally posted by paigowprincess
I am not following the feeds so I defer to Lester on this one but I intiitally thought it would be 3 to 3 with a Allison tiebreak. but then. if Robert and Justin already know this (and Jee if he sticks with his Macchiavellan alliance with the sumo wrestler), then why alienate Jun who they need on their side for an exercise in futility? i wish I could think of a way for this to be a surprise outcome but I just cant see Erika and Jack voting to keep Dana (unless of course they decide to decimate the original alliance and make nice with the boys, but I dont think so).

Jun looked huge but then I remember that early shot of her flabby, jiggly body shaking as she walked around. She must be the fattest asian chick I have seen who isnt over fifty. She should go just for thinking she is all that.
They had a segment about Jun's weight and how she eats all the time. They also showed before and after pictures. It was remarkable. I didn't know that you could gain that much weight in a month.

I think that Jack and Erika are the two smartest players in the game in terms of strategy. Neither has won anything, and they've both been up on the block a couple of times. I would think that they would want to keep Jun, as they can probably convince her to help them out if they vote for Dana, or at least she can lie to them that she would go with them. If they keep Dana, she is still going to try to pick them off. Plus, Dana makes it harder for them to keep Allison and Nathan as part of their alliance without Allison going all apeshit. If they get rid of Dana, Allison is probably done going nuts and they can just get her to vote with them and pick her off when the time comes. Nathan is already a target, too.

With one of Jun or Dana gone, the other is probably with the ex-alliance, so they have four. The others have four, too, although if they keep Jun they might be able to get her to vote with them. So, I think that the exes vote to keep Dana, because they can trust her, and she is not really hurting them. They just can't tell her anything they want to be a secret.

Jack and Erika vote to keep Jun, and Nathan is the deciding factor (because we know that Allison will vote Dana off if she gets to break the tie). I think Nathan is smart enough to vote to keep Jun, but maybe they won't be able to convince her to help them. She seems like she is really kissing Jee's ass lately, although she also seems pretty manipulative.

When is the food competition night? I can't keep the order of stuff straight. Is it:

Wednesday: elimination voting and new HoH competition
Friday: nomination and food competition
Tuesday: veto competition and veto ceremony

If the food competition was on Friday, what happened? I'd like to see that factor into the strategy more. Also, when are the luxury competitions? The few previous Big Brother episodes I saw seemed to make a bigger deal of that. Don't they not have a washing machine? I couldn't live like that for long.

Also, is the fact that Jun is such a good cook going to help her stay around?
Dana would probably be loyal to the three remaining exes until the end, but she's also not going to win. Everyone hates here, and she will manage to piss the exes off, too, and she'll be the first to go of them
mmm3587 is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:57 PM   #17219
leagleaze
I didn't do it.
 
leagleaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
Kobe and Stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by Anne Elk
I have not been following this closely, but the SO just called to share the following:

Kobe and the victim acknowledge consensual sex, in the traditional Tab A into Slot B context. The problem arose when Kobe attempted to insert Tab A into Slot C. That was not consensual and apparently the hospital visit was required because the victim's Slot C needed to be repaired due to Tab A's size.

Anne
I'm with TF. No Slot C action for me.
And in his world forcing yourself in slot C when you are told not to is consensual? What a world.
leagleaze is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:58 PM   #17220
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Kobe and Stuff

Quote:
Originally posted by leagleaze
And in his world forcing yourself in slot C when you are told not to is consensual? What a world.
Is she arguing that the slot C part was not consensual and he is arguing that it was consensual? Or have they both conceded that the slot C part was not consensual? Goodness. In my world forcing yourself into any slot when you are told not to is not consensual.
ltl/fb is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.