New Fashion Board 10-3-2003 - 11-7-2003 - Page 124

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
They found wmds?

Yes, and written evidence that Saddam and al Qaeda collaborated in their manufacture. They found a corpse with his finger on the button that would have launched the nuclear weapons at the White House. There was an American army bullet in his head. He was, of course, shot from the front because no red-blooded American would be dishonorable enough to shoot even an evil goon bent on destroying Freedom and Democracy and The American Way in the back.

robustpuppy · 10-15-2003, 02:09 PM

Because I'm bored (more underpants talk, please):

A [pregnant, 18 year old] woman who chased a 4-year-old boy through a McDonald's restaurant in Montgomery County, pinned him in a headlock and screamed obscenities as she smeared his face with hot french fries [because he accidentally got ice cream on her shirt sleeve while she was in line to order] was sentenced yesterday to four days in jail and ordered to attend anger management and parenting classes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Oct14.html

Edited to add, in her defense, it was her favorite shirt.

Atticus Grinch · 10-15-2003, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
First. SPoiler space please.

I'm at a loss to understand what I spoiled. I didn't give away the substance of any jokes, and there is absolutely nothing about this show that relies upon the element of surprise. Just a vague sense of foreboding, and an unflinching, unblinking camera. Oh, and a pitiable Larry Sanders character who's very marginally easier on the eyes than Garry Shandling.

Quote:

fourth- is NBC actually in the process of bringing this show to the US? I think they could do it if they changed it drastically and didnt try to just carbon copy the characters and the script.

Greg Daniels, co-creator of "King of the Hill" and veteran of "The Simpsons," is going to be doing the American version. BBC is in talks with NBC to fund the pilot. God help us all.

Evening Standard news article.

robustpuppy · 10-15-2003, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
You're assuming people here wear underpants.

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I don't, which is why I was hoping to live vicariously through the stories of those who do.

You don't wear underwear, and you want to live vicariously through those who do?

Counterintuitive, but interesting.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Because I'm bored (more underpants talk, please):

A [pregnant, 18 year old] woman who chased a 4-year-old boy through a McDonald's restaurant in Montgomery County, pinned him in a headlock and screamed obscenities as she smeared his face with hot french fries [because he accidentally got ice cream on her shirt sleeve while she was in line to order] was sentenced yesterday to four days in jail and ordered to attend anger management and parenting classes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Oct14.html

Washington Post? You dare quote an article from the Washington Post? This is evil left-wing propaganda! Shame on you!

And I wonder what was in HER underpants. Not just Kobe-stuff. I bet she isn't married. No welfare for her! Send her to the workhouse!

So, Thrasher, speaking of underwear and the lack thereof, if you meet your husband for lunch and indulge in lustful copulation in the bathroom of the restaurant, is there a drippy mess? That really is a situation in which underwear come (ha, ha) in handy. Or so I've been given to understand.

ThrashersFan · 10-15-2003, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Because I'm bored (more underpants talk, please):

A [pregnant, 18 year old] woman who chased a 4-year-old boy through a McDonald's restaurant in Montgomery County, pinned him in a headlock and screamed obscenities as she smeared his face with hot french fries [because he accidentally got ice cream on her shirt sleeve while she was in line to order] was sentenced yesterday to four days in jail and ordered to attend anger management and parenting classes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Oct14.html

Edited to add, in her defense, it was her favorite shirt.

I must have missed the part of the story telling us where the 4 year old's fucking parents were during all of this. Come on, some strange bitch in her best "baby shower shirt" starts screaming at your toddler in Mickey D's and you let it get to the point where she is chasing him and then tackling him and then smearing hot food in his face? I would have put a stop to that shit right where it started.

Bad_Rich_Chic · 10-15-2003, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
My [cursory] read of the FoxNews article did not find a reference to the non-kobe seeded underpants being ones that she wore on the fateful night. Just that another seeded pair existed. Maybe you need to be a bit more discerning in absorbing your news.

What is the defense doing with non-relevant underpants anyway? Did Kobe's lawyers conduct a panty raid or something?

BR(or are the other knickers somehow relevant but no one knows why?)C

ThrashersFan · 10-15-2003, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
So, Thrasher, speaking of underwear and the lack thereof, if you meet your husband for lunch and indulge in lustful copulation in the bathroom of the restaurant, is there a drippy mess? That really is a situation in which underwear come (ha, ha) in handy. Or so I've been given to understand.

I never meet anyone for lunch so this is not an issue for me.

robustpuppy · 10-15-2003, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
So, Thrasher, speaking of underwear and the lack thereof, if you meet your husband for lunch and indulge in lustful copulation in the bathroom of the restaurant, is there a drippy mess? That really is a situation in which underwear come (ha, ha) in handy. Or so I've been given to understand.

You're disgusting. Copulation in a public restroom? Three words: [omitted because it is lunchtime for some, but Atticus knows they start with f, c, and b].

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I must have missed the part of the story telling us where the 4 year old's fucking parents were during all of this.

I think you know if you are calling them "fucking" parents. In the bathroom working on another kid.

ltl/fb · 10-15-2003, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Three words: [omitted because it is lunchtime for some, but Atticus knows they start with f, c, and b].

I don't get it.

Edited to add, I try to make you happy with sex stuff and you call me disgusting. I can't win.

Penske_Account · 10-15-2003, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
Did Kobe's lawyers conduct a panty raid or something?

They are going to auction them on EBay to defray his legal bills.

10-15-2003, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Which proves that she might not have been a virgin. Shock and Awe!!!

Since this is the rape trial of Kobe Bryant and not the trial of Joan of Arc, I really don't see the point.

If anything, these strong arm tactics by the defense are making Kobe look worse.

What really galls me is that the lawyer bringing this irrelevant shit up is a woman. this puts her right up there with Robert Shapiro on the World's Most Despicalbe Lawyers list.

Penske_Account · 10-15-2003, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Washington Post? You dare quote an article from the Washington Post? This is evil left-wing propaganda! Shame on you!

This is typical left wing looniness. I have no problem admitting that there is bias in the media. On both sides. The left on the other hand only sees Fox and Rush as the biased parties.

robustpuppy · 10-15-2003, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I don't get it.

Edited to add, I try to make you happy with sex stuff and you call me disgusting. I can't win.

I'm sorry, I meant to write "That's disgusting." It wasn't about you, it was about the restroom. Forgive my careless tossing about of personal pronouns.

But your sex talk could use some work.