LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 349
1 members and 348 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2005, 07:48 PM   #1801
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Cannon Law Question

When does Bush become Pope?
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 07:51 PM   #1802
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
Ty- now is it a scandal?

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm defending the proposition that torture is not always morally wrong.

Force is also justified outside of the self-defence context.
When? On your ipse dixit?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 08:01 PM   #1803
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,049
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
It takes guts to say this to me following your little cow homily.
That's undeniably droll, but you should know that you don't want to refer to a "cow" as "he," and that if you are talking about a male bovine, it shouldn't be depicted as having an udder. Come to think of it, this is the same sort of deep understanding of the facts that informs your posts on Iraq.

Would you rather I post a homily about elephants?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 10:03 PM   #1804
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Add This One to the List

  • WASHINGTON - Former national security adviser Sandy Berger will plead guilty to taking classified material from the National Archives, a misdemeanor, the Justice Department said Thursday.

    Berger is expected to appear in federal court in Washington on Friday, said Justice spokesman Bryan Sierra.

    The former Clinton administration official previously acknowledged he removed from the National Archives copies of documents about the government's anti-terror efforts and notes that he took on those documents. He said he was reviewing the materials to help determine which Clinton administration documents to provide to the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

    He called the episode "an honest mistake," and denied criminal wrongdoing.

    Berger and his lawyer, Lanny Breuer, have said Berger knowingly removed the handwritten notes by placing them in his jacket and pants and inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio. He returned most of the documents, but some still are missing.

    The charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material is a misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison and up to a $100,000 fine.

    The materials related to a 2000 report on how government reacted to the terror threat prior to the millennium celebrations.

    Berger stepped down as an adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's campaign last July after The Associated Press reported that the Justice Department was investigating the matter.

    Many Democrats, including former President Clinton, suggested politics were behind disclosure of the probe only days before the release of the Sept. 11 commission report, which Republicans feared would be a blow to President Bush's re-election campaign.


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...be_3&printer=1
sgtclub is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 11:01 PM   #1805
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
So Peggy Noonan agrees with me . . .

"Republicans--I have been among many--are now in the stage of the Hillary Conversation in which they are beginning to grouse about those who keep warning that Mrs. Clinton will be a formidable candidate for president in 2008. She won't be so tough, they say. America will never elect a woman like her, with such a sketchy history--financial scandals, political pardons, the whole mess that took place between 1980 and 2000.

"I tell them they are wrong. First, it is good to be concerned about Mrs. Clinton, for she is coming down the pike. It is pointless to be afraid, but good to be concerned. Why? Because we live in a more or less 50-50 nation; because Mrs. Clinton is smarter than her husband and has become a better campaigner on the ground; because her warmth and humor seem less oily; because she has struck out a new rhetorically (though not legislatively) moderate course; because you don't play every card right the way she's been playing every card right the past five years unless you have real talent; because unlike her husband she has found it possible to grow more emotionally mature; because the presidency is the bright sharp focus of everything she does each day; because she is not going to get seriously dinged in the 2008 primaries but will likely face challengers who make her look even more moderate and stable; and because in 2008 we will have millions of 18- to 24-year-old voters who have no memory of her as the harridan of the East Wing and the nutty professor of HillaryCare.

"The Hillary those young adults remember will be the senator--chuckling with a throaty chuckle, bantering amiably with Lindsey Graham, maternal and moderate and strong. Add to that this: Half the MSM will be for her, and the other half will be afraid of the half that is for her. (You think journalists are afraid of the right? Journalists are afraid of each other.) And on top of all that, It's time for a woman. Almost every young woman in America, every tough old suburban momma, every unmarried urban high-heel-wearing, briefcase-toting corporate lawyer will be saying it. They'll be working for, rooting for, giving to the woman.

"I am of course exaggerating, but not by much.

