Making a buck cleaning Lester's spittle trays on Sequels' 22-year old supermodel abs

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Google says her:



TM

Her TITS make her hands look tiny. I bet Sebby's giant balls have the same effect on his crank.

DICK JOKE ZING!

[SlaveNoMore]

sebastian_dangerfield
Your points are well taken, but you know what? He really should have considered the consequences of what he was doing when he did it. There are some times in life where whatever you're getting ($, pussy, a free pass out of trouble) is just toooo easy, and you know its going to come back and bite you in the ass.

FWIW, I never sued that Maude Lebowski wannabe - and my damages have been incalcuable.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
He wants revenge, and I don't think it's because his feewing were huwt. Given how harshly a jury would likely view her, he has a chance, if he can get it past a judge. Of course, having conceded that everything she said is true may make that difficult.

Her book comes out next month. A friend in a bookstore said that they got the ARC this week. Author blurb:

In May 2004, 26-year-old JESSICA CUTLER was thrust into the public eye when the online diary she kept for her friends exploded into Washington's scandale du jour. Immediately fired from her job as mail girl in the office of Senator Mike DeWine (for "unacceptable use of Senate computers"), Jessica remains unemployed in Washington DC.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I want gwinky to kick her in the head.

ooooooh. happily.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by bilmore
I meant that, simply as an economic question for the lawyer thinking of taking his lawsuit, this would be a worthwhile risk - the chances of success are even, I think, and there's money to collect.

Seems like that economic proposition was fair at the outset (as in, hey, law school buddy, can you draft a complaint for me?). And they draft the complaint, send it to her, and demand a settlement or they file. She called his bluff, and he filed. Oh well-it's good pub. for her book.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
He wants revenge, and I don't think it's because his feewing were huwt. Given how harshly a jury would likely view her, he has a chance, if he can get it past a judge. Of course, having conceded that everything she said is true may make that difficult.

I think that, when banging a younger staffer in DC, the reasonable person foresees many bad consequences. Having the whole story published internationally, to the detriment of one's career, may not be within that "reasonable" range. He's got a good shot at this. I've seen almost this exact case win, for moderate returns.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Her book comes out next month. A friend in a bookstore said that they got the ARC this week. Author blurb:

She said thrust. Heh.

I love this "journal she kept for her friends." What?! It became public?!! And everyone on the Hill knows about it? But I never wanted this kind of attention!

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
This is a very good point, esp. considering that he's in a fucking political job and really should have better instincts. However, while I do not espouse using the judicial system to do this, I think that chick deserves a little comeuppance (did somebody make this bad pun already?)

I want gwinky to kick her in the head.

She gets her comeuppance, again and again. They remove them every three or four months when she has an emergency appt with her gyno. She has more strange rashes and growths than a floor in a homeless shelter.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Was she a well-known tramp before her blog became publicized?

Isn't "well-known tramp" redundant?

TM

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
FWIW, I never sued that Maude Lebowski wannabe - and my damages have been incalcuable.

in your case it's been kept totally anonymous. What damages?

[bilmore]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
in your case it's been kept totally anonymous. What damages?

Significant lost-opportunity costs.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
She gets her comeuppance, again and again. They remove them every three or four months when she has an emergency appt with her gyno. She has more strange rashes and growths than a floor in a homeless shelter.

The crush is back.

(Even though you're repulsed by me. Call me in February, okay?!)

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by robustpuppy
She said thrust. Heh.

I love this "journal she kept for her friends." What?! It became public?!! And everyone on the Hill knows about it? But I never wanted this kind of attention!

Most blogs have very small readership.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
So, because every young attorney needs three cars, I didn't get rid of my saab when I bought my new car. Now the stereo panel died on it, so I can listen to a CD but I can't change the track etc and can't change the radio station when there's no CD in it.

Do I cough up the money to fix it at the Saab place;

Get rid of the damn money pit; or

Get a non-saab stereo put in and have it last longer that my POS car?


TIA

Go bill.

TM

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by bilmore
Significant lost-opportunity costs.

The Charlie effect?