The New And Improved Fashion Board

[SlaveNoMore]

dtb
What's your feeling on current druggies with adequate-to-decent vocabularies?

I thought Shifter was taken?

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally posted by dtb
What's your feeling on current druggies with adequate-to-decent vocabularies?

She digs me.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Spanky
Wouldn't you agree that there are many African American leaders that feel entitled to make anti-semitic remarks?

Go back and answer the question.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Go back and answer the question.

I did.

[dtb]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I thought Shifter was taken?

Let's just say inquiries have been made.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Spanky
You, Shape Shifter, and Taxwonk.

Find the posts. You'll see I never complained - I only ridiculed you.

If you notice, on my posts I respond specifically to every point. I go out of my way to make my response right after every point, that is why my posts are always interrupted by quotes from the person I am addressing. Yet TM often just makes a generalized comment below my entire post incorrectly summarizing what I said. I don't have to summarize what he says (at least if it is from a recent post), because I address his quotes directly. Yet you are saying I am not responding to him but he is responding to me?

The problem is, you don't read very carefully.

This is so ripe. TM keeps accusing me of being obsessively focused on one issue and then at the same time going off on tangents. Which is it? How can I be ridiculously focused on one issue and then taking the argument out on tangents?

This whole thing started because I objected to his statement that because Caucasians had all the power and black people did not that that gave black people a license to make racist comments about white people. That is the only thing I objected to, and as TM said, I was obsessively focused on that one issue. As far as I was concerned that was the only issue. Any discussion I was having was concerning that issue or directly related to that issue. Somehow, in his mind, he thought we were debating many other things.

That's not what I remember.

After we get into a disucssion I only respond to posts. In fact I always quote what the other person said (unless I am talking about something that was said a few posts back because then I am too lazy to go that far back). If I have nothing to quote, I have nothing to post. You look at all my prior exchanges you will see that they are structured that way. I always let people speak for themsevles and quote them As I said, you stop posting I will. If you are willing to let me have the last word the discussion stops. However, you guys are never willing to let me have the last word, so the posting continues.

No, one of the things I pointed out was that you kept posting more even after he had stopped responding - you went back and found a prior post of his.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Spanky
I did.

No, you asked a question.

Tell me what racist remarks TM wants to make. Or wants to defend others in making.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Spanky
You, Shape Shifter, and Taxwonk.

You have the reading comprehension of a Hostess at a Gentlemens Club. I challenge you to find a single post where I whined about the length or content of your exchange with Thurgreed on this matter. When I lived in Hyperborea, I encountered many Hyperboreans with poor reading comprehension, but they could comprende the habla el readingo much better than you. Is it because you don't care, or is Thurgreed right, and you actually are stupid?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Yeah, it is pretty special to be known as "Andrew's chick who squirts." Really. His friends always offer me opium also. Must be a generational thing? Anyway, now I am into rehabilitated druggies, not current druggies with limited vocabularies.

Oooooh. I don't meet the friends.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
spanky is a honky.

This goes without saying. And I don't see anything racist about it - it is a simple description of fact. Like saying nonononononono is a sex goddess.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy


That's not what I remember.

I said: "This is so ripe. TM keeps accusing me of being obsessively focused on one issue and then at the same time going off on tangents. Which is it? How can I be ridiculously focused on one issue and then taking the argument out on tangents?"

Are you saying that TM never accused me of being obssed with that one issue? Do I really need to go back and find that quote, or are you saying you don't remember me saying something else.

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
No, one of the things I pointed out was that you kept posting more even after he had stopped responding - you went back and found a prior post of his.

When did I do that? Sometimes when he makes multiple posts I don't respond to them in the proper order, but when have I ever reached way back to respond to a post. Or kept responding to someone who had stopped posting about the subject? I have never done that.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
No, you asked a question.

Tell me what racist remarks TM wants to make. Or wants to defend others in making.

How the hell would I know? Am I supposed to read his mind?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Spanky
I said: "This is so ripe. TM keeps accusing me of being obsessively focused on one issue and then at the same time going off on tangents. Which is it? How can I be ridiculously focused on one issue and then taking the argument out on tangents?"

Are you saying that TM never accused me of being obssed with that one issue? Do I really need to go back and find that quote, or are you saying you don't remember me saying something else.




When did I do that? Sometimes when he makes multiple posts I don't respond to them in the proper order, but when have I ever reached way back to respond to a post. Or kept responding to someone who had stopped posting about the subject? I have never done that.

OK, granted I didn't read this, but I don't think it's about squirting or other FB-appropriate stuff. It seems more like a PB topic.

[NotFromHere]

Jesus, I leave you people alone for a day and you get all disgusting on me.


Scientists develop male birth control pill
Single dose, hormone-free drug prevents ejaculation of sperm

What's the point? To take all the fun out?

The scientists found the solution after noticing that drugs used in the treatment of schizophrenia and high blood pressure were effective at preventing ejaculation, according to a report in the British newspaper "The Guardian Unlimited."
"Within half a day, the sperm is on the move again," says Smith.

Poor things. All claustrophobic and what.


Let me out.

Seriously, isn't that going to take some of the fun out?

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally posted by Spanky
How the hell would I know? Am I supposed to read his mind?

You think TM's whole point is that he wants to be able to make racist statements, or that he wants to defend others in making racist statements. The only thing you can come up with is that some unnamed black leaders have made anti-semitic statements. What leads you to think that this is what TM's argument was about?

Perhaps TM was not focused on how badly he wants to abuse that bagel-eater TaxWonk. I don't think you should be impugning TM as an anti-semite here. It is offensive.

Maybe, if you rack that little brain of yours, you'll discover TM was making a different point.