"Can a Republican beat her? Sure. She'll have to make mistakes, and she will. And he (it will be a he; it's not Condi, because the presidency is not an entry-level political office) will have to be someone who stands for big, serious and solidly conservative things, and really means it, which will mark a nice contrast with Mrs. Clinton, who believes only in herself. He will also have to be able to do the delicate dance of running against a woman without seeming scared, patronizing, nervous or macho. It isn't going to be easy. But it's doable."

(OpinionJournal, today.)
bilmore is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 11:16 PM   #1806
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
So Peggy Noonan agrees with me . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Hillary - the next POTUS
I think she is going to be really tough to beat. I also think that Peggy overly discounts Condi's chances. Put aside everything other than electability, she could neutralize the female factor and cut into the black vote.
sgtclub is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 12:06 AM   #1807
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Does anyone know of a good long distance company? One of those smaller ones that gives really good rates.
Spanky is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 12:24 AM   #1808
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Interesting progression:

1. The war will not bring elections.
2. The elections will be a farce.
3. The war and the elections will have no effect on anyone else.
4. Everyone else was already democratic. (Or, they had cows. I'm not sure which.)
You are getting better and better at straw men.

Have you thought of going into politics?
Adder is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 12:52 AM   #1809
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
You are getting better and better at straw men.

Have you thought of going into politics?
ftr,fww, When I stated earlier that me and the snake (or the worm) had reached an agreement on the rules about torture I was referring to Adder and not shape shifter.
Spanky is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 01:01 AM   #1810
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
You are getting better and better at straw men.
Strawmen? No.

Fun exaggeration? Of course. Ty points out that, while we idiot Republicans weren't looking, the SA masses have been fighting for some bit of social power from, and acountability for, their evil overlords, who in turn have been chuckling nastily as they count the bux we regularly send their way. So, no, says Ty, we can't take any Iraq-war-spreading-the-feeling credit for their unrest.

If you look at my progression, you can see it nicely through the pages of posts here. I left off step 5 - the "so now they're democratic, and they're electing people we don't like!" meme - because I didn't want to seem too prescient. It intimidates people, ya know.

Quote:
Have you thought of going into politics?
Low pay. No thanks.
bilmore is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 01:16 AM   #1811
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
If you look at my progression, you can see it nicely through the pages of posts here. I left off step 5 - the "so now they're democratic, and they're electing people we don't like!" meme - because I didn't want to seem too prescient. It intimidates people, ya know.
Holy shit. It's like ... you can read our stereotype like a book.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 01:18 AM   #1812
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
promoting democracy in the Middle East

Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Holy shit. It's like ... you can read our stereotype like a book.
And I can juggle, too.

Yet, I can still stop and speak with the little people.
bilmore is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 10:36 AM   #1813
Did you just call me Coltrane?
Registered User
 
Did you just call me Coltrane?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub
Posts: 14,743
So Peggy Noonan agrees with me . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I think she is going to be really tough to beat. I also think that Peggy overly discounts Condi's chances. Put aside everything other than electability, she could neutralize the female factor and cut into the black vote.
Stop it. Both you and Bilmore. We know what you're doing. We know Hil can't win. Stop trying to provoke us into supporting her for 2008.
__________________
No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
Did you just call me Coltrane? is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 11:22 AM   #1814
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
So Peggy Noonan agrees with me . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Stop it. Both you and Bilmore. We know what you're doing. We know Hil can't win. Stop trying to provoke us into supporting her for 2008.
There's no question that she's your nominee. And she can certainly win. I say this, not as a jedi mind trick, but because at one point in time I hated her far more than DU hates Bush.
sgtclub is offline  
Old 04-01-2005, 11:27 AM   #1815
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
It's all moot, anyway . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
There's no question that she's your nominee. And she can certainly win. I say this, not as a jedi mind trick, but because at one point in time I hated her far more than DU hates Bush.
Doesn't matter. According to a noted Koranic scholar, we won't even get there.

(US will cease to exist in 2007.)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...=1111980180248
bilmore is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.