» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 467 |
0 members and 467 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM. |
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
08-13-2003, 10:10 PM
|
#18361
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
|
Twinkle Twinkle
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Quote:
Another sad example of over-engineering in materials selection.
|
Quote:
Yeah, but after a while some woman or another in your life winds up calling in five gay guys to make you "better."
|
Atticus, love, I'm worried about you. You should come over for a drink. I'll make you all better.
Last edited by robustpuppy; 08-13-2003 at 10:14 PM..
|
|
|
08-13-2003, 10:11 PM
|
#18362
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 543
|
QE
Quote:
Originally posted by bridge of love
plus I bet your porno isn't strewn all about the place, but is well organized
|
Speaking of porno, I have a video clip of a girl, giving a blow job, who happens to look exactly like the now-fiancee of the former stripper guy whom the Fab 5 loved.
|
|
|
08-13-2003, 10:15 PM
|
#18363
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
|
Perfection??
Quote:
Originally posted by barely_legal
An engagement big-screen TV would be ok too.
|
Why not just wear a giant neon sign saying "Someone please propose to me?" ![Wink](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Last edited by Adder; 08-14-2003 at 12:22 AM..
|
|
|
08-13-2003, 11:17 PM
|
#18364
|
no rank for you
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nowhere
Posts: 123
|
Scare your partners
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Quote:
The frivolous things I buy are inherently valuable because they have received my imprimatur of cool merely through the fact that I purchased them.
|
Quite, I'll bet you could auction off stock certificates from Infirmation for quite the pretty penny if they were emblazoned with the PLF signature.
|
|
|
08-13-2003, 11:28 PM
|
#18365
|
no rank for you
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nowhere
Posts: 123
|
Twinkle Twinkle
Originally posted by AG
Quote:
Another sad example of over-engineering in materials selection.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, but after a while some woman or another in your life winds up calling in five gay guys to make you "better."
|
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Quote:
Atticus, love, I'm worried about you. You should come over for a drink. I'll make you all better.
|
If you're lucky, you get as far as another Fbetty. She got him to say he was wistfully turning his wedding ring.
|
|
|
08-13-2003, 11:33 PM
|
#18366
|
Apathy rocks!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: under a rock
Posts: 2,711
|
Synthetic Diamonds
Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Our condolences. :sniffle:
Remember, those rings can also come from your fiancee's Gma!
|
Not likely. Not a lot of jewelry in his family. Besides, I haven't met his grandma (yet).
And who isn't on the California recall ballot, Gallagher is.
Scary!
Edited to add Gallagher comment to prevent cereal posting.
__________________
All our final decisions are made in a state of mind that not going to last. - Proust
Last edited by Anne Elk; 08-14-2003 at 12:15 AM..
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 12:37 AM
|
#18367
|
I am beyond a rank!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,160
|
Uniqueness... Fabulousness.... Outstandingness...
I was about to feel all special. But then I didn't.
Ad(not good enough to post)der
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 09:09 AM
|
#18368
|
Guest
|
Synthetic Diamonds
Quote:
Originally posted by SEC_Chick
I told the SO that if he wanted, he could return the ring and get me an authentic reproduction of J-Ho-s ring for $39.95. Even if it were real, I still wouldn't wear it. Just another example of how expensive doesn't equal tasteful. Heck, for as much as the ring cost, Ben should gave bought the reproduction.
|
Is the real reason you posted this to let us know you are engaged?
Quote:
Merging threads... on BB4: WHat did you all think of the Erica/I want to be JHo thing? The pink boots were disturbing, and someone in their 30s trying to be Jlo seems wrong.
|
While trying to be like JHo is indeed wrong, in Erika's case, I don't think the age thing is why as they are the same age. JHo's motto seems to be the Dolly Parton quote "It takes a lot of money to look this cheap"
And speaking of it takes a lot of money to look this cheap, a gal I know has one of those hideous LV bags with the LV logo all over it. I think this was discussed before, but this has got to be the epitome of lots of money to look cheap bc the only purpose of this bag that I can see is to announce that you own a LV bag of X dollars. And if that aint tacky, I dont know what is. I guess its like fake tits in that manner- spending four or ten thousand to look tacky.
and back to BB4 since I have decided to compete against PJ in the Race for the Personal K (burger is within five, and I havent seen leagl's number yet), does anyone know who won HOH? I know Jack says his strategy is to not win anything, but, if he wants it I bet he wins. To paraphrase DeNiro "I am a very patient man, fokker. Thats what eighteen months in a Vietnamese prison camp will do to you".
I cant believe Nathan was voted out in a clean sweep. How dumb are these people? They are the bizarro macchiavellis. I am praying to the Good Lord Jesus that Alli goes. Those ponytails were the last straw. Frosh fifteen bulldogs should not wear ponytails, especially when they enhance your roots. She is such trash. Someone buy her a nosejob and a muzzle.
edited to fix quote codes by e/o.
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 09:15 AM
|
#18369
|
Guest
|
Synthetic Diamonds
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
It sounds like you are disgusted by pretty much all consumer goods.
I hear what you are saying - women have been mass brainwashed regarding diamonds in a way that is startling to me, and I cannot help feel a little less respect for even close friends who get hung up on the size of their diamond rings. But I have been known to buy expensive non-functional things because I think they are cool. So who am I to criticize? To answer my own question, I am Pretty Little Flower, a man of exquisite and superior taste and style. The frivolous things I buy are inherently valuable because they have received my imprimatur of cool merely through the fact that I purchased them. And if I choose to look upon you with disdain because you follow sheep-like into the DeBeers marketing trap, then I will do so, you stupid shallow little fuck of a woman. You know what that two carat diamond means to a guy? It means that, with the extra carat, he just purchased a license to get a blow job from your maid of honor at your wedding. By spending the extra $3000 on your gaudy diamond engagement ring, he just obtained implicit permission to fuck some skanky hooker at his bachelor party. But what do you care? You have a rock so big that that even the bitchy trophy wife secretary down the hall is jealous.
|
What a terrible thing to say about Momsquared!!!
Not discussing the size of my mom's rock, even though she is still Mommy From the Block bc that would be gauche! Totally not garden party chic.
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 09:35 AM
|
#18370
|
Guest
|
Twinkle Twinkle
Real reason I posted this: to show I am FB Cool despite my ever changing unfunny skek monikers and my misogyny
Hey Coup, I know you wont see this for another fifteen hours, but what does this turning the wedding ring mean?
Quote:
Originally posted by ias_39
Originally posted by AGOriginally posted by robustpuppy [/i]
If you're lucky, you get as far as another Fbetty. She got him to say he was wistfully turning his wedding ring.
|
edited to fix quote codes. e/o
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 09:39 AM
|
#18371
|
prodigal poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
|
RIAA Subpoenas
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 10:16 AM
|
#18372
|
She Said, Let's Go!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hollerin' for Heras
Posts: 1,781
|
Synthetic Diamonds
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
It would be, but there isn't a ring on this earth she could hock that would buy her some man-candy (no matter how hot she thinks her avatar makes her).
Thurgreed(she should probably start loading up on synthetic cats now)Marshall
|
So right. I'd much rather have a short-term gf with a stinking ass like you had than the happiness (and impeccable hygiene) I have.
Why do you keep posting about me so intently, you freak?
__________________
but you'll look sweet/upon the seat/of a bicycle built for two
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 10:31 AM
|
#18373
|
(Moderator) oHIo
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
|
vince mcmahon tribute
BB4 SPOILER!!!!
HOH contest
[the space]
[more space]
it is my understanding that after 6 or so hours and three cages that Erika is the new HOH. I would assume that she would put up two of the three stooges, but I guess Jun is also a possibility.
aV
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 10:34 AM
|
#18374
|
Subject to Discipline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Singing Rnold's campaign theme song
Posts: 55
|
RIAA Subpoenas
In related news:
HR 2752, The Author, Consumer, and Computer Owner Protection and Security Act (ACCOPS) is sponsored by two Democratic representatives, John Conyers of Michigan and Howard Berman, California.
The bill would [make it a FELONY and] impose a prison sentence of up to five years for anyone who makes copyrighted material available over a computer network without permission [i.e. a SINGLE song].
Linkage
I haven't paid much attention to the debate, but it seems to me that there's something unseemly about criminalizing behavior (i.e. having a file on your computer where someone else may grab it) that could well be legal (fair use), rather than criminalizing activity which is pretty much indefensible (actual downloading).
That and if you're going to pass a law that tens of millions of people would be violating, at the level of a felony nonetheless, it sets up serious potential for abitrary and capricious enforcement.
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 10:39 AM
|
#18375
|
Guest
|
vince mcmahon tribute
Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
BB4 SPOILER!!!!
HOH contest
[the space]
[more space]
it is my understanding that after 6 or so hours and three cages that Erika is the new HOH. I would assume that she would put up two of the three stooges, but I guess Jun is also a possibility.
aV
|
spoiler
Being the big loser I am, I looked up a site with the recaps and saw she won and that she and Jack wree talking about finally puting Justin up. I assume that Robert (she still hates him, right?) goes up also but have my fingers crossed that the bulldog is in danger. but erika wont want the stooges voting so putting two up only leaves one to vote.
my question is that Justin (?) said that he was one of four votes when talking about dumping Nathan. Who is the fourth, Jun or Allison?
|
|
|
![Closed Thread](http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/images/buttons/threadclosed.gif) |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